The Effects of For-Profit College Training on Earnings

Chung, Anna (2008): The Effects of For-Profit College Training on Earnings.

Abstract

In this paper, I obtain the estimates of the effects of for-profit training and credentials on students' annualized earnings. I differentiate for-profit students by the program level and account for students' self-selection into for-profit sector. I formulate the evaluation as the series progressing in the assumption on the source of selection bias: a basic specification of the Mincer earnings model is followed up by the rich-covariate model of selection on observables and finally by the multinomial model of selection into for-profit postsecondary training. To identify the selection into for-profit training, I use two exclusion restrictions: state-specific community college tuition, and county-specific share of Title-IV eligible for-profit schools. I find that selection into employment is not a pressing issue with for-profit college trained workers. Also, after controlling for self-selection into for-profit sector I find that on average a receipt of a for-profit certificate is associated with an increase in individual annualized earnings. However, this finding varies by gender, so I investigate various explanations for this gender divide. I observe that the differences in earnings effects between men and women are not systematically related to occupational differences by gender. Also, there may be some merit to the claim that the lack of the significant effects of for-profit Associate degrees for males are due to the unrelated vocational training.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: for-profit; private; workforce; training; education; vocational; wages
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H44 - Publicly Provided Goods: Mixed Markets

References

Blundell, R., Dearden, L., & Sianesi, B. (2005). Evaluating the effect of education on earnings: models, methods and results from the National Child Development Survey. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, 168(Part 3), 473-512.

Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., & Gurgand, M. (2004). Selection Bias Corrections Based on the Multinomial Logit Model: Monte-Carlo Comparisons. DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure).

Card, D. (1999). Chapter 30 The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 3(Part 1), 1801-1863.

Chung, A. (2008). For-Profit Student Heterogeneity. Unpublished paper.

Chung, A. (2008). Choice of For-Profit College. Unpublished paper.

Dahl, G. B. (2002). Mobility and the Return to Education: Testing a Roy Model with Multiple Markets. Econometrica, 70, 2367-2420.

DeHoyos, R. E. (2006). Structural Modelling of Female Labour Participation and Occupation Decisions. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

Dubin, J. A., & McFadden, D. L. (1984). An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption. Econometrica, 52(2), 345-362.

Ferrer, A. M., & Riddell, W. C. (2002). The role of credentials in the Canadian labour market. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4), 879-905.

Goldberg, J., & Smith, J. (2008). The Effects of Education on Labor Market Outcomes. In E. Fiske & H. Ladd (Eds.), Handbook of Education Finance and Policy: Routledge.

Grubb, W. N. (1992). Postsecondary Vocational Education and the Sub-baccalaureate Labor Market:New Evidence on Economic Returns. Economics of Education Review, 11(3), 225-248.

Grubb, W. N. (1993). The long-run effects of proprietary schools on wages and earnings: implications for federal policy. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 15, 17-33.

Grubb, W. N. (2002a). Learning and earning in the middle, part I: national studies of pre-baccalaureate education. Economics of Education Review, 21, 299-321.

Grubb, W. N. (2002b). Learning and earning in the middle, part II: state and local studies of pre-baccalaureate education. Economics of Education Review, 21, 401-414.

Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.

Heckman, J. J., Lochner, L. J., & Todd, P. E. (2006). Earnings functions, rates of return and treatment effects: The Mincer equation and beyond. In E. A. Hanushek & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 1, pp. 307-458). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Heckman, J. J., & Robb, R. (1986). Alternative Methods for Solving the Problem of Selection Bias in Evaluating the Impact of Treatments on Outcomes. In H. Wainer (Ed.), Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Jaeger, D. A., & Page, M. E. (1996). Degrees Matter: New Evidence on Sheepskin Effects in the Returns to Education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 733-740.

Kane, T. J., & Rouse, C. E. (1995). Labor-Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year College. The American Economic Review, 85(3), 600-614.

Lee, L.-F. (1983). Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity. Econometrica, 51, 507-512.

Lyke, R. F., Gabe, T., & Aleman, S. R. (1991). Early labor market experiences of proprietary school students [microform]. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service Library of Congress.

Marcotte, D. E. (2006). The Earnings Effect of Education at Community Colleges. University of Maryland Baltimore County and IZA Bonn.

Marcotte, D. E., Bailey, T., Borkoski, C., & Kienzl, G. S. (2005). The Returns of a Community College Education: Evidence From the National Education Longitudinal Survey. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 157-175.

McFadden, D. L. (1973). Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic Press.

Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; distributed by Columbia University Press.

Wilms, W. W. (1975). Public and proprietary vocational training: a study of effectiveness. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.