Chen, Lipeng and Yu, Yang and Addis, Amsalu K. and Guo, Xiao (2022): Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Educational Efficiency between Major Countries across the World. Published in: Sustainability , Vol. 14, No. 7 (29 March 2022): pp. 1-17.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112562.pdf Download (863kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Education is a fundamental factor to enhance a country’s comprehensive national strength and international competitiveness. Recently, several governments have been attracting investments in educational sectors in contemplation of meliorating a country’s overall strength. This study empirically assesses and compares the educational efficiency of 29 major countries across the world using panel data for 2010–2016 by employing data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the super-slacks-based measure (super-SBM) model at the static level combined with the Malmquist index (MI) to investigate educational efficiency at the dynamic level. The results indicate, inter alia, huge average education efficiency differences existed among the studied countries, the highest being Japan (3.2845) and lowest Norway (0.4137), there are differences in the bias of technological progress among the studied countries during the sample period and technological progress directly affects the sustainability of educational efficiency, the growth rate of total factor productivity (TFP) index has been reduced in 2010–2013 but increased in 2014–2016 and techno-logical progress has been the dominant factor influencing the rise of the education TFP index. Based on the results, this study identifies the merits and drawbacks of education efficiency across the sample countries and presents relevant recommendations to promote investment in the education sector and human capital.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Educational Efficiency between Major Countries across the World |
English Title: | Empirical Assessment and Comparison of Educational Efficiency between Major Countries across the World |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Educational efficiency; Super-SBM model; Malmquist index; Total factor productivity (TFP) index; Data envelopment analysis (DEA) |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I25 - Education and Economic Development I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 112562 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Amsalu K. Addis |
Date Deposited: | 04 Apr 2022 08:54 |
Last Modified: | 04 Apr 2022 08:54 |
References: | 1.Asongu, S.A.; Diop, S.; Addis, A.K. Governance, Inequality and Inclusive Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. Forum Soc. Econ. 2020, Forthcoming, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2020.1856166. 2.Chytilova, H. The Causal Impact of Economic Education on Achievement of Optimum Outcomes. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 106, 2628-2635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.303. 3.Ozturk, I. The Role of Education in Economic Development: A Theoretical Perspective. SSRN Electron. J. 2008, XXXIII, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1137541. 4.Xu, H.; Liu, F. Measuring the Efficiency of Education and Technology via DEA Approach: Implications on National Devel-opment. Soc. Sci. 2017, 6, 136. 5.Sahnoun, M.; Abdennadher, C. Returns to investment in education in the OECD countries: Does governance quality matter? J. Knowl. Econ. 2021, Forthcoming, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00783-0. 6.Wolf, F.; Zohlnhöfer, R. Investing in human capital? The determinants of private education expenditure in 26 OECD countries. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 2009, 19, 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928709104738. 7.Griffore, R.J.; Phenice, L.A.; Hsieh, M.-C. Trend Analysis of Educational Investments and Outcomes. J. Res. Educ. 2014, 24, 154-161. 8.Miningou, E.W. Quality Education and the Efficiency of Public Expenditure: A Cross-Country Comparative Analysis; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019. 9.Ross, P.H. Occupation Aspirations, Education Investment, and Cognitive Outcomes: Evidence from Indian Adolescents. World Dev. 2019, 123, 104613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104613. 10.Coleman, J.S. Equality of Educational Opportunity; U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education: Washington, DC, USA, 1966. 11.De Witte, K.; López-Torres, L. Efficiency in education: A review of literature and a way forward. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2017, 68, 339-363. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.92. 12.Titus, M.A.; Eagan, K. Examining Production Efficiency in Higher Education: The Utility of Stochastic Frontier Analysis. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research; Paulsen, M.B., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Germany, 2016; pp. 441-512. 13.Rz?dzi?ski, L.; Sworowska, A. Parametric and Non Parametric Methods for Efficiency Assessment of State Higher Vocational Schools in 2009-2011. Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2016, 4, 95-112. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2016.040107. 14.Izadi, H.; Johnes, G.; Oskrochi, R.; Crouchley, R. Stochastic Frontier Estimation of a CES Cost Function: The Case of Higher Education in Britain. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2002, 21, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00044-3. 15.Johnes, J. Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Application to the Measurement of Efficiency in Higher Education. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2006, 25, 273-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005. 16.Sibiano, P.; Agasisti, T. Efficiency of Public Spending in Education: A Challenge among Italian Regions. In Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación Volume 6; Caparrós Ruiz, A., Ed.; Asociación de Economía de la Educación: Zaragoza, Spain : 2011; pp. 503-516, Volume 6. 17.Sibiano, P.; Agasisti, T. Efficiency and Heterogeneity of Public Spending in Education among Italian Regions. J. Public Aff. 2013, 13, 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1404. 18.Dinc?, M.S.; Dinc?, G.; Andronic, M.L.; Pasztori, A.M. Assessment of the European Union's Educational Efficiency. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063116. 19.Johnes, J.; Yu, L. Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis. China Econ. Rev. 2008, 19, 679-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.08.004. 20.Guccio, C.; Martorana, M.F.; Monaco, L. Evaluating the Impact of the Bologna Process on the Efficiency Convergence of Italian Universities: A Non-Parametric Frontier Approach. J. Prod. Anal. 2016, 45, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-015-0459-6. 21.Ba?kaya, S.; Klumpp, M. International Data Envelopment Analysis in Higher Education: How Do Institutional Factors Influ-ence University Efficiency? J. Bus. Econ. 2014, 5, 2085-2090. https://doi.org/10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/11.05.2014/013. 22.Yalçin, S.; Tav?ancil, E. The Comparison of Turkish Students' PISA Achievement Levels by Year via Data Envelopment Analysis. Educ. Sci. Theory Pr. 2014, 14, 961-968. 23.Al-Bagoury, S. Dea to Evaluate Efficiency of African Higher Education. Educ. Res. Essays 2013, 3, 742-747. 24.McMahon, W. The external social benefits of higher education: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. J. Educ. Financ. 2021, 46, 398. 25.Ji, Y.-B.; Lee, C. Data Envelopment Analysis. Stata J. 2010, 10, 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1001000207. 26.Martín-Gamboa, M.; Iribarren, D. Coupled Life Cycle Thinking and Data Envelopment Analysis for Quantitative Sustainability Improvement. In Methods in Sustainability Science; Ren, J., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 295-320. 27.Cova-Alonso, D.J.; Díaz-Hernández, J.J.; Martínez-Budría, E. A strong efficiency measure for CCR/BCC models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020, 291, 284-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.006. 28.Tone, K. A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 130, 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00407-5. 29.Tone, K. A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 143, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00324-1. 30.Coelli, T.; Rao, D.S.P.; Battese, G.E. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1997. 31.Malmquist, S. Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces. Trab. Estad. 1953, 4, 209-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03006863. 32.Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Margaritis, D. Malmquist Productivity Indexes and DEA. In Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science; Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2011; Volume 164, pp. 127-149. 33.OECD. 21st-Century Readers: Developing Literacy Skills in a Digital World; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2021. 34.Chen, K.; Zhu, K.; Xu, J.; Meng, M. Sustainable development education from the perspective of China. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Information and Education Innovations-ICIEI 2019, Durham, UK, 10-12 July 2019; pp. 105-108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345094.3345108. 35.Olivier, J.; Kruger, D. Science Education in South Africa. In Science Education in Countries Along the Belt & Road: Future Insights and New Requirements; Huang, R., Xin, B., Tlili, A., Yang, F., Zhang, X., Zhu, L., Jemni, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6955-2_12. 36.Xue, W.; Li, H.; Ali, R.; Rehman, R.; Fernández-Sánchez, G. Assessing the static and dynamic efficiency of scientific research of HEIs China: Three stage dea-malmquist index approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158207. 37.Bacovic, M.; Andrijasevic, Z.; Pejovic, B. STEM Education and Growth in Europe. J. Knowl. Econ. 2021, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00817-7. 38.Abayasekara, A.; Arunatilake, N. School-Level Resource Allocation and Education Outcomes in Sri Lanka. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2018, 61, 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.12.010. 39.BenDavid-Hadar, I. Funding Education: Developing a Method of Allocation for Improvement. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2018, 32, 2-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-07-2016-0161. 40.Cheng, S.; Zhou, Y. The Evaluation and Optimization to the Higher Educational Resource Allocation. Int. J. Cogn. Inform. Nat. Intell. 2015, 9, 60-73. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcini.2015010105. 41.Liang, L.; Wang, Z.B.; Luo, D.; Wei, Y.; Sun, J. Synergy effects and it's influencing factors of China's high technological inno-vation and regional economy. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231335. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231335. 42.Song, M.; Peng, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhao, X. Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2021, 174, 121276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121276. 43.Aristovnik, A. The Impact of ICT on Educational Performance and Its Efficiency in Selected EU and OECD Countries: A Non-Parametric Analysis. SSRN Electron. J. 2012, 11, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2187482. 44.Ghavifekr, S.; Rosdy, W.A.W. Teaching and Learning with Technology: Effectiveness of ICT Integration in Schools. Int. J. Res. Educ. Sci. 2015, 1, 175. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596. 45.Johnes, J.; Portela, M.; Thanassoulis, E. Efficiency in education. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2017, 68, 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-016-0109-z. 46.Maradana, R.P.; Pradhan, R.P.; Dash, S.; Gaurav, K.; Jayakumar, M.; Chatterjee, D. Does innovation promote economic growth? Evidence from European countries. J. Innov. Entrep. 2017, 6, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-016-0061-9. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112562 |