Value Judgements, Positivism and Utility Comparisons in Economics

Drakopoulos, Stavros A. (2022): Value Judgements, Positivism and Utility Comparisons in Economics. Published in: Journal of Business Ethics (March 2023)

Abstract

The issue of interpersonal comparisons of utility is about the possibility (or not) of comparing the utility or welfare or the mental states in general, of different individuals. Embedded in the conceptual framework of utilitarianism, interpersonal comparisons were admissible in economics as part of the theoretical justification of welfare policies until the first decades of the twentieth century. Under the strong influence of the scientific philosophy of positivism as reflected in the works of early neoclassical economists and as epitomized by Lionel Robbins, utility comparisons were subsequently rejected as a value judgement. Robbins’ methodological stance is still prevalent among mainstream economists. Despite the explicit rejection of comparability by the majority of economists, interpersonal comparisons are necessary for many key policy issues, such as progressive taxation, social welfare policies, GDP based welfare comparisons, cost-benefit analysis, and public goods provision. In this paper, the case of interpersonal utility comparisons is discussed as an illustrative example of the usefulness of the study of the role of value judgements, and generally of the interrelationship between ethics and economics. It is also argued that the current tension between theory and policy practice might be resolved through the efforts of prominent economists and philosophers to challenge positivism, and especially its problematic treatment of value judgements and of ethical assumptions in general.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Value Judgements; Utility Comparisons; Positivism and Economics; Ethics and Economic Policy
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General > B00 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General

References

Acquier, A., Gond, JP., and Pasquero, J. 2011. “Rediscovering Howard R. Bowen’s Legacy: The Unachieved Agenda and Continuing Relevance of Social Responsibilities of the Businessman”, Business & Society, 50(4): 607 –646.

Adler, M. and Posner, E. 1999. “Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis”, The Yale Law Journal, 109 (2): 165-247.

Anomaly, J. 2015. “Public goods and government action”, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 14(2): 109–128.

Arrow, J.K. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values, New York: Wiley.

Asheim, G. 2011. “Comparing the Welfare of Growing Economies”, Revue d'economie politique, 121(1): 59-72.

Ayer, A. 1946. Language, Truth and Logic, Middlesex: Penguin Books.

Beckerman, W. 2017. Economics as Applied Ethics: Fact and Value in Economic Policy, Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Bentham, J. 1882. Theory of Legislation, London: Trubner and Co.

Bentham, J. 1969. in Mack, M.P. (Ed.), A Bentham Reader, New York: Pegasus.

Berend, I. 2016. An Economic History of the Twentieth-Century Europe: Economic Regimes from Laissez-Faire to Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bergson, A. 1938. "A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 310-34.

Beveridge, W. 1942. Social Insurance and Allied Services, London: His Majesty’s Stationary Office.

Bianchi, M. and Sanfilippo, E. (2015) ‘Social interdependencies in consumption: an early economic debate on social distinction, emulation and fashion’, History of Political Economy, 47(4): 547-575.

Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D. 1990. “A Review Article: The Case against the Use of the Sum of Compensating Variations in Cost-Benefit Analysis”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 23: 471-494

Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blaug, M. 1998. “The Positive-Normative Distinction”, in J. Davis, W. Hands, and U. Mäki (eds.), Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 370-374.

Blum, W. and Kalven, H. 1953. The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Boulding, K. 1970. Economics as a Science, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bowen, H. R. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper.

Brehier, E. 1971. The History of Philosopby vol VI, transl. by W. Baskin, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Bruni, L. and Sugden, R. 2007. “The Road not Taken: How Psychology was Removed from Economics, and how it might be brought back”, The Economic Journal, 117: 146-173.

Boland, L. 1982. The Foundations of Economic Method, London: Geo. Allen & Unwin.

Boland, L. 2003. The Foundations of Economic Method: A Popperian Perspective, London: Routledge.

Buccola, S. 1988. “Social Welfare and Interpersonal Utility Comparisons in Applied Policy Research”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(2): 454-458.

Caldwell, B. 2013. “Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought”, Southern Economic Journal, 79: 753-767.

Card, D. and Krueger, A. 1995. Myth and Measurement: The New Economics of the Minimum Wage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Carnap, R. 1981. “Protocol Statements and the Formal Mode of Speech” in O. Hanfling (ed.) Logical Positivism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Cairnes, J. 1875. The Character and Logical Method of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.

Colander, D. 1994. “The Art of Economics by the Numbers”, in R. Backhouse (ed.) New Directions in Economic Methodology, London: Routledge.

Coddington, A. 1972. “Positive Economics”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 5:1-15.

Crawford, I. and De Rock, B. 2014. “Empirical Revealed Preference”, Annual Review of Economics, 6: 503–24.

Creedy, J. 1981. "F.Y. Edgeworth", in O'Brien, D.P. and Presley, J. (Eds.), Pioneers of Modern Economics in Britain, London: Macmillan.

Courvisanos, J. Doughney,J. and Millmow, A.(eds) 2016. Reclaiming Pluralism in Economics, London: Routledge.

Davis, J. 1992. “Interpretation of Interpersonal Utility Comparisons: Positive, Normative or Descriptive”, Journal of Income Distribution, 1: 73-90.

Davis, J. 2022. “Economics as a Normative Discipline: Value Disentanglement in an ‘Objective’ Economics" , Marquette University Economics Working Papers, 2022-01, pp.1-24.

Dow, S. 2002. Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drakopoulos, S. 1991. Values and Economic Theory, Aldershot: Gower-Avebury.

Drakopoulos, S. 1997. “Origins and Development of the Trend towards Value-free Economics”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 19: 286–300.

Drakopoulos, S. 2011. “Wicksteed, Robbins and the Emergence of Mainstream Economic Methodology”, Review of Political Economy, 23: 461-70.

Drakopoulos, S. and Karayiannis, A. 2005. “A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian ‘Explanations’ in Economics”, History of Economic Ideas, 13: 51-73.

Edgeworth, F.Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics, London: Kegan Paul.

Edgeworth, F.Y.1925. Papers Relating to Political Economy, London: Macmillan,

Elhauge, E. (2005). “Sacrificing corporate profits in the public interest”. New York University Law Review, 80: 733-869.

Fisher, I. 1892 [1965]. Mathematical Investigations in the Theory of Value and Price, New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

Fleurbaey, M. and Tadenuma, K. 2014. "Universal Social Orderings: An Integrated Theory of Policy Evaluation, Inter-Society Comparisons, and Interpersonal Comparisons," Review of Economic Studies, v81(3): 1071-1101.

Fleurbaey, M. and Maniquet, F. 2018. “Optimal Income Taxation Theory and Principles of Fairness”, Journal of Economic Literature, 56(3): 1029–1079.

Frey, B. and Stutzer, A. 2002. Happiness and Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Friedman, M. 1953. ‘The methodology of positive economics’, in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.3-43.

Friedman, M.: 1970, 'The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits', New York Times Magazine, September 13th, pp. 32, 33, 122, 126.

Goodin, R. 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin, C. 2016. “Economics and Psychology: Why the Great Divide?”, History of Political Economy, 48 (suppl. 1): 71-169.

Gordon, S. 1977. “Social Science and Value Judgements”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 10: 529-46.

Gray, A. 1931. The Development of Economic Doctrine, London: Longman.

Griffith, T. 2004. “Progressive Taxation and Happiness”, Boston College Law Review, 45: 1363-1398.

Gustafson, A. 2013. “In Defense of a Utilitarian Business Ethic”, Business and Society Review, 118(3): 325–360.

Hammond, P. 1996. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: Why and how they are and should be made” in A.P. Hamlin (ed.), Ethics and Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 410–464.

Hands, D. W. 2010. “Economics, Psychology, and the History of Consumer Choice Theory,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4): 633-648.

Hands, D. W. 2016. “The Individual and the Market: Paul Samuelson on (Homothetic) Santa Claus Economics”, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23: 425–52

Hanson, N. 1971. Observation and Explanation: A Guide to Philosophy of Science. Harper & Row.

Harrod, R.E. 1938. "Scope and Method of Economics", The Economic Journal, 48: 383-412.

Harsanyi, J. 1955. "Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility", Journal of Political Economy, 63: 309-21.

Hausman, D. and McPherson, M. 1993. “Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXI: 671-731.

Hausman, D., McPherson, M. and Satz, D. 2017. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hicks, J.R., 1939. “The Foundations of Welfare Economics”, Economic Journal, 49: 696–712.

Hicks, J. 1946. Value and Capital, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hicks J. and Allen, R.G.D. 1934. “A Reconsideration of the Theory of Value”, Economica, 1: 52-76.

Hodgson, B. 1983. “Economic Science and Ethical Neutrality: The Problem of Teleology”, Journal of Business Ethics, 2: 237-253.

Hodgson, B. 1988. “Economic Science and Ethical Neutrality: The Intransigence of Evaluative Concepts “, Journal of Business Ethics, 7: 321-335.

Hodgson, B. 2001. Economics as moral science. New York: Springer.

Holdsworth, D. 2012. “Economics and the Limits of Optimization: Steps Towards Extending Bernard Hodgson’s Moral Science”, Journal of Business Ethics, 108: 37-48.

Hollis, M. and Nell, E. 1975. Rational Economic Man: A Philosophical Critique of Neo-Classical Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hume, D. 1739[1960]. A Treatise on Human Nature. ed. L. A. Selby-Bridge, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hutchison, T.W. 1964. Positive Economics and Policy Objectives, London: Allen and Unwin.

Jevons, W. S. 1871. The Theory of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.

Kakwani, N. 1981. “Welfare measures: An International Comparison”, Journal of Development Economics, 8: 21-45.

Kaldor, N. 1939. "Welfare Propositions of Economics", The Economic Journal, Vol. 49, pp. 549-52.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (Eds.). 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Keynes, J.N. 1904. The Scope and Method of Political Economy, New York: Macmillan.

Kristoffersen, I. 2017. “The Metrics of Subjective Wellbeing Data: An Empirical Evaluation of the Ordinal and Cardinal Comparability of Life Satisfaction Scores”, Social Indicators Research, 130(2): 845–865.

Kuehn, D. 2022. “’The Hardest of All the Problems’: Hochman, Rodgers, and Buchanan on Pareto Optimal Redistribution”, Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 15: 56-82.

Lawson, T.1997. Economics and Reality, London: Routledge.

Lawson, T. 2003. Reorienting Economics, London: Routledge.

Levinson, A. 2012. “Valuing Public Goods using Happiness Data: The Case of Air Quality”, Journal of Public Economics, 96: 869-880.

Little, I.M.D. 1973. A Critique of Welfare Economics, London: Oxford University Press.

Lipscomb, B. 2022. The Women are up to Something, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mäki, U. 2003. ‘‘The Methodology of Positive economics’ (1953) does not give us the Methodology of Positive Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 10: 495-505.

Mäki, U. 2009. (ed.) The Methodology of Positive Economics: Reflections on the Milton Friedman Legacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mankiw, G. 2009. Principles of Microeconomics (5th edition), Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning

Mandler, M. 2000. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility and the Policy Paralysis problem”, Social Choice and Welfare, 17: 95-115

Marshall, A. 1961., Principles of Economics, 9th edition, London: Macmillan.

Mill, J. S. 1874. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, London: Longman.

Mill, J.S. 1979. in Warnock, M. (Ed.), Utilitarianism, Glasgow: Collins.

Miller, R. 2011. Economics Today, 16th edition. US: Pearson Education.

Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mirowski, P. 1991. “The When, How and the Why of the Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 145-57.

Mishan, E. J. 1960. “A Survey of Welfare Economics, 1939-1959”, The Economic Journal, 70: 197-265.

Mongin, P. 2006. ‘Value judgments and Value Neutrality in Economics’, Economica, 73: 257-286

Morgan, M. 2012. The World in the Model: How Economists Work and Think, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Morrison, E. 1998. “Judicial Review of Discount Rates Used in Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis”, University of Chicago Law Review, 65: 1333-34.

Myrdal, G. 1958[1998]. Value in Social Theory, ed. and introduction by Paul Streeten, London: Routledge.

Ng, Y-K. 1979. Welfare Economics, London: Macmillan.

Ng, Y-K. 2022. Happiness—Concept, Measurement and Promotion, Singapore: Springer.

Nelson, J. A. 2018. Economics for Humans. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

O' Mahony, T. 2021. “Cost-Benefit Analysis and the environment: The time horizon is of the essence”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89(106587): 1-9.

Pareto, V. (1896-97) [1971], Corso di Economia Politica [Cours d’Économie Politique], Torino: Unione Tipographico-Editrice Torinese.

Pareto, V. 1906 [1971]. Manual of Political Economy, transl. by A. Schwier, London: Macmillan.

Pigou, A.C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan

Putnam, H. 2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Putnam, H. and Walsh, V. 2014. (eds) The End of Value-Free Economics, London and New York: Routledge.

Racko, G. 2019. “The Values of Economics”, Journal of Business Ethics, 154: 35-48.

Raffaelli,T. Becattini, G. and Dardi, M. 2006. (eds). The Elgar Companion to Alfred Marshall, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Redman, D. 1993. Economics and the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Riley, J. (2018). “Utilitarianism and Economic Theory”, in: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.

Robbins, L. 1938. “Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility: A Comment”, The Economic Journal, 48: 635-41.

Robertson, D.H. 1954. Utility and All That, London: Allen & Unwin.

Sadka, E. 1976. “On Progressive Income Taxation”, The American Economic Review, 66: 931-935.

Samuelson, P. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer’s Behavior”, Economica, 5: 61-71.

Samuelson, P. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,Mass.

Samuelson, P. and Nordhaus, W. 2010. Economics, 19th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Schabas, M. 1990. A World Ruled by Number: William Stanley Jevons and the Rise of Mathematical Economics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Scitovsky, T. 1951. "The State of Welfare Economics", American Economic Review, 41: 303-15.

Screpanti, E. and Zamagni, S. 2005. An Outline of the History of Economic Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Seligman, B. 1969. “The Impact of Positivism on Economic Thought”, History of Political Economy, 1: 256-78.

Sen, A. K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare, San Francisco: Holden-Day, Oliver and Boyd.

Sen, A. K. 1979. “The Welfare Basis of Real Income Comparisons: A survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, 17: 1-45.

Sen, A. K. 1982. Choice, Welfare and Measurement, Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

Sen, A. K. 1987. On Ethics and Economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.

Sen, A. K. 1997. “From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality”, Southern Economic Journal, 64(2): 384-401.

Sen, A.K. 2002. Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sidgwick, H. 1883. The Principles of Political Economy, London: Macmillan.

Sigmund, K. 2017. Exact Thinking in Demented Times: The Vienna Circle and the Epic Quest for the Foundations of Science, New York: Basic Books.

Sigot, N., 2002. “Jevons’s Debt to Bentham: Mathematical Economy, Morals and Psychology”, The Manchester School, 70(2): 262-78.

Stein, M. 1992. “Diminishing Marginal Utility of Income and Progressive Taxation: A Critique of The Uneasy Case”, Northern Illinois University Law Review, 12: 373-397

Stigler, G. and Becker, G. 1977. “De Gustibus non est Disputandum”, The American Economic Review, 67: 76-90.

Stiglitz, J. 1987. “Pareto Efficient and Optimal Taxation and the New Welfare Economics”, in A. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds), Handbook of Public Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pages 991-1042.

Sugden R. 1981. The Political Economy of Public Choice, Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Turk, M. 2012. “The Mathematical Turn in Economics: Walras, the French Mathematicians, and the Road not Taken”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34: 149–167.

Usher, D. 1980. The Measurement of Economic Growth, Oxford: Blackwell.

Usher, D. 2016. "A Utilitarian Measure of Economic Growth," Queen’s University Economics Department Working Paper, No 1356: 1-14.

Van den Bergh, J. 2009. “The GDP Paradox”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2): 117–135.

Van Praag, B. 1991. “Ordinal and cardinal utility: An integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept”, Journal of Econometrics, 50: 69-89.

Van Staveren, I. 2008. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Ethics and Economics”, Review of Political Economy, 20(2): 159-161.

Varian, H. 2010. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach, 8th edition, New York: W. W. Norton.

Von Neumann, J., and Morgenstern, O. 1944. The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1947

Walras, L. 1874 [1965]. Elements of Pure Economics, transl. by W. Jaffe, London: Allen and Unwin.

Walsh, V. 2008. “Freedom, Values and Sen: Towards a Morally Enriched Classical Economic Theory”, Review of Political Economy, 20:2: 199-232

Weber, M. 1949 [1984]. “Objectivity and Understanding in Economics”, in D. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weintraub, E.R. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

Wicksteed, P. 1910 [1933]. The Common Sense of Political Economy, London: Routledge.

Winch, D. 1972. “Marginalism and the Boundaries of Economic Science”, History of Political Economy, 4: 325-343.

Wight, J. 2015. Ethics in Economics, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Wishloff, J. 2009. “The Land of Realism and the Shipwreck of Idea-ism: Thomas Aquinas and Milton Friedman on the Social Responsibilities of Business”, Journal of Business Ethics, 85: 137-155.