Roy, Souvik and Kumar, Ujjwal (2021): Local incentive compatibility in non-convex type-spaces.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110872.pdf Download (437kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We explore the equivalence of local incentive compatibility (LIC) (Carroll (2012)) and incentive compatibility (IC) in non-convex type-spaces. We provide a sufficient condition on a type-space called minimal richness for the said equivalence. Using this result, we show that LIC and IC are equivalent on large class of non-convex type-spaces such as type-spaces perturbed by modularity and concave-modularity. The gross substitutes type-space and the generalized gross substitutes and complements type-space are important examples of type-spaces perturbed by modularity and concave-modularity, respectively. Finally, we provide a geometric property consisting of three conditions for the equivalence of LIC and IC, and show that all the conditions are indispensable.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Local incentive compatibility in non-convex type-spaces |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | local incentive compatibility, (global) incentive compatibility, non-convex type-spaces, minimally rich type-spaces, gross substitutes type-space, generalized gross substitutes and complements type-space |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D47 - Market Design D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design |
Item ID: | 110872 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Souvik Roy |
Date Deposited: | 02 Dec 2021 05:59 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2021 05:59 |
References: | ARMSTRONG, M. (2000): “Optimal multi-object auctions,” The Review of Economic Studies, 67, 455–481. AUSUBEL, L. M. AND P. R. MILGROM (2002): “Ascending auctions with package bidding,” Advances in Theoretical Economics, 1. CARROLL, G. (2012): “When are local incentive constraints sufficient?” Econometrica, 80, 661–686. FUDENBERG, D. AND J. TIROLE (1991): “Game Theory,” MIT Press, Cambridge. FUJISHIGE, S. AND Z. YANG (2003): “A note on Kelso and Crawford’s gross substitutes condition,” Mathematics of Operations Research, 28, 463–469. GUL, F. AND E. STACCHETTI (1999): “Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes,” Journal of Economic theory, 87, 95–124. KELSO, A. S. AND V. P. CRAWFORD (1982): “Job matching, coalition formation, and gross substitutes,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1483–1504. KUSHNIR, A. I. AND L. V. LOKUTSIEVSKIY (2021): “When is a monotone function cyclically monotone?” Theoretical Economics, 16, 853–879. MISHRA, D., A. PRAMANIK, AND S. ROY (2016): “Local incentive compatibility with transfers,” Games and Economic Behavior, 100, 149–165. MUROTA, K. (2016): “Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory,” Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, 1, 151–273. PAES LEME, R. (2017): “Gross substitutability: An algorithmic survey,” Games and Economic Behavior, 106, 294–316. REIJNIERSE, H., A. VAN GELLEKOM, AND J. A. POTTERS (2002): “Verifying gross substitutability,” Economic Theory, 20, 767–776. SHIOURA, A. AND Z. YANG (2015): “Equilibrium, auction, and generalized gross substitutes and complements,” Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 58, 410–435. VOHRA, R. V. (2011): Mechanism design: a linear programming approach, vol. 47, Cambridge University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110872 |