van den Hauwe, Ludwig (2008): Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_12991.pdf Download (221kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Despite the distinctive character of the Austrian approach to “microfoundations for macroeconomics”, the literature on free banking contains a number of arguments which make use of game-theoretic concepts and models such as the well-known Prisoner´s Dilemma model. While there can be no general a priori presumption against the possible usefulness of game-theoretic concepts for Austrian theorizing, in the context of the debate on free banking such concepts and models have been used with varying degrees of perspicacity. One example which is elaborated in the paper is concerned with the interaction configuration between independent banks in a fractional-reserve free banking system, which has sometimes been modeled as a One-Shot Prisoner´s Dilemma. This conceptualization does not provide a sufficient argument for the in-concert overexpansion thesis, nor for the thesis that fractional-reserve free banking will tend to lead to the establishment of a central bank. The author drops the implicit assumption that there exists a one-to-one correspondence between the outcome matrix and the utility matrix. When it is acknowledged that banks in a fractional-reserve free banking system need not necessarily adopt a “myopic”, self-regarding perspective but may recognize the long-run harmony of interests between the banking sector and society at large, a different conceptualization and a different matrix representation emerge.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Free Banking; Business Cycle Theory; Prisoner´s Dilemma; Mechanism Design; |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E66 - General Outlook and Conditions E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E42 - Monetary Systems ; Standards ; Regimes ; Government and the Monetary System ; Payment Systems E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E31 - Price Level ; Inflation ; Deflation G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G18 - Government Policy and Regulation E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K39 - Other |
Item ID: | 12991 |
Depositing User: | Ludwig M. P. Van Den Hauwe, BSc, MSc, PhD |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jan 2009 06:12 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 09:51 |
References: | Arnold, L. G. (2002), Business Cycle Theory, Oxford University Press; Axelrod, R. (1984 (1990)), The Evolution of Co-operation, Penguin Books; Backhaus, J. G. (1999), The Elgar Companion to Law and Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; Campbell, D. E. (2006), Incentives – Motivation and the Economics of Information, Cambridge University Press; Carilli, A. M. and G. M. Dempster (2001), ‘Expectations in Austrian Business Cycle Theory: An Application of the Prisoner´s Dilemma’, The Review of Austrian Economics, 14: 319-330; Field, B. C. (1989), ‘The Evolution of Property Rights’, Kyklos, Vol. 42, 319-45; Foss, N. (2000), ‘Austrian Economics and Game Theory: A Stocktaking and an Evaluation’, The Review of Austrian Economics, 13: 41-58; Garrison, R. W. (2001), Time and Money – The Macroeconomics of Capital Structure, London: Routledge; Garrison, R. W. (2005), The Austrian School, in: Snowdon, B. and H. R. Vane, op. cit., 474-516; Friedman, M. and A. J. Schwartz (1963 [1993]), A Monetary History of the United States 1867-1960, Princeton University Press; Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162: 1243-8; Horwitz, S. (2000), Microfoundations and Macroeconomics – An Austrian Perspective, London: Routledge; Huerta de Soto, J. (2006), Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute; Hülsmann, J. G. (2000), ‘Economic Principles and Monetary Institutions – Review Essay on The Theory of Monetary Institutions by L. H. White’, Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, Vol. 10, no. 2/3, 421-441; Kreps, D. M., P. Milgrom, J. Roberts, and R. Wilson (1982), ‘Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated Prisoner´s Dilemma’, Journal of Economic Theory 27, 245-52; Lachmann, L. M. (1973), Macro-economic Thinking and the Market Economy, London: The Institute of Economic Affairs; Landsburg, S. E. (2002), Price Theory & Applications, South-Western; Mas-Colell, A., M. D. Whinston and J. R. Green (1995) Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press; Mises, Ludwig von (1998), Human Action – A Treatise on Economics, Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute; Müller, C. and M. Tietzel (1999), Property rights and their partitioning, in: Backhaus, J. G. (op. cit.), 40-52; Myerson, R. B. (1991), Game Theory – Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press; Papandreou, A. (1994), Externality and Institutions, Oxford: Clarendon Press; Pellikaan, H. (1994), Anarchie, Staat en het Prisoner´s Dilemma, Delft: Eburon; Poundstone, W. (1992), Prisoner´s Dilemma, New York: Doubleday; Sechrest, L. J. (1993), Free Banking – Theory, History, and a Laissez-Faire Model, London: Quorum Books; Selgin, G. A. (1988), The Theory of Free Banking – Money Supply under Competitive Note Issue, Rowman & Littlefield; Snowdon, B. and H. R. Vane (2005), Modern Macroeconomics – Its Origins, Development and Current State, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007), Prisoner´s Dilemma, on-line version; White, L. H. (1989), Competition and Currency – Essays on Free Banking and Money, New York: New York University Press; White, L. H. (1995), Free Banking in Britain – Theory, Experience, and Debate 1800-1845 (Second Edition), London: The Institute of Economic Affairs; White, L. H. (1999), The Theory of Monetary Institutions, Oxford: Blackwell; |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/12991 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design. (deposited 07 May 2008 07:21)
-
Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design. (deposited 16 May 2008 00:29)
-
Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design. (deposited 23 May 2008 01:05)
- Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design. (deposited 25 Jan 2009 06:12) [Currently Displayed]
-
Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design. (deposited 23 May 2008 01:05)
-
Credit Expansion, the Prisoner´s Dilemma, and Free Banking as Mechanism Design. (deposited 16 May 2008 00:29)