Li, Chenxing and Zhang, Zehua and Zhao, Ran (2023): Volatility or higher moments: Which is more important in return density forecasts of stochastic volatility model?
Preview |
PDF
Realized_Stochastic_Volatility_Model_with_Implied_Volatility (1).pdf Download (308kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The stochastic volatility (SV) model has been one of the most popular models for latent stock return volatility. Extensions of the SV model focus on either improving volatility inference or modeling higher moments of the return distribution. This study investigates which extension can better improve return density forecasts. By examining various specifications with S&P 500 daily returns for nearly 20 years, we find that a more accurate capture of volatility dynamics with realized volatility and implied volatility is more important than modeling higher moments for a conventional SV model in terms of both density and tail forecasts. The accuracy of volatility estimation and forecasts should be the precondition for higher moments extensions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Volatility or higher moments: Which is more important in return density forecasts of stochastic volatility model? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Stochastic volatility, realized volatility, implied volatility, MCMC, density forecast |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C11 - Bayesian Analysis: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G17 - Financial Forecasting and Simulation |
Item ID: | 118459 |
Depositing User: | Dr Chenxing Li |
Date Deposited: | 13 Sep 2023 13:24 |
Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2023 13:25 |
References: | Andersen, T. G. and Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 885–905. Andersen, T. G. and Teräsvirta, T. (2009). Realized volatility. In: Handbook of Financial Time Series. Springer, 555–575. Asai, M., Chang, C.-L., and McAleer, M. (2017). Realized stochastic volatility with general asymmetry and long memory. Journal of Econometrics 199(2), 202–212. Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. (1997). Normal inverse Gaussian distributions and stochastic volatility modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 24(1), 1–13. Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. and Shephard, N. (2001). Non-Gaussian Ornstein-Uhlenbeck-based models and some of their uses in financial economics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 63(2), 167–241. Becker, R., Clements, A. E., and White, S. I. (2007). Does implied volatility provide any information beyond that captured in model-based volatility forecasts? Journal of Banking & Finance 31(8), 2535–2549. Blair, B. J., Poon, S.-H., and Taylor, S. J. (2001). Forecasting S&P 100 volatility: the incremental information content of implied volatilities and high-frequency index returns. Journal of Econometrics 105(1), 5–26. Bollerslev, T., Tauchen, G., and Zhou, H. (2009). Expected stock returns and variance risk premia. Review of Financial Studies 22(11), 4463–4492. Buccheri, G. and Corsi, F. (2021). HARK the SHARK: Realized volatility modeling with measurement errors and nonlinear dependencies. Journal of Financial Econometrics 19(4), 614–649. Busch, T., Christensen, B. J., and Nielsen, M. Ø. (2011). The role of implied volatility in forecasting future realized volatility and jumps in foreign exchange, stock, and bond markets. Journal of Econometrics 160(1), 48–57. Carr, P. and Wu, L. (2009). Variance risk premiums. The Review of Financial Studies 22(3), 1311–1341. Chib, S., Nardari, F., and Shephard, N. (2002). Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods for stochastic volatility models. Journal of Econometrics 108(2), 281–316. Christensen, B. J. and Prabhala, N. R. (1998). The relation between implied and realized volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 50(2), 125–150. Corsi, F. (2009). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics 7(2), 174–196. Hansen, P. R., Huang, Z., and Shek, H. H. (2012). Realized GARCH: a joint model for returns and realized measures of volatility. Journal of Applied Econometrics 27(6), 877–906. Jensen, M. J. and Maheu, J. M. (2010). Bayesian semiparametric stochastic volatility modeling. Journal of Econometrics 157(2), 306–316. Kalli, M., Walker, S. G., and Damien, P. (2013). Modeling the Conditional Distribution of Daily Stock Index Returns: An Alternative Bayesian Semiparametric Model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 31(4), 371–383. Kambouroudis, D. S., McMillan, D. G., and Tsakou, K. (2016). Forecasting stock return volatility: A comparison of GARCH, implied volatility, and realized volatility models. Journal of Futures Markets 36(12), 1127–1163. Kambouroudis, D. S., McMillan, D. G., and Tsakou, K. (2021). Forecasting realized volatility: The role of implied volatility, leverage effect, overnight returns, and volatility of realized volatility. Journal of Futures Markets 41(10), 1618–1639. Kim, S., Shephard, N., and Chib, S. (1998). Stochastic volatility: likelihood inference and comparison with ARCH models. Review of Economic Studies 65(3), 361–393. Koopman, S. J., Jungbacker, B., and Hol, E. (2005). Forecasting daily variability of the S&P 100 stock index using historical, realised and implied volatility measurements. Journal of Empirical Finance 12(3), 445–475. Koopman, S. J. and Scharth, M. (2012). The analysis of stochastic volatility in the presence of daily realized measures. Journal of Financial Econometrics 11(1), 76–115. Liesenfeld, R. and Jung, R. C. (2000). Stochastic volatility models: conditional normality versus heavy-tailed distributions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15(2), 137–160. Lyócsa, Š. and Todorova, N. (2020). Trading and non-trading period realized market volatility: Does it matter for forecasting the volatility of US stocks? International Journal of Forecasting 36(2), 628–645. Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 347–370. Patton, A. J. (2011). Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. Journal of Econometrics 160(1), 246–256. Patton, A. J., Ziegel, J. F., and Chen, R. (2019). Dynamic semiparametric models for expected shortfall (and value-at-risk). Journal of Econometrics 211(2), 388–413. Schwert, G. W. and Seguin, P. J. (1990). Heteroskedasticity in stock returns. Journal of Finance 45(4), 1129–1155. Shirota, S., Hizu, T., and Omori, Y. (2014). Realized stochastic volatility with leverage and long memory. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 76, 618–641. Takahashi, M., Omori, Y., and Watanabe, T. (2009). Estimating stochastic volatility models using daily returns and realized volatility simultaneously. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 53(6), 2404–2426. Taylor, J. W. (2019). Forecasting value-at-risk and expected shortfall using a semiparametric approach based on the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 37(1), 121–133. Taylor, S. J. (1982). Financial returns modelled by the product of two stochastic processes - a study of the daily sugar prices 1961-75. Time Series Analysis: Theory and Practice 1, 203–226. Yu, J. (2012). A semiparametric stochastic volatility model. Journal of Econometrics 167(2), 473–482. Zhang, Z. and Zhao, R. (2023). Improving the asymmetric stochastic volatility model with ex-post volatility: the identification of the asymmetry. Quantitative Finance 23(1), 35–51. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/118459 |