Kohnert, Dirk (1983): Zehn Thesen über die Stärken und Schwächen des soziokulturellen Ansatzes in der Entwicklungspolitik. Published in: Loccumer Protokolle , Vol. 27, No. 1983 : pp. 25-32.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_122000.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Giving priority to the socio-cultural approach in development planning would increase rather than alleviate poverty and exploitation in Third World countries. Poverty is mainly due to a lack of resources (class specific) and to unequal power relations, not to imposed western consumption patterns. Value systems can only be understood in terms of their historical development, i.e. they have grown in response to and in interaction with material processes of civilisation and social differentiation. It is only by analysing this process of socio-structural differentiation that the real needs of the poor in the Third World can be identified and taken into account.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Zehn Thesen über die Stärken und Schwächen des soziokulturellen Ansatzes in der Entwicklungspolitik |
English Title: | Ten theses on the strengths and weaknesses of the socio-cultural approach in development policy |
Language: | German |
Keywords: | Development Planning; Development Aid; ODA; Third World; Sub-Sahahran Africa; socio-cultural development; poverty; civilization;socio-economic differentiation; |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F53 - International Agreements and Observance ; International Organizations F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F54 - Colonialism ; Imperialism ; Postcolonialism N - Economic History > N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation > N47 - Africa ; Oceania O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy |
Item ID: | 122000 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Dirk Kohnert |
Date Deposited: | 13 Sep 2024 13:44 |
Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 13:44 |
References: | Adorno, T.W, et al., "Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie"‚ Berlin, 1969 Bernstein, M., "Sociology of Underdevelopment vs. Sociology of of Development?", in: Lehmann, D. (ed.)‚ "Development Theory - Four Critical Studies", F, Cass., London, 1979:77-106 Böll, W., "Gegen den Mythos der Konsumzivilisation – Kultureller Zusammenarbeit mit der Dritten Welt", Das Parlament, 9,./16.1.1982 Braun, G./Hanf, T./Illy, H.F, et al:, “Sozio-kulturelle Bedingungen und Auswirkungen der Entwicklungspolitik – Zur Relevanz der sozio-kulturellen Dimension", unveröffentlichte Studie des BMZ, 1981 Braun, G., "Ansätze einer alternativen Entwicklung – Grundbedürfnisse und Weltzivilisation", Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit (E+Z), 24.1983.7:4-6 Faris, J.C,, "Pax Britannica and the Sudan: S.F. Nadel", in: Talal Asad (ed.), "Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter”, New York, 1973: 153-70 Yrank, A.G,., "Sociology of Development and Underdevelopment of Sociology", in: Cockecroft, J.D. ect al., "Dependence and Underdevelopment", New York, 1972:321-398 Hauck, G., "Das Elend der bürgerlichen Entwicklungstheorie", in: Tibi, B. et al. (eds.), "Handbuch 2, Unterentwicklung, Frankfurt, 1975:36-63 Kantowsky, D., "Zerstörung bedeutet Wachstum", Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit (E+Z), 1982.2:6-7 Nohlen, D., "Modernization and Dependence - 'An Outline and Critique of Competing Theories", Intereconomics, March/ April 1980:81-85 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122000 |