Nguyen, Quang (2009): choice of remuneration regime in fisheries: the case of Hawaii’s longline fisheries.
Download (231kB) | Preview
One of the most prominent features of remuneration in the Hawaii’s longline fisheries industry has been the norm of share contract regimes. This paper investigates whether the use of share contract regime is positively correlated to increased economic returns. The principal-agent framework is applied to develop a theoretical model for the remuneration choice. Empirical estimation is conducted using a switching regression model that accounts for certain vessel characteristics effects on revenue, depending on remuneration regime used (i.e., share contract or flat wage), as well as the potential selection bias in the vessels’ contractual choice. Key findings from counterfactual simulations indicate: (1) a negative selection into choosing share contracts, and (2) that flat wage vessels would experience significantly higher revenues if they switch to share contracts. Thus, even though the labor market in Hawaii’s longline fisheries relies upon foreign crew members, the results suggest that it would benefit owners of flat wage vessels to apply share contracts to increase their revenues.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||choice of remuneration regime in fisheries: the case of Hawaii’s longline fisheries|
|Keywords:||Remuneration Regime; Longline Fisheries; Hawaii; Commercial Fisheries; Lay System; Crew Shares; Labor Contracts; Incentive Systems|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B21 - Microeconomics
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J33 - Compensation Packages ; Payment Methods
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions
|Depositing User:||Quang Nguyen|
|Date Deposited:||06. Mar 2009 06:09|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 21:26|
Acemoglu, D. 1999 Lecture Notes for Graduate Labor Economics, 14.661, MIT.
Azabou, M; Bouzaiane, L; and Nugent, B.J. 1989. Contractual Choice in Tunisian
Fishing. The New Institutional Economics and Development, North Holland.
Bound, J; Jaeger, A.D; and Baker, M.R. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak”. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(430): 443-450.
Eriksson, T; Teyssier, S; and Villeval, M.C. 2006 “Self-Selection and the Efficiency ofTournaments”. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1983.
FitzRoy, F. R and Kraft, K. 1987. "Cooperation, Profitability and Profit Sharing."Quarterly Journal of Economics 102: 23-35.
Key, N; and McBride, W. 2003. Production Contracts and Productivity in the U.S. Hog Sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(1): 121-133.
Kim, S. Y; Nayga, M.R; Capps, O; and Tepper, B. 1998. Consumer Label Use and Diet Quality: An Endogenous Switching Regression Analysis. Invited Paper presented at the Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium Conference on New Economic Approaches to Consumer Welfare and Nutrition, Alexandria, Virginia, January 14-15, 1999.
Lokshin, M; and Sajaia, Z. 2005. Maximum-likelihood estimation of endogenous switching regression models. The World Bank, US.
Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press.
Mas-Colell, A; Whinston, M; and Green, J. 1995, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press.
Matthiasson, T. 1997. Fixed Wage or Share: Contingent Contract Renewal and Skipper Motivation, Institute for Economic Studies, University of Iceland.
Matthiasson, T. 1999. Cost Sharing and Catch Sharing. Journal of Development Economics, 58(1): 25-44.
McConnell, E. K; and Price, . 2006. “The Lay System in Commercial Fisheries: Origin and Implications”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 51(3): 295-307.
Platteau, J.P; and Nugent, J. 1992. Share Contracts and their Rationale: Lessons from Marine Fishing. The Journal of Development Studies, 28(3): 386-422.
O’Malley, J.M; and Pooley, S.G. 2003. Economic and Operational Characteristics of the Hawaii-Based Longline Fleet in 2000.
Pradhan, N.C; and Leung, P.S. 2004. Modeling trip choice behavior of the longline fishers in Hawaii Fisheries Research 68:209-224.
Plourde, C; and Smith, J.B. 1989. Crop Sharing in the Fishery and Industry Equilibrium. Marine Resources Economics..6: 179-193.
Sutinen, J.G. 1979 “Fishermen’s Remuneration Systems and Implications for Fisheries Development.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy,. 26(2): 147-162.
Wooldridge, J.M. 2004. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 2nd edition,The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Wooldridge, J.M. 2004. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.