Spash, Clive L. and Ryan, Anthony M. (2010): Ecological, Heterodox and Neoclassical Economics: Investigating the Differences.
Download (489kB) | Preview
How heterodox are ecological economists and how ecological are heterodox economists? How do both differ, if at all, from neoclassical economists when addressing environmental problems? In 2009 we probed such questions by conducting an international survey at economic conferences on the environment and sustainability. This paper reports on surveys conducted at conferences of the European Society for Ecological Economics, the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, and the Association of Heterodox Economists. A key aim was to gain insight into the extent to which ecological economics can be described as a distinct field of research from orthodox environmental and resource economics. Conflict within the field has meant a prevalence of neoclassical articles and thought mixed in amongst more heterodox work. The question then arises are those participating in ecological economics ideologically and methodologically similar to those schools of thought falling under the heterodox economic umbrella or the orthodox? In addressing this question problems are identified with economic understanding of environmental problems and the lack of communication across schools and disciplines. Suggestions are made as to how we might, as a community of concerned scholars and activists, move forward.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Ecological, Heterodox and Neoclassical Economics: Investigating the Differences|
|Keywords:||Ecological economics, heterodox, neoclassical, methodology, ideology|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other
|Depositing User:||Clive L. Spash|
|Date Deposited:||02. Nov 2010 12:25|
|Last Modified:||31. Dec 2015 01:54|
Bohm, P. and A. V. Kneese, Eds. (1971) The Economics of Environment. London: Macmillan.
Carson, R. (1987 ) Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V. (1952) Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Earl, P. E. (2005) Economics and psychology in the twenty-first century. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29(6): 909-926.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1975) Energy and Economic Myths. Southern Economic Journal XLI(347-381).
Hanley, N. and C. L. Spash (1993) Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.
Holling, C. S. (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 292-317.
Holt, R. P. F., S. Pressman and C. L. Spash, Eds. (2010) Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Environmental Issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Howarth, R. B. (2008) Editorial. Ecological Economics 64: 469.
Kneese, A. V. and B. T. Bower (1968) Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions. Baltimore, Maryland: Resources for the Future.
Lawson, T. (2005) The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 30(4): 483-505.
Lee, F. (2009) A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2002) The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Milfont, T. L. and J. Duckitt (2004) The structure of environmental attitudes: A first and second-order confirmatory analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24: 289-303.
Røpke, I. (2004) The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics 50(3-4): 293-314.
Røpke, I. (2005) Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics 55(2): 262-290.
Spash, C. L. (1995) The political economy of nature. Review of Political Economy 7(3): 279-293.
Spash, C. L. (1999) The development of environmental thinking in economics. Environmental Values 8(4): 413-435.
Spash, C. L., Ed. (2009) Ecological Economics: Critical Concepts in the Environment, 4 Volumes. Routledge Major Work. London: Routledge.
Spash, C. L. (2011a) Ecological Economics: A Movement in Three Camps. Ecological Economics forthcoming.
Spash, C. L. (2011b) Social ecological economics: Understanding the past to see the future. American Journal of Economics and Sociology forthcoming.
Spash, C. L. and H. Schandl (2009) Growth, the Environment and Keynes: Reflections on Two Heterodox Schools of Thought. Socio-Economics and Environment in Discussion (SEED) Working Papers. 2009-01. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
Yanarella, E. J. and R. Ihara, Eds. (1985) The Acid Rain Debate: Scientific, Economic, and Political Dimensions. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Available Versions of this Item
- Ecological, Heterodox and Neoclassical Economics: Investigating the Differences. (deposited 02. Nov 2010 12:25) [Currently Displayed]