The great dissolution: organization capital and diverging volatility puzzle

Che, Natasha Xingyuan (2009): The great dissolution: organization capital and diverging volatility puzzle.

Abstract

Most traditional explanations for the decreasing aggregate output volatility - so-called "Great Moderation" - fail to accommodate, or even directly contradict, another aspect of empirical data: the average sales volatility for publicly-traded US firms has been increasing during the same period. The paper aims to reconcile the opposite trends of firm-level and aggregate volatilities.

I argue that the rise of organization capital, or firm-specific intangible capital, is the origin of the volatility divergence. Firms in the modern economy have been investing heavily in intangible and organizational assets, such as R&D, management processes, intellectual property, software, and brand name - the "soft" capitals that distinguish a firm from the sum of its physical properties.

Most intangible assets are firm-specific, inseparable from the company that originally produced them, and difficult to trade on outside market. Investing in these organization-specific capitals insulates a firm from market-wide shocks, but introduces higher firm-specific risk that does not equally affect its peers. When value creation is increasingly relying on organization capital, the impact of idiosyncratic risk factor rises, while that of general risk factor declines. The former elevates firm-level volatility; the latter reduces aggregate volatility, mainly through weakening the positive co-movements among firms. Therefore, the decrease in aggregate output volatility is not because of less turbulent macro environment, but a result of more heterogeneity among production units. In this sense, the Great Moderation is rather a story of "Great Dissolution". It may indicate greater economic uncertainty faced by individual agents, instead of less.

My empirical investigation found that, consistent with the paper's hypotheses, firm-level volatility increases with organizational investment, but general factors' impact on firm performance and a firm's correlation with others decrease with organizational investment. Simulations of the general equilibrium model featuring organization capital investment are capable of replicating the volatility trends at both aggregate and firm level for the past two decades.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: organization capital, intangible capital, great moderation, firm volatility, business cycle, business investment
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity; D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E10 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E23 - Production; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity

References

Bashein, B.J., Markus, M.L., and Riley, P. “business reengineering: preconditions for BPR success, and how to prevent failure.” Information systems management, 1994, 11(2), 7-13.

Danthine, J.P. and Jin, X.: Intangible Capital, corporate valuation and asset pricing. Economic Theory 32, 157-177 (2007)

Cooley, T.F. and Prescott, E.C.: Economic growth and business cycle. In: Cooley, T.F. (ed): Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1995)

Corrado, C., Hulten, C.R., Sichel, D.E.: Intangible capital and economic growth. Finance and Economics discussion series 2006-24, the Federal Reserve Board (2006)

McGrattan, E.R., Prescott, E.C.: Unmeasured investment and the puzzling US boom in the 1990s. Research department staff report 369, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (2007)

Davis, S.J, Kahn, J.A.: Interpreting the great moderation: changes in the volatility of economic activity at the macro and micro levels. NBER Working Paper No. 14048 (2008)

Davis, S.J., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., Miranda, J.: Volatility and dispersion in business growth rates: publicly traded versus privately held firms. NBER Working Paper No. 12354 (2006)

Chun, H., Kim, J., Morck, R., Yeung, B.: Creative destruction and firm-specific performance heterogeneity. NBER Working Paper No. 13011 (2007)

Atkeson, A., Kehoe, P: Modeling and measuring organization capital. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 113, no. 5, 1026-1053 (2005)

Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., Krusell, P.: Long-run implications of investment-specific technological change. The American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 3, 342-362 (1997)

Comin, D., Mulani, S.: A theory of growth and volatility at the aggregate and firm level. NBER Working Paper No. 11503 (2006)

Comin, D., Philippon, T.: The rise in firm-level volatility: causes and consequences. NBER Working Paper No. 11388 (2005)

Comin, D., Mulani, S.: Diverging trends in aggregate and firm volatility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(2), 374-383 (2006)

Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P.L.: Vintage organization capital. NBER Working Paper No. 8166 (2001)

Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, E.L., Yang, S.: Intangible assets: computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 137-198 (2002)

Brynjolfsson, E.: Information assets, technology, and organization. Management Science, vol. 40, No. 12, 1645-1662 (1994)

Corrado, C., Hulten, C., Sichel, D.: Measuring capital and technology: an expanded framework. In Measuring Capital in the New Economy, C. Corrado, J. Haltiwanger, D. Sichel, eds., Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 65. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press (2005)

Hall, R.E.: Struggling to understand the stock market. The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 91, 1-11 (2001a)

Hall, R.E.: The stock market and capital accumulation. American Economic Review 91, 1185-1202 (2001b)

Lev, B.: Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution (2001)

Nakamura, L.: What is the US gross investment in intangibles? (at least) one trillion dollars a year! Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Working Paper, No. 01-15 (2001)

Atkeson, A., Kehoe, P.: Modeling the transition to a new economy: lessons from two technological revolutions. Research Department Staff Report 296, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (2006)

Prescott, E.C., Visscher, M.: Organization capital. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 88, no. 3, 446-461 (1980)

Thesmar, D., Thoenig, M.: Financial market development and the rise in firm level uncertainty. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4761 (2004)

Philippon, T.: An explanation for the joint evolution of firm and aggregate volatility. Mimeo, Stern-NYU (2003)

Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M.: Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability: evidence and some theory. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 147-180 (2000)

Kahn, J.A., McConnell, M., Perez-Quiros, G.: On the causes of the increased stability of the US economy. Federal Reserve Bank of New York , Economic Policy Review, 8, 183-202 (2002)

Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W.: Has the business cycle changed and why? NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 159-218 (2002)