Roman, Monica (2010): Regional efficiency of knowledge economy in the new EU countries: The Romanian and Bulgarian case. Forthcoming in: Romanian Journal of Regional Science , Vol. 4, No. 1 (2010)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_23083.pdf Download (199kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The economic success is more and more based on upon the effective utilization of intangible assets such as knowledge, skills and innovative potential as the key resource for competitive advantage. For transition countries, such as Romania and Bulgaria, the efficiency of research and development activities is particularly important, since technological progress is one of the core aspects of economic growth. In this article we describe the common features of the two countries, but also the existing differences in respect with knowledge based economy. There are significant regional differences within the countries and marginal regions must close the gap with more developed regions. The paper analyzes research efficiency at the regional level for NUTS2 regions from Romania and Bulgaria between 2003 and 2005, applying a DEA framework. Our main finding is that Bulgarian regions are more efficient in R&D activities compared to Romanian ones. The only Romanian efficient region is Bucuresti Ilfov, while the other two efficient regions are rather small Bulgarian regions, with fewer resources. They show a remarkably high level of research efficiency, whereas some of the larger regions (both from Romania and Bulgaria) lag behind.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Regional efficiency of knowledge economy in the new EU countries: The Romanian and Bulgarian case |
English Title: | Regional efficiency of knowledge economy in the new EU countries: The Romanian and Bulgarian case |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | regions; knowledge economy; transition countries; efficiency; DEA |
Subjects: | R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P27 - Performance and Prospects R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 23083 |
Depositing User: | Monica Roman |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jun 2010 22:23 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 02:43 |
References: | Allen, S. G., (2001), "Technology and the Wage Structure," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(2), pp. 440-483 Bojkov, V. D. (2004), Neither here, not there: Bulgaria and Romania in current European politics , Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp. 509-522 Bourdeau-Lepage, L., Desislava, K., (2008),“Knowledge Society and Transition Economies. The Bulgarian Challenge”, The Journal of the Romanian Regional Science Association, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 53-79 Caselli, F., Wilbur John Coleman II, (2001), "Cross-Country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(2), pp 328-335 Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin A.Y., Seiford, L.M., (1994), “Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications”, Kluwer Academic Publishers Charnes, A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes. E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational. Research 2: 429-444. Cherchye, L., Moesen, Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck T. (2009) – “Constructing a Knowledge Economy Composite Indicator with Imprecise Data” , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, series Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers, number ces09.15 Coelli, T., Rao, P., O’Donnell, C. J. and Battese, G. E. (1998) - An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, Kluver Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London Coelli, T.J. (1996), “A guide to DEAP Version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program”, CEPA Working Paper 96/08, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale, Australia. Cullmann, Schmidt-Ehmcke, Zloczysti (2009), “Innovation, R&D Efficiency and the Impact of the Regulatory Environment—A Two Stage Semi-Parametric DEA Approach”, DIW Discussion Paper http://www.diw.de/english/products/publications/discussion_papers/27539.html Curaj, A. (2007), “Report on the national research system in Romania”, CEPES Bucharest, Romania Dyson, R.G., R. Allen, A.S. Camanho, V.V. Podinovski, C.S. Sarrico and E.A. Shale (2001) - “Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA.” European Journal of Operational Research 132(2), 245-259. Farrel, M.J. (1957), “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the royal statistical society, Series A, CXX, Part 3, 253-290 Goschin, Z., Constantin, D.-L., Roman, M., Ileanu B. (2008) “The Current State and Dynamics Of Regional Disparities In Romania”, The Journal of the Romanian Regional Science Association, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 80-105 Guellec, P., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001), “R&D and Productivity Growth, OECD Science and Technology”, Working Papers, no. 3 Huggins R and Hiro Izushi (2007), “The Knowledge Competitiveness Of Regional Economies: Conceptualisation And Measurement”, Bank of Valletta Review, No. 35, Spring Karkazis, J. And Thanassoulis E. (1998), “Assessing the Effectiveness of Regional Development Policies in Northern Greece”, Socio-Economical Planning Science Vol 32, no 2. pp. 123-137 Kolarova, R. (1999), “Democratisation in Bulgaria: recent trends”, In: M. Kaldor and I. Vejvoda, Editors, Democratisation in Bulgaria: Recent Trends, Pinter, London pp. 150–161 Roman, M., (2003), “Resursele umane in Romania. Evaluare si eficienta”, Editura ASE, Bucuresti European Union web site, “Facing The Challenge. The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment”. Report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok, November 2004, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, ISBN 92-894-7054-2, (the Kok report). Schmidt-Ehmcke and Zloczysti, P. (2009) “Research Efficiency in Manufacturing – An Application of DEA at the Industry Level”, Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin, http://www.diw.de/english/products/publications/discussion_papers/27539.html Sharma, S., Thomas, V. J. (2008), “Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis”, Scientometrics, 76, pp.483-501 Slavova T. (2008), “A rank order and efficiency evaluation of the EU regions in a social framework”, Empirica 35, pp. 339–367 Susiluoto, I. (2003) “Effects of ICT on Regional Economic Efficiency”, Helsinki City Urban Facts Office Web Publications, No. 2003(16), Helsinki. Wang, E.C., Huang, W. (2007) “Relative efficiency of R&D activities: a cross –country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach”, Research Policy, 36(2), pp. 260–273 Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Voigt, P., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., and Jiménez-Sáez, F., (2007) “Regional Innovation Systems: How to Assess Performance”, Regional Studies, 41: 5, pp. 661 — 672 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/23083 |