Hazans, Mihails and Holmen, Rasmus Bøgh and Upenieks, Jānis and Žabko, Oksana (2024): Regional inequalities in access to STEM-oriented secondary education in Latvia.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_120646.pdf Download (907kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Education scholars and human geographers have extensively studied spatial disparities in access to secondary education, both in developing countries and in advanced economies. However, very few studies have analysed access to specific types of secondary education, particularly programs oriented toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM-oriented programs). This paper aims to fill this gap using rich geodata and administrative data on Latvia. An overview of the supply of STEM-related skills in the Nordic-Baltic region suggests that in this regard Latvia performs the worst in terms of both recent university graduates and working-age population in general. We show that 43 percent of youth aged 15 to 18 cannot reach a STEM program within 30 minutes by walking. Furthermore, estimates of earnings differentials by access time, between program types, and between two modes of travel suggest that children from wealthier families have better access to STEM programs. More densely populated settlements feature better access to STEM programs, as well as better exam results in STEM disciplines, while language exam results do not show such a pattern.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Regional inequalities in access to STEM-oriented secondary education in Latvia |
English Title: | Regional inequalities in access to STEM-oriented secondary education in Latvia |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Access to secondary education, STEM-oriented programs, regional disparities, geographic information system |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I24 - Education and Inequality I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I28 - Government Policy R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R53 - Public Facility Location Analysis ; Public Investment and Capital Stock |
Item ID: | 120646 |
Depositing User: | Mihails Hazans |
Date Deposited: | 23 Apr 2024 06:44 |
Last Modified: | 23 Apr 2024 06:44 |
References: | Alexander, M. and Massaro, V. A. (2020). School deserts: Visualizing the death of the neighborhood school. Policy Futures in Education, 18(6), 787–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320951063 Alloway, N., & Dalley-Trim, L. (2009). “High and dry” in rural Australia: Obstacles to student aspirations and expectations. Rural Society, 19(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.5172/rsj.351.19.1.49 Atkinson, R. D., Hugo, J., Lundgren, D., Shapiro, M. J., & Thomas, J. (2007). Addressing the STEM challenge by expanding specialty math and science high schools. NCSSSMST Journal, 12(2), 14–23. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ855272.pdf Baumann, C. & Winzar, H. (2016). The role of secondary education in explaining competitiveness, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2014.924387 Bernard, R. M. et al. (2004). How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307400337 Berry, C. R., & West, M. R. (2010). Growing Pains: The School Consolidation Movement and Student Outcomes, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26 (1), 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewn015 Borge, L.-E., Kråkenes, T., & Nyhus, O. H. (2020). Effektivitet i kommunale tjenester: Analyser for 2017-2018. SØF-rapport nr. 05/20. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/611720af81ac40508c649bd466089af2/sof-r-05_20.pdf Bottia, M. C., Stearns, E., Mickelson, R. A., & Moller, S. (2017). Boosting the numbers of STEM majors? The role of high schools with a STEM program. Science Education, 102(1), 85–107. doi:10.1002/sce.21318 Cedering, M., & Wihlborg, E. (2020). Village schools as a hub in the community - A time-geographical analysis of the closing of two rural schools in southern Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 606-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.007 Chang, A. C. et al. (2022). Seattle Children's Virtual Research Training Program: Pivoting to Remote Science Education for High School Students. The Journal of STEM Outreach 4 (2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v4i2.02 Chetty, R. et al. (2011), “How does your kindergarten classroom affect your earnings? Evidence from Project STAR”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (4), 1593–1660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr041 Chillón, P. et al. (2015). A longitudinal study of the distance that young people walk to school. Health & Place, 31, 133 – 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.013 Christiaanse, S. (2020). Rural facility decline: A longitudinal accessibility analysis questioning the focus of Dutch depopulation-policy. Applied Geography, 121, Article 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102251 Crawley, E. et al. (2020). Universities as Engines of Economic Development. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47549-9 Das, B., & Das, A. (2021). Is distance to secondary school a barrier to secondary and higher education in India? Millennial Asia. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996211035073 Dickerson, A. & McIntosh, S. (2013). The impact of distance to nearest education institution on the post-compulsory education participation decision. Urban Studies, 50(4), 742–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012455717 Dynarski, S., Hyman, J., & Schanzenbach, D. (2013). Experimental evidence on the effect of childhood investments on postsecondary attainment and degree completion. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32 (4), 692–717, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.21715 Falch, T., Lujala, P., & Strøm, B. (2013). Geographical constraints and educational attainment. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.06.007 Fargas-Malet, M. & Bagley, C. (2021) Is small beautiful? A scoping review of 21st-century research on small rural schools in Europe, European Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211022202 Farrington, J., & Farrington, C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.10.002 Fonseca, L., & Nieth, L. (2021). The role of universities in regional development strategies: A comparison across actors and policy stages. European Urban and Regional Studies, 28(3), 298-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776421999743 Hazans, M. (2004). Does Commuting Reduce Wage Disparities? Growth and Change, 2004, 35 (3), 360-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2004.00253.x Hazans, M. (2010). Teacher Pay, Class Size and Local Governments: Evidence from the Latvian Reform. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5291, http://ftp.iza.org/dp5291.pdf Hazans, M. (2019). Emigration from Latvia: a brief history and driving forces in the twenty-first century. In: Kaša, R., Mieriņa, I. (eds). The Emigrant Communities of Latvia: National Identity, Transnational Belonging, and Diaspora Politics. Berlin - Heidelberg: Springer Open (2019), 35-68. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-12092-4_3 Hazans, M., Masso, J., & Maurseth, P. B. (2023). Human values and selection into supervisory positions: Evidence from nine European countries. IZA Discussion Paper No. 16643. https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/16643 Kenyon, S. (2011). Transport and social exclusion: Access to higher education in the UK policy context. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 763–771 Kivi, L. H., Paas, (2021). T. Spatial interactions of employment in European labour markets. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 12, 196–211. https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-SI09 Kvalsund, R. (2019). Bigger or Better? Research-Based Reflections on the Cultural Deconstruction of Rural Schools in Norway: Metaperspectives. In: Jahnke, H., Kramer, C., & Meusburger, P. (eds). Geographies of Schooling. Knowledge and Space, vol 14. Springer: Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18799-6_10 Lind, T. (2019). Upper Secondary Schools and Sparsity: The Case of Northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1375005 Lind, T., & Stjernström, O. (2015). Organizational challenges for schools in rural municipalities: Cross-national comparisons in a Nordic context. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 30(5), 1–14 Lundahl, L., Arnesen, A.-L., & Jónasson, J. T. (2018). Justice and marketization of education in three Nordic countries: can existing large-scale datasets support comparisons? Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(3), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2018.1542908 Lynch, S. J., Burton, E. P., Behrend, T., et al. (2018). Understanding inclusive STEM high schools as opportunity structures for underrepresented students: Critical components. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55: 712–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21437 Mann, B., & Saultz, A. (2019). The Role of Place, Geography, and Geographic Information Systems in Educational Research. AERA Open, 5(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419869340 Moreno-Monroy, A. I., Lovelace, R., & Ramos, F. R. (2018). Public transport and school location impacts on educational inequalities: Insights from São Paulo. Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.012 Musset, P. (2012). School Choice and Equity: Current Policies in OECD Countries and a Literature Review, OECD Education Working Papers, 66, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fq23507vc-en Newbold, K. B., & Brown, W. M. (2015). The urban–rural gap in university attendance: determinants of university participation among Canadian youth. Journal of Regional Science, 55, 585–608 OECD (2018). Responsive School Systems: Connecting Facilities, Sectors and Programmes for Student Success. OECD Reviews of School Resources, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264306707-en OECD (2020). Education Policy Outlook. Norway. July 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5cc2d673-en Rødseth, K., Førsund, F., Holmen, R. B., & Kittelsen, S. (2022). Forbedringspotensial ved måling av effektivitet i kommunal sector [Potential for improvement in efficiency measurement on the municipal sector, in Norwegian]. TØI-rapport 1879/2022. https://www.toi.no/getfile.php?mmfileid=72865 Sasson, A., & Blomgren, A. (2011). Knowledge based oil and gas industry. BI Norwegian Business School. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/94212 Šūpule, I., & Søholt, S. (2018). Rural Municipalities and Change in Local School Structure: Comparing Room for Manoeuvre among Rural Municipalities in Latvia and Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(7), 1070–1085. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1476916 Talen, E. (2001). School, Community, and Spatial Equity: An Empirical Investigation of Access to Elementary Schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00254 Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). The economic impact of universities: Evidence from across the globe. Economics of Education Review, 68 (1), 53–67. Van Maarseveen, R. (2021). The urban–rural education gap: do cities indeed make us smarter? Journal of Economic Geography, 21 (5), 683–714, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbaa033 Vasconcellos, E. A. (1997). Rural transport and access to education in developing countries: Policy issues. Journal of Transport Geography, 5(2), 127–136 Yoon, E.-S., Gulson, K., & Lubienski, C. (2018). A Brief History of the Geography of Education Policy: Ongoing Conversations and Generative Tensions. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418820940 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/120646 |