Violencia contra la mujer en ecuador, como consecuencia de la pobreza, desempleo, nivel de educación y demás factores socioeconómicos.

Arévalo Morocho, Edison Joel and Lozano Veintimilla, Elizabeth Alexandra (2022): Violencia contra la mujer en ecuador, como consecuencia de la pobreza, desempleo, nivel de educación y demás factores socioeconómicos.

Abstract

Gender-based violence has been occurring globally, to the point that (WHO, 2013) has described it as a health problem of epidemic proportions, of which one in three women suffered violence from their partner, relative or someone close, this due to the interrelation of cultural, economic, legal and political factors. In the last three decades, there have been important efforts towards the eradication of gender violence in Ecuador, but it has not been enough since 6 out of 10 women have experienced violence, this being 64.9% in 2019. This research has as a general objective to investigate the effects of the occurrence of violence against women, and to know if the level of poverty, unemployment, lack of education and other socioeconomic factors are the causes of this conflict in Ecuador in 2019. For which, it is uses the discrete choice model (logit method), allowing to obtain as a result that poverty has a positive relationship with cases of psychological and sexual violence, and a negative relationship for physical violence, but statistically significant for each of these three types of violence, in addition to the level of education, ethnicity and violence in childhood were also statistically significant to the model. As policy implications we have that the State should place more emphasis on education since it has an essential role in reducing violence against women within the couple. In this sense, the country must bet on the promotion of an education focused on gender equity that provides the same opportunities to both men and women.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Violence against women in Ecuador, as a result of poverty, unemployment, level of education and other socioeconomic factors.
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Gender violence; Poverty; Educational level; Discrete choice models.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C25 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions ; Probabilities; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J12 - Marriage ; Marital Dissolution ; Family Structure ; Domestic Abuse; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity

References

Alméras, D., Bravo, R., Milosavljevic, V., Montaño, S., y Rico, M. (2002). Violencia contra la mujer en relación de pareja: América Latina y el Caribe: una propuesta para medir su magnitud y evolución (Vol. 40). United Nations Publications.

Altamirano, A. S. C. (2021). Incidencia de la violencia contra la mujer y miembros del núcleo familiar en tiempos de pandemia. Revista Jurídica Crítica y Derecho, 2(3), 11-29.

Andía Vera, C. L. F. (2021). Estudio sobre la relación entre participación laboral femenina y la probabilidad de ser víctima de violencia doméstica en el Perú 2009-2019.

Ari, Erkan y Aydin, Noyan (2016). «Examination by Multinomial Logistic Regression Model of the factors affecting the types of domestic violence against women: A case of Tur¬key» en International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 5(11), pp. 67--74.

Arisukwu, O., Igbolekwu, C., Adebisi, T., & Akindele, F. (2021). Perception of domestic violence among rural women in Kuje. Heliyon, 7(2), e06303.

Belmonte N. (1995). Variaciones sobre la violencia. Psicología. Iberoamericana.; 3(3), 9-10.

Bueno, C. y Henderson, E. (2017). Bargaining or Backlash ? Evidence on Intimate Partner Violence from the Dominican Republic. Feminist Economics, 0(0), 1–27.

Callirgos, J.C. (1996) Sobre Heroes y Batallas. Los Caminos de la identidad masculina. 1era. Edición. Lima: Escuela para el Desarrollo.

Cataño Sánchez, J. L. (2018). Aceptación de la violencia doméstica, pobreza y desigualdad: evidencia para Colombia (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad EAFIT).

CEPAL STAT. (2018). Base de datos y publicaciones estadísticas.

Chavez Eusebio, J. G. (2021). Causas por las que se manifiesta la violencia contra la mujer en zonas de extrema pobreza del Perú-2019.

Chávez Intriago, M. Y., & Méndez, A. J. J. (2016). Violencia de género en Ecuador. Revista Publicando, 3(8), 104-115.

Corsi, J. y Dohmen, M. (1995). Violencia masculina en la pareja: una aproximación al diagnóstico y a los modelos de intervención. Barcelona: Ed. Paidós.

Dobash, R. E. y Dobash, R.P. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy, Free Press; New York; Open Books, Shepton Mallet.

Fiscalía General de Ecuador (2020). Análisis de la Violencia de género en Ecuador. Recuperado de: https://www.epn.edu.ec/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ana%CC%81lisis-de-la-violencia-de-genero-en-ecuador-2020.-20-11-2020ai.pdf

Gillum, T. L. (2019). The intersection of intimate partner violence and poverty in Black communities. Aggression and violent behavior, 46, 37-44.

González, L., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2020). Gender norms and intimate partner violence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 178, 223-248

Goode, W. (1971). Force and violence in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 624-636.

Gujarati, D., y Porter, D. (2010). Econometría (quinta edición).México: Editorial McGraw-Hill. Instituto Nacional De Censos Y Estadísticas Del Ecuador (INEC), 2020. Encuesta Nacional sobre Relaciones Familiares y Violencia de Género contra las Mujeres.

Kalmus, D. S. y Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife's marital dependency and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 277-286. Lenze, Jana y Klasen, Stephan (2017). «Does women’s labor force participation reduce domestic violence? evidence from Jordan» en Feminist Economics, pp. 1-29.

Li, C. C., Matthews, A. K., Yen, P. S., Chen, Y. F., & Dong, X. (2021). Intimate partner violence and its relationship with psychological distress among older Asian Americans: results from the California Health Interview Survey. Asian journal of psychiatry, 63, 102798. Llano, L., & Mosquera, V. (2006). El modelo logit una alternativa para medir probabilidad de permanencia estudiantil. irtualm-vBibliotec

Macmillan, R. y Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: La-bor-force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 947-958. McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2016). Understanding youth violence: The mediating effects of gender, poverty and vulnerability. Journal of criminal justice, 45, 71-77.

McCloskey L. A. (1996). Socioeconomic and coercive power within the fam-ily. Gender and Society, 10, 449–463. Mcfadden, D. L. (1976). Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey. In Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 363-390.

Moran J. (2019). Análisis de la violencia en las mujeres con modelo de escenario de riesgo en el Salvador. Revista ALERTA Año 2019, Vol. 2 Nº 1.

Mshweshwe, L. (2020). Understanding domestic violence: masculinity, culture, traditions. Heliyon, 6(10), e05334.

Murillo Damián, M. H. (2019). Incidencia del desempleo y la educación en la violencia contra la mujer en el Perú, período 2009-2017.

Organización de Naciones Unidas-Mujeres (2020). Violencia contra las mujeres: la pandemia en la sombra. https://www.unwomen.org/es/news/stories/2020/4/statement-ed-phumzile-violence-against-women-during-pandemic.

Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU) (1994). Declaración sobre la eliminación de la violencia contra las mujeres (Res. A.G.48/104).

Organización de Naciones Unidas-Mujeres (2020). Violencia contra las mujeres: la pandemia en la sombra. https://www.unwomen.org/es/news/stories/2020/4/statement-ed-phumzile-violence-against-women-during-pandemic.

Oxfam Internacional. (2018). Rompiendo moldes: transformar imaginarios y normas sociales para eliminar la violencia contra las mujeres.

Pagelow, M.D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Preager Publishers. Paidos.

Portillo, Henry Amiel Condori (2016). «Determinantes de los tipos de violencia do-méstica en el Perú – 2015» en Revista de investigación k’uskiykuy, pp. 27-46.

Quispe Pacori, C. (2021). Determinantes socioeconómicos de la violencia contra la mujer en los hogares del distrito de Azángaro: 2020.

Strube, M.J. (1988). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: empirical evidence and theorical issues. Psychological Bulletin,. 104, n. º 2. 236-250.

Tama, L., & Anabel, D. (2021). Relación entre la pobreza y la violencia doméstica en contra de la mujer en Ecuador, en el período julio 2018 agosto 2019.

Urdiales, L. y cols. (2017). Factores de riesgo que influyen en la violencia intrafamiliar en la Parroquia Jadán del Cantón Gualaceo. Azuay. Universidad de Cuenca. Ecuador.

Unterhalter, E., y North, A. (2010). Assessing gender mainstreaming in the education sector: depoliticised technique or a step towards women’s rights and gender equality?. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40, 389-404.

Uriza, K. T., & Pérez, M. L. S. (2021). La violencia sexual contra la mujer en zonas de conflicto armado en Colombia: un enfoque a partir de un modelo logit. Asparkía. Investigació feminista, (38), 125-148.

Villate, L. (2020). El confinamiento incrementó la violencia intrafamiliar, ¿por qué? Reporte de Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.

World Health Organization. (2013). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. World Health Organization.

Yllö, K. (1988). Political and methodological debates in wife abuse research. En K. Yllö y M. Bograd (Eds.), Femenist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.