Peer Interactions in Teams and their Spill-over Effect: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment

Batsaikhan, mongoljin and Kamei, Kenju (2025): Peer Interactions in Teams and their Spill-over Effect: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment.

Abstract

Team-based collaboration is integral to education, work, and daily life, fostering ability-driven peer effects through discussions, social comparisons, and knowledge sharing. Despite extensive evidence of peer effects in specific contexts, their broader impacts on comparable but different activities remain underexplored. Our study addresses this gap using a novel dataset from Mongolia that combines a natural field experiment in classrooms, university entrance examination scores, and grade point averages in the university. First-year undergraduate students were randomly paired to collaboratively complete weekly assignments throughout a course. Low-ability students (based on their entrance exam scores) paired with high-ability peers significantly improved their academic performance not only in the specific course but also in other concurrent courses, showing strong spillover effects. The magnitude of the spill-over relative to the direct effect was 0.723. These pairings had no adverse effects on high-ability students. The findings highlight the Pareto efficiency of peer interactions in groups with large ability differences and offer insights into improving productivity and learning through ability-based spillovers.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: peer effects, spillover effects, a natural field experiment, teamwork
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M53 - Training; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M54 - Labor Management

References

Arcidiacono, Peter, Josh Kinsler, and Joseph Price, 2017. Productivity Spillovers in Team Production: Evidence from Professional Basketball. Journal of Labor Economics 35(1): 191-225.

Ariely, Dan, Anat Bracha, and Stephan Meier, 2009. Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially. American Economic Review 99: 544-555.

Arnold, Ivo and Jerry Straten, 2012. Motivation and Math Skills as Determinants of First-Year Performance in Economics. Journal of Economic Education 43(1): 33-47.

Azoulay, Pierre, Joshua Graff Zivin, and Jialan Wang, 2010. Superstar Extinction. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(2): 549-589.

Ballard, Charles, and Marianne Johnson, 2004. Basic Math Skills and Performance in an Introductory Economics Class. Journal of Economic Education 35(1): 3-23.

Bénabou, Roland, and Jean Tirole. 2006. Incentives and Prosocial Behavior. American Economic Review 96(5): 1652-1678.

Bénabou, Roland, and Jean Tirole. 2011. Identity, Morals, and Taboos: Beliefs as Assets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126(2): 805-855.

Black, Sandra, Paul Devereux, and Kjell Salvanes, 2013. Under Pressure? The Effect of Peers on Outcomes of Young Adults. Journal of Labor Economics 31(1): 119-153.

Booij, Adam, Edwin Leuven, and Hessel Oosterbeek, 2017. Ability Peer Effects in University: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. Review of Economic Studies 84(2): 547-578.

Bowles, Samuel, and Herbert Gintis, 2005. “Prosocial emotions,” in L. Blume, S. Durlauf (Eds.), The Economy as a Complex Evolving System III: Essays in Honor of Kenneth Arrow, Oxford University Press, Oxford: 337-367.

Brune, Lasse, Eric Chyn, and Jason Kerwin, 2022. Peers and Motivation at Work Evidence from a Firm Experiment in Malawi. Journal of Human Resources 57(4): 1147-1177.

Camerer, Colin, Linda Babcock, George Loewenstein, and Richard Thaler, 1997. Labor Supply of New York City Cabdrivers: One Day at a Time. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 407-441.

Carrell, Scott, Bruce Sacerdote, and James West, 2013. From Natural Variation to Optimal Policy? The Importance of Endogenous Peer Group Formation. Econometrica 81(3): 855-882.

Falk, Armin, and Andrea Ichino, 2006. Clean Evidence on Peer Effects. Journal of Labor Economics 24(1): 39-57.

Fehr, Ernst, and Klaus Schmidt, 1999. A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3): 817-868.

Feld, Jan, and Ulf Zölitz, 2017. Understanding Peer Effects: On the Nature, Estimation, and Channels of Peer Effects. Journal of Labor Economics 35(2): 387-428.

Friedman, Daniel, and Shyam Sunder, 1994. Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge University Press.

Hamilton, Barton, Jack Nickerson, and Hideo Owan, 2003. Team Incentives and Worker Heterogeneity: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Teams on Productivity and Participation. Journal of Political Economy 111(3): 465-497.

Jackson, Kirabo, and Elias Bruegmann, 2009. Teaching Students and Teaching Each Other: The Importance of Peer Learning for Teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4): 85-108.

Kamei, Kenju, and John Ashworth, 2023. Peer Learning in Teams and Work Performance: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 207: 413-32.

Kamei, Kenju, and Thomas Markussen, 2023. Free Riding and Workplace Democracy—Heterogeneous Task Preferences and Sorting. Management Science 69(7):3884-3904.

Kimbrough, Erik, Andrew McGee, and Hitoshi Shigeoka, 2022. How Do Peers Impact Learning? An Experimental Investigation of Peer-to-Peer Teaching and Ability Tracking. Journal of Human Resources 57: 304-339.

Kleibergen, Frank, and Richard Paap, 2006. Generalized Reduced Rank Tests using the Singular Value Decomposition. Journal of econometrics 133(1): 97-126.

Langer, Ellen, 1975. The Illusion of Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2): 311-328.

Larkin, Ian, Lamar Pierce, and Francesca Gino, 2012. The Psychological Costs of Pay-for-Performance: Implications for the Strategic Compensation of Employees. Strategic Management Journal 33(10): 1194-1214.

Lavy, Victor, and Analia Schlosser, 2011. Mechanisms and Impacts of Gender Peer Effects at School. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3(2): 1-33.

Li, Tao, Li Han, Linxiu Zhang, and Scott Rozelle, 2014. Encouraging Classroom Peer Interactions: Evidence from Chinese Migrant Schools. Journal of Public Economics 111: 29-45.

Lu, Fangwen, and Michael Anderson, 2015, Peer Effects in Microenvironments: The Benefits of Homogeneous Classroom Groups. Journal of Labor Economics 33(1): 91-122.

Lyle, David, 2009. The Effects of Peer Group Heterogeneity on the Production of Human Capital at West. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1(4): 69-84.

Mas, Alexandre, and Enrico Moretti, 2009. Peers at Work. American Economic Review 99(1): 112-145.

Sacerdote, Bruce, 2001. Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 681-704.

Sacerdote, Bruce, 2014. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Peer Effects: Two Steps Forward? Annual Review of Economics 6: 253-72.

Svenson, Ola, 1981. Are We All Less Risky and More Skillful than our Fellow Drivers? Acta Psychologica 47: 143-48.

Thaler, Richard, 1999. Mental Accounting Matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12(3): 183-206.

Wu, Jia, Junsen Zhang, and Chunchao Wang, 2023. Student Performance, Peer Effects, and Friend Networks: Evidence from a Randomized Peer Intervention. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 15 (1): 510-42.