Lamping, Jennifer (2008): The Value of Commitment in Auctions with Matching.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_24373.pdf Download (224kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In many auctions, a good match between the bidder and seller raises the value of the contract for both parties although information about the quality of the match may be incomplete. This paper examines the case in which the bidder is better informed about the quality of his match with the seller than the seller is. We derive the optimal mechanism for this setting and investigate whether the seller requires commitment power to implement it. It is shown that once the reserve price is set, it is optimal for the seller to do away with any matching considerations and allocate the contract on the basis of price alone. If matching is sufficiently important to the seller, the optimal mechanism may be implemented without commitment. However, if matching is not sufficiently important, the seller suffers a loss when he is unable to commit. The magnitude of this loss increases as the importance of matching decreases.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Value of Commitment in Auctions with Matching |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Asymmetries, Auctions, Auction Theory, Bidding, Matching, Mechanism Design, Signaling |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games |
Item ID: | 24373 |
Depositing User: | Jennifer Lamping |
Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2010 10:33 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 14:46 |
References: | Asker, J., Cantillon, E.: Properties of scoring auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 39, 69-85 (2008) Avery, C.: Strategic jump bidding in English auctions. Review of Economic Studies 65, 185-210 (1998) Bester, H., Strausz, R.: Imperfect commitment and the revelation principle: The multi-agent case. Economics Letters 69, 165-171 (2000) Bikhchandani, S., Huang, C.-F.: Auctions with resale markets: An exploratory model of treasury bill markets. Review of Financial Studies 2, 311-339 (1989) Branco, F.: The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 28, 63-81 (1997) Bulow, J.: Durable-goods monopolists. Journal of Political Economy 90, 314-332 (1982) Chalot, J.P.: Personal interview. Petroleos de Venezuela (1996, October 31) Che, Y.-K.: Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 24, 668-680 (1993) Coase, R.H.: Durability and monopoly. Journal of Law and Economics 15, 143-149 (1972) Das Varma, G.: Bidding for a process innovation under alternative modes of competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21, 15-37 (2003) Gale, D., Shapley, L.S.: College admissions and the stability of marriage. American Mathematical Monthly 69, 9-15 (1962) Gitelson, G., Bing, J.W., Laroche, L.: The impact of culture on mergers and acquisitions. CMA Management (2001, March) Goeree, J.: Bidding for the future: Signaling in auctions with an aftermarket. Journal of Economic Theory 108, 345-364 (2003) Gul, F., Sonnenschein, H., Wilson, R.: Foundations of dynamic monopoly and the Coase conjecture. Journal of Economic Theory 39, 155-190 (1986) Gumbel, A.: Civil War writer's one-page outline earns him record $11m book and film contract. The Independent (2002, April 8) Haile, P.A.: Auctions with private uncertainty and resale opportunities. Journal of Economic Theory 108, 72-110 (2003) Hart, O.D., Tirole, J.: Contract renegotiation and Coasian dynamics. Review of Economic Studies 55, 509-540 (1988) Jehiel, P., Moldovanu, B.: Efficient design with interdependent valuations. Econometrica 69, 1237-1259 (2001) Katzman, B., Rhodes-Kropf, M.: The consequences of information revealed in auctions. Mimeo, Columbia University, Graduate School of Business (2002) Lamping, J.: Ignorance is bliss: Matching in auctions with an uninformed seller. Mimeo, University of Colorado, Department of Economics (2008) Maskin, E., Tirole, J.: The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal, II: Common values. Econometrica 60, 1-42 (1992) McAfee, R.P., Vincent, D.: Sequentially optimal auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 18, 246-276 (1997) Milgrom, P.R., Weber, R.J.: A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50, 1089-1122 (1982) Molnar, J., Virag, G.: Revenue maximizing auctions with market interaction and signaling. Economics Letters 99, 360-363 (2008) Myerson, R.B.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 58-73 (1981) Rezende, L.: Biased procurement auctions. Economic Theory (forthcoming) Riley, J.G., Samuelson, W.F.: Optimal auctions. American Economic Review 71, 381-392 (1981) Skreta, V.: Optimal auction design under non-commitment. Mimeo, New York University, Stern School of Business (2007) Stokey, N.: Rational expectations and durable goods pricing. Bell Journal of Economics 12, 112-128 (1981) Vartiainen, H.: Auction design without commitment. Mimeo, Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation (2007) Zheng, C.Z.: Optimal auction in a multidimensional world. Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science Discussion Paper 1282 (2000) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/24373 |