Petsas, Iordanis (2008): Sustained Comparative Advantage in a Model of Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_14300.pdf Download (253kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper constructs a two-country (Home and Foreign) general equilibrium model of Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. The scale effects property is removed by introducing two distinct specifications in the knowledge production function: the permanent effect on growth (PEG) specification, which allows policy effects on long-run growth; and the temporary effects on growth (TEG) specification, which generates semi-endogenous long-run economic growth. In the present model, the direction of the effect of the size of innovations on the pattern of trade and Home’s relative wage depends on the way in which the scale effects property is removed. Under the PEG specification, changes in the size of innovations increase Home’s comparative advantage and its relative wage, while under the TEG specification, an increase in the size of innovations increases Home’s relative wage but with an ambiguous effect on its comparative advantage.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Sustained Comparative Advantage in a Model of Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Comparative advantage, Trade, Schumpeterian growth, Scale effects, R&D races |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity |
Item ID: | 14300 |
Depositing User: | Iordanis Petsas |
Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2009 15:08 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 16:43 |
References: | AGHION, P. and HOWITT P. (1998a) Endogenous Growth Theory (Cambridge: MIT Press) ARROYO, C., DINOPOULOS, E., and DONALD, S. (1995), “Schumpeterian Growth and Capital Accumulation: Theory and Evidence” (Manuscript, University of Florida) BARRO, R. and SALA-I-MARTIN, X. (1995) Economic Growth (New York: McGraw-Hill) DINOPOULOS, E. and SEGERSTROM, P. (1999) “A Schumpeterian Model of Protection and Relative Wages”, American Economic Review 89, 450-472 DINOPOULOS, E. and SYROPOULOS, C. (2000), “ Innovation and Rent Protection in the Theory of Schumpeterian Growth” (Manuscript, University of Florida) DINOPOULOS, E. and SYROPOULOS, C. (2001), “Globalization and Scale-Invariant Growth”, (University of Florida, Department of Economics Working Paper) DINOPOULOS, E. and THOMPSON, P. (1996), “A Contribution to the Empirics of Endogenous Growth”, Eastern Economic Journal, 22, 389-400 DINOPOULOS, E. and THOMPSON, P. (1998), “Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects”, Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 313-335 DINOPOULOS, E. and THOMPSON, P. (1999), “Scale Effects in Schumpeterian Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9, 157-185 DORNBUSCH, R., FISCHER S., and SAMUELSON P.A. (1977), “Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods”, American Economic Review, 67, 823-839 GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1990), “Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth”, American Economic Review, 80, 796-815 GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1991a), “Endogenous Product Cycles”, Economic Journal, 101, 1214-1244 GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1991b), “Quality Ladders and Product Cycles”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 425, 557-586 GROSSMAN, G. M. and HELPMAN, E. (1991c), “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth”, Review of Economic Studies, 59, 43-61 HELPMAN, E. and KRUGMAN P. R. (1989), Trade Policy and Market Structure. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) JONES, C. (1995a), “Time-Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 495-525 JONES, C. (1995b), “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759-784 KRUGMAN, P. R. (1987), “The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease and the Competitive Consequences of Mrs. Thatcher”, Journal of Development Economics, 27, 41-55 SEGERSTROM, P. (1998), “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects”, American Economic Review, 88, 1290-1310 SEGERSTROM, P. and ZOLNIEREK, J. (1999), “The R&D Incentives of Industry Leaders”, International Economic Review, 40, 745-766 TAYLOR, M. S. (1993), “‘Quality Ladders’ and Ricardian Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 34, 225-243 YOUNG, A. (1998), “Growth without Scale Effects”, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41-63 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/14300 |