Adriani, Fabrizio and Sonderegger, Silvia (2009): Trust, Introspection, and Market Participation: an Evolutionary Approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_16110.pdf Download (300kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We build a model where introspection matters - i.e., people rationally form expectations about others using the lens of their own attitudes. Since trustworthy individuals are more "optimistic" about people than opportunists, they are less afraid to engage in market-based exchanges, where they may be vulnerable to opportunistic behavior. Within this context, we use an indirect evolutionary approach to endogenize preferences for trustworthiness. In some cases, the material rewards from greater market participation may outweigh the material disadvantages from foregoing lucrative expropriation opportunities. This implies that trustworthiness may be evolutionary stable in the long-term. Although stricter enforcement (that limits the scope for opportunistic behavior) does in some cases favor preferences for trustworthy behavior (crowding in) we show that the opposite (crowding out) may also occur. Our findings are consistent with recent empirical evidence.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trust, Introspection, and Market Participation: an Evolutionary Approach |
English Title: | Trust, Introspection, and Market Participation: an Evolutionary Approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Endogenous Preferences; Trust; Introspection; Institutions; Enforcement; Crowding Out |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C73 - Stochastic and Dynamic Games ; Evolutionary Games ; Repeated Games |
Item ID: | 16110 |
Depositing User: | Fabrizio Adriani |
Date Deposited: | 08 Jul 2009 02:37 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 02:56 |
References: | [1] Acemoglu, D., Chernozhukov, V., and Yildiz, M. (2009) “Fragility of Asymptotic Agreement under Bayesian Learning” Mimeo. [2] Adriani, F., and Sonderegger, S. “Why do Parents Socialize their Children to Behave Pro-Socially? An Information-Based Theory” CeFiMS Working Papers, DP96. [3] Akerlof, G. A., and Dickens, W. T. (1982) “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance” American Economic Review, 72: 307-319. [4] Aronson, E. (1979) “The Social Animal”, W.H. Freemam, San Francisco, CA. [5] Bester H., and G¨uth, W. (1998) “Is altruism evolutionarily stable?” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34: 193–209. [6] Binmore, K. (1994) “Game Theory and the Social Contract. Volume 1: Playing Fair” MIT Press, Cambridge. [7] Binmore, K. (2005) “Natural Justice” Oxford University Press, Oxford. [8] Bisin, A., and Verdier, T., (2001) “The Economics of Cultural Transmission and the Dynamics of Preferences” Journal of Economic Theory, 97: 298-319. [9] Bohnet, I., Frey, B.S., and Huck, S. (2001) “More Order with Less Law: On Contract Enforcement, Trust, and Crowding” American Political Science Review. 95: 131-144. [10] Bowles, S. (1998) “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions” Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 75- 111. [11] Bowles, S. (2004) “Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution” Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [12] Butler, J., Giuliano, P., and Guiso, L. (2009) “The Right Amount of Trust”. Mimeo. [13] Dawes, R.M. (1989)“Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 25: 1-17. [14] Dekel, E., Ely, J.C., and Yilankaya, O. (2007) “Evolution of Preferences” Review of Economic Studies. 74: 685-704. [15] De Long, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H, and Waldmann, R.J., (1990) “Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets” Journal of Political Economy, 98: 703-38. [16] Ellingsen, T., and Johanneson M. (2004) “ Promises, Threats and Fairness” Economic Journal, 114: 397–420. [17] Festinger, L. (1957) “A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance”, Row, Peterson, Evanston, IL. [18] Francois, P. and Zabojnik, J. (2005) “Trust Social Capital and the Process of Economic Development” Journal of the European Economics Association, 31: 51-94. [19] Francois, P. (2008) “Norms and Institutions”, Mimeo. [20] Glaeser, E.L., Laibson, D.I., Scheinkman, J.E., and Soutter, C.L. (2000) “Measuring Trust” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 811-846. [21] Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L.,(2008) “Trusting the Stock Market” Journal of Finance, 63: 2557-2600. [22] Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L. (2004) “The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development” American Economic Review, 94: 526-556. [23] G¨uth, W. (1995) “An Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Cooperative Behavior by Reciprocal Incentives” International Journal of Game Theory. 24: 323–44. [24] G¨uth, W. and Yaari, M. (1992) “An Evolutionary Approach to Explain Reciprocal Behavior in a Simple Strategic Game” in U. Witt. Explaining Process and Change – Approaches to Evolutionary Economics. Ann Arbor. 23–34. [25] Hauk, E., and Saez-Martı M., (2002), “On the Cultural Transmission of Corruption” Journal of Economic Theory 107: 311-335. [26] Huck, S. (1998) “Trust, treason, and trials: An example of how the evolution of preferences can be driven by legal institutions” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 14: 44-60. [27] Huck, S., and Oechssler, J. (1999) “The Indirect Evolutionary Approach to Explaining Fair Allocations.” Games and Economic Behavior 28: 13-24. [28] Kurz, M. (1994) “On the Structure and Diversity of Rational Beliefs,” Economic Theory 4: 877-900. [29] Maynard Smith, J., and Price, G., (1973) “The Logic of Animal Conflict”, Nature 246: 15-18. [30] Maynard Smith, J., (1982) “Evolution and the Theory of Games” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [31] Orbell, J., and R.M. Dawes (1991) “A ‘Cognitive Miser’ Theory of Cooperators’ Advantage” American Political Science Review. 85: 515-528. [32] Rayo, L., and Becker, G.S. (2007) “Evolutionary Efficiency and Happiness” Journal of Political Economy, 115: 302-37. [33] Robson, A.J. (1990) “Efficiency in Evolutionary Games: Darwin, Nash, and the Secret Handshake” Journal of Theoretical Biology 144: 379-396. [34] Robson, A.J. (2001) “Why Would Nature Give Individuals Utility Functions?” Journal of Political Economy 109: 900-914. [35] Ross L., Greene, D., and House, P., (1977) “The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13: 279-301. [36] Samuelson, L. (2001) “Introduction to the Evolution of Preferences” Journal of Economic Theory. 97: 225-230. [37] Samuelson, L. and J. Swinkels (2006) “Information, Evolution and Utility” Theoretical Economics. 1:119-142. [38] Samuelson, L. (2004) “Information-Based Relative Consumption Effects” Econometrica. 72: 93-118. [39] Sapienza, P., Toldra, A., and Zingales, L., 2007. “Understanding Trust” CEPR Discussion Papers, 6462. [40] Singer, T., and Fehr, E. (2005) “The Neuroeconomics of Mind Reading and Empathy”, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 95: 340-345. [41] Tabellini, G., (2008) “The Scope of Cooperation: Values and Incentives”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, forthcoming. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16110 |