Ginzburg, Boris (2019): Slacktivism. Forthcoming in: Journal of Theoretical Politics
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116227.pdf Download (380kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Many countries have introduced e-government petitioning systems, in which a petition that gathers a certain quota of signatures triggers some political outcome. This paper models citizens who choose whether to sign such a petition. Citizens are imperfectly informed about the petition's chance of bringing change. The number of citizens is large, while the cost of signing is positive but low. I show that a petition that can bring change succeeds by a strictly positive margin. Hence, a citizen signing the petition is almost surely not pivotal. On the other hand, a petition that cannot bring change still gathers the required number of signatures when citizens are not very well informed, implying a failure of information aggregation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Slacktivism |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | online petitions, collective action, voting, political participation, threshold public goods |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods |
Item ID: | 116227 |
Depositing User: | Boris Ginzburg |
Date Deposited: | 06 Feb 2023 14:24 |
Last Modified: | 06 Feb 2023 14:24 |
References: | Aguiar-Conraria, Lúıs and Magalhães, Pedro C, "Referendum design, quorum rules and turnout", Public Choice 144, 1-2 (2010), pp. 63--81. Aguiar-Conraria, Lúıs, Magalhães, Pedro C, and Vanberg, Christoph A, "What are the best quorum rules? A laboratory investigation", Public Choice 185, 1 (2020), pp. 215--231. Ambrus, Attila, Greiner, Ben, and Sastro, Anne, "The case for nil votes: Voter behavior under asymmetric information in compulsory and voluntary voting systems", Journal of Public Economics 154 (2017), pp. 34--48. BBC News, "Brexit debate: Do petitions ever work?" (2019). Banerjee, Abhijit and Somanathan, Rohini, "A simple model of voice", The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1 (2001), pp. 189--227. Barbieri, Stefano and Malueg, David A, "Threshold uncertainty in the private-information subscription game", Journal of Public Economics 94, 11-12 (2010), pp. 848--861. Battaglini, Marco, "Public protests and policy making", The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132, 1 (2017), pp. 485--549. Battaglini, Marco and Benabou, Roland, "Trust, coordination, and the industrial organization of political activism", Journal of the European Economic Association 1, 4 (2003), pp. 851--889. Battaglini, Marco, Morton, Rebecca B, and Patacchini, Eleonora, "Social Groups and the Effectiveness of Protests", (2021). Bolle, Friedel and Spiller, Jörg, "Cooperation against all predictions", Economic Inquiry 59, 3 (2021), pp. 904--924. Borgers, Tilman, "Costly voting", American Economic Review 94, 1 (2004), pp. 57--66. Cartwright, Edward, Stepanova, Anna, and Xue, Lian, "Impulse balance and framing effects in threshold public good games", Journal of public economic theory 21, 5 (2019), pp. 903--922. Denter, Philipp and Ginzburg, Boris, "Troll Farms and Voter Disinformation", Available at SSRN 3919032 (2022). Denter, Philipp, Dumav, Martin, and Ginzburg, Boris, "Social connectivity, media bias, and correlation neglect", The Economic Journal 131, 637 (2021), pp. 2033--2057. Deutsche Welle, "Citizen petitions -- the German people's 'hotline' to government" (2017). Downs, Anthony, An Economic Theory of Democracy (Harper, 1957). Dziuda, Wioletta, Gitmez, A Arda, and Shadmehr, Mehdi, "The Difficulty of Easy Projects", American Economic Review: Insights (2020). Ekmekci, Mehmet and Lauermann, Stephan, "Informal Elections with Dispersed Information", (2019). Enikolopov, Ruben, Makarin, Alexey, and Petrova, Maria, "Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia", Econometrica 88, 4 (2020), pp. 1479--1514. Feddersen, Timothy and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang, "Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information", Econometrica 65, 5 (1997), pp. 1029--1058. Ginzburg, Boris and Guerra, José-Alberto, "Guns, pets, and strikes: an experiment on identity and political action", (2022). Ginzburg, Boris, Guerra, José-Alberto, and Lekfuangfu, Warn N, "Critical Mass in Collective Action", (2023). Grover, Caitlin, E-petitions (Parliament Library & Information Service, Parliament of Victoria, 2016). Herrera, Helios and Mattozzi, Andrea, "Quorum and turnout in referenda", Journal of the European Economic Association 8, 4 (2010), pp. 838--871. Krasteva, Silvana and Yildirim, Huseyin, "(Un) Informed charitable giving", Journal of Public Economics 106 (2013), pp. 14--26. Krishna, Vijay and Morgan, John, "Voluntary voting: Costs and benefits", Journal of Economic Theory 147, 6 (2012), pp. 2083--2123. Levine, David K and Palfrey, Thomas R, "The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study", American Political Science Review 101, 1 (2007), pp. 143--158. Lim, Wooyoung and Zhang, Pengfei, "Herd immunity and a vaccination game: An experimental study", PloS one 15, 5 (2020), pp. e0232652. Lindner, Ralf and Riehm, Ulrich, "Electronic petitions and institutional modernization. International parliamentary e-petition systems in comparative perspective", JeDEM-eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 1, 1 (2009), pp. 1--11. Lohmann, Susanne, "A signaling model of informative and manipulative political action", American Political Science Review 87, 2 (1993), pp. 319--333. Maniquet, François and Morelli, Massimo, "Approval quorums dominate participation quorums", Social Choice and Welfare 45, 1 (2015), pp. 1--27. Margetts, Helen, John, Peter, Escher, Tobias, and Reissfelder, Stéphane, "Social information and political participation on the internet: an experiment", European Political Science Review 3, 3 (2011), pp. 321--344. McBride, Michael, "Discrete public goods under threshold uncertainty", Journal of Public Economics 90, 6-7 (2006), pp. 1181--1199. Mickoleit, Arthur, "Social media use by governments: A policy primer to discuss trends, identify policy opportunities and guide decision makers", OECD Working Papers on Public Governance (2014), pp. 0_1. Myatt, David P, "A theory of voter turnout", (2015). Nöldeke, Georg and Peña, Jorge, "Group size and collective action in a binary contribution game", Journal of Mathematical Economics (2020). Palfrey, Thomas R and Rosenthal, Howard, "Participation and the provision of discrete public goods: a strategic analysis", Journal of Public Economics 24, 2 (1984), pp. 171--193. Pogorelskiy, Kirill and Shum, Matthew, "News we like to share: How news sharing on social networks influences voting outcomes", Available at SSRN 2972231 (2019). Robbins, Herbert, "A remark on Stirling's formula", The American mathematical monthly 62, 1 (1955), pp. 26--29. Salas, Christian, "Persuading policy-makers", Journal of Theoretical Politics 31, 4 (2019), pp. 507--542. Scottish Parliament, "Petitions" (2021). UK Parliament, "Petitions" (2021). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116227 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Slacktivism. (deposited 03 Jul 2019 08:13)
- Slacktivism. (deposited 06 Feb 2023 14:24) [Currently Displayed]