Ozili, Peterson K (2025): Digital markets: formative components, regulation, challenges and insights from the EU Digital Markets Act. Forthcoming in:
![]() |
PDF
MPRA_paper_123813.pdf Download (497kB) |
Abstract
There has been very little policy or academic discussion or debate about the value of digital markets in the literature. Most debates in the literature focus on the large technological companies that operate in digital markets, but there are no discussions or debates in the literature about the value proposition and formative components of digital markets. This study examines digital markets, their formative components, regulation and challenges. It also presents a concise definition of “digital markets” and suggests a link between digital markets and digital financial inclusion. It analyses the regulation of digital markets, particularly the recent EU Digital Markets Act, and show that regulation focus mostly on large technological companies. The study also shows the benefits of digital market regulation for users of digital markets and the demerits of the large technological companies who own the world’s largest digital transactional platforms in digital markets. The criticisms of regulating large technological companies are also identified.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Digital markets: formative components, regulation, challenges and insights from the EU Digital Markets Act |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | digital markets, digital technology, internet, platform, regulation, large technological companies, EU Digital Markets Act, digital innovation. |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 123813 |
Depositing User: | Dr Peterson K Ozili |
Date Deposited: | 10 Mar 2025 08:30 |
Last Modified: | 10 Mar 2025 08:30 |
References: | Akman, P. (2021). Regulating competition in digital platform markets: A critical assessment of the framework and approach of the EU Digital Markets Act. Anderson, J., & Mariniello, M. (2021). Regulating big tech: the Digital Markets Act. Bruegel-Blogs, Brussels. Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND journal of economics, 37(3), 668-691. Ashima, A., & Kumar, K. M. (2024). Crowd Dynamics in Shaping the Historic Urban Core. A Case of the Chalai Market, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Reimagining Public Spaces and Built Environments in the Post-Pandemic World, 158. Basu, K., Caspi, A., & Hockett, R. C. (2021). Markets and regulation in the age of big tech. Capitalism & Society, 15(1). Birch, K., & Cochrane, D. T. (2022). Big tech: Four emerging forms of digital rentiership. Science as Culture, 31(1), 44-58. Bradford, A. (2023). Digital empires: The global battle to regulate technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Brühl, V. (2023). Big Tech, the platform economy and the European digital markets. Intereconomics, 58(5), 274-282. Cabral, L., Haucap, J., Parker, G., Petropoulos, G., Valletti, T. M., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2021). The EU digital markets act: a report from a panel of economic experts. Calvano, E., & Polo, M. (2021). Market power, competition and innovation in digital markets: A survey. Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100853. Cennamo, C. (2021). Competing in digital markets: A platform-based perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 265-291. Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2019). Digital marketing. Pearson UK, London. Crisanto, J. C., Ehrentraud, J., Lawson, A., & Restoy, F. (2021). Big tech regulation: what is going on?. Bank for International Settlements, Financial Stability Institute, Basel, Switzerland. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3): 319–340, doi:10.2307/249008, JSTOR 249008, S2CID 12476939 Davis, F. D., Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2024). The technology acceptance model: 30 years of TAM. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG. de Clercq, M., D'Haese, M., & Buysse, J. (2023). Economic growth and broadband access: The European urban-rural digital divide. Telecommunications Policy, 47(6), 102579. Eden, L. (1998). Taxing multinationals: Transfer pricing and corporate income taxation in North America. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. Felix, S.A. (2022). Big Tech Companies’ Unprecedented Success and the Abuse of Dominance in the EU and the US: A Comparative Analysis. Southampton Student Law Review, 12, 137. EU (2003). Competition Policy. Regulation 1/2003. European Union Commission, Brussels. Girling, P. X. (2022). Operational risk management: a complete guide for banking and fintech. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey. Gupta, A., & Nair, A. (2023). Unpacking Digital Public Infrastructure: Navigating Conceptual Ambiguities. T20 Policy Brief. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. Hansson, M. (2024). Price Discovery in Constant Product Markets. Available at SSRN 4582649. Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Setzke, D. S., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic markets, 30, 87-98. Horowitz, M. C., Kahn, L., Macdonald, J., & Schneider, J. (2024). Adopting AI: how familiarity breeds both trust and contempt. AI & society, 39(4), 1721-1735. Hu, Y., & Xu, N. (2023, May). Digital Innovation Networks: Theory Building and Future Research. In 8th International Conference on Financial Innovation and Economic Development (ICFIED 2023) (pp. 552-561). Atlantis Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/123813 |