Spash, Clive L. and Ryan, Anthony M. (2010): Ecological, heterodox and neoclassical economics: investigating the differences.
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (516kB) | Preview
How heterodox are ecological economists and how ecological are heterodox economists? How do both differ, if at all, from neoclassical economists when addressing environmental problems? In 2009 we probed such questions by conducting an international survey at economic conferences on the environment and sustainability. This paper reports on surveys conducted at conferences of the European Society for Ecological Economics, the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics, and the Association of Heterodox Economists. A key aim was to gain insight into the extent to which ecological economics can be described as a distinct field of research from orthodox environmental and resource economics. Conflict within the field has meant a prevalence of neoclassical articles and thought mixed in amongst more heterodox work. The question then arises are those participating in ecological economics ideologically and methodologically similar to those schools of thought falling under the heterodox economic umbrella or the orthodox? In addressing this question problems are identified with economic understanding of environmental problems and the lack of communication across schools and disciplines. Suggestions are made as to how we might, as a community of concerned scholars and activists, move forward.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Ecological, heterodox and neoclassical economics: investigating the differences|
|Keywords:||Ecological economics, heterodox, neoclassical, methodology, ideology|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other
|Depositing User:||Clive L. Spash|
|Date Deposited:||24. Jun 2012 02:38|
|Last Modified:||07. Sep 2015 06:22|
Altvater, E. 2007. Marxism and ecological economics: Toward a red and green political economy. Monthly Review, vol. 58, no. 8, 55-64.
Benton, T. 1989. Marxism and natural limits: An ecoligical critique and reconstruction. New Left Review, vol. 178, no. November-December, 51-86.
Bohm, P. & A.V. Kneese. 1971. The Economics of Environment. 163. London: Macmillan.
Burkett, P. 2005. Marx's vision of sustainable human development. Monthly Review, vol. 57, no. 5, 34-62.
Burkett, P. 2006. Marxism and Ecological Economics: Toward a Red and Green Political Economy. Boston, Brill.
Carson, R. 1987 . Silent Spring. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. 1952. Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies. Berkeley, University of California Press.
Cronin, B. 2010. The diffusion of heterodox economics. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 69, no. 5, 1475-1494.
Daly, H.E. 1992. Steady-State Economics: Second Edition with New Essays. London, Earthscan.
Daly, H.E. & J. Farley. 2004. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington, Island Press.
Dolfsma, W. & L. Leydesdorff. 2008. Heterodox journals networks and ranking journals as constituents of sceintific discourse: Economics heterodoxy. On The Horizon, vol. 16, no. 4, 214-225.
Douai, A. 2009. Value theory in ecological economics: The contribution of a politcal economy of wealth. Environmental Values, vol. 18, no. 3, 257-284.
Earl, P.E. 2005. Economics and psychology in the twenty-first century. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 29, no. 6, 909-926.
Ehrlich, P.R. 2008. Key issues for attention from ecological economists. Environment and Development Economics, vol. 13, no. 1, 1-20.
Galbraith, J.K. 1969 . The Affluent Society. Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1975. Energy and Economic Myths. Southern Economic Journal, vol. 41, no. 3, 347-381.
Hanley, N. & C.L. Spash. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Aldershot, England, Edward Elgar.
Herber, L. 1962. Our Synthetic Environment. New York, Knopf.
Holling, C.S. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, eds. W.C. Clark & R.E. Munn, 292-317. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Holt, R.P.F., S. Pressman & C.L. Spash. 2009. Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Envrionmental Issues. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Howarth, R.B. 2008. Editorial. Ecological Economics, vol. 64, 469.
Kapp, K.W. 1950. The Social Costs of Private Enterprise. New York, Shocken.
Kapp, K.W. 1970. Environmental disruption: General issues and methodological problems. Social Science Information, vol. 9, no. 4, 15-32.
Kapp, K.W. 1978. The Social Costs of Business Enterprise, 3rd edition. Nottingham, Spokesman.
Kneese, A.V. & B.T. Bower. 1968. Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions. Baltimore, Maryland, Resources for the Future.
Lawson, T. 2006. The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 30, no. 4, 483-505.
Lee, F. 2009. A History of Heterodox Economics: Challenging the Mainstream in the Twentieth Century. London, Routledge.
Lee, F.S., T.C. Grijalva & C. Nowell. 2010. Ranking economics departments in a contested discipline: A bibliometric approach to quality equality between theoretically distinct subdisciplines. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 69, no. 5, 1345-1375.
Martinez-Alier, J. 1990. Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment and Society. Oxford, England, Basil Blackwell.
Martinez-Alier, J. 2002. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Mearman, A. 2007. Post Keynesian economics and the environment: Waking up and smelling the coffee burning? International Journal of Green Economics, vol. 1, no. 3-4, 374-380.
Mearman, A. 2011. Who do heterodox economists think they are? American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 70, no. 2, 480-510.
Milfont, T.L. & J. Duckitt. 2004. The structure of environmental attitudes: A first and second-order confirmatory analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 24, 289-303.
Norgaard, R.B. 1989. The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, 37-57.
O'Connor, M. 1994. Is Capitalism Sustainable? Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology. 283. New York: Guilford Press.
Røpke, I. 2004. The early history of modern ecological economics. Ecological Economics, vol. 50, no. 3-4, 293-314.
Røpke, I. 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics, vol. 55, no. 2, 262-290.
Söderbaum, P. 1992. Neoclassical and institutional approaches to development and the environment. Ecological Economics, vol. 5, no. 2, 127-144.
Söderbaum, P. 2000. Ecological Economics. London, Earthscan.
Spash, C.L. 1995. The political economy of nature. Review of Political Economy, vol. 7, no. 3, 279-293.
Spash, C.L. 1999. The development of environmental thinking in economics. Environmental Values, vol. 8, no. 4, 413-435.
Spash, C.L. 2009. Ecological Economics: Critical Concepts in the Environment, 4 Volumes. In Routledge Major Work, 1600. London: Routledge.
Spash, C.L. 2011. Social ecological economics: Understanding the past to see the future. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 70, no. 2, 340-375.
Spash, C.L. & H. Schandl. 2009. Challenges for Post Keynesian Growth Theory: Utopia meets Environmental and Social Reality. In Post Keynesian and Ecological Economics: Confronting Envrionmental Issues, eds. R.P.F. Holt, C.L. Spash & S. Pressman, 47-76. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Vatn, A. 2005. Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
Veblen, T. 1991 . The Theory of the Leisure Class. Fairfield, New Jersey, Augustus M Kelley.
Veblen, T.B. 1898. Why economics is not an evolutionary science? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 12, no. July, 373-397.
Yanarella, E.J. & R. Ihara. 1985. The Acid Rain Debate: Scientific, Economic, and Political Dimensions. 342. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Available Versions of this Item
Ecological, Heterodox and Neoclassical Economics: Investigating the Differences. (deposited 02. Nov 2010 12:25)
- Ecological, heterodox and neoclassical economics: investigating the differences. (deposited 24. Jun 2012 02:38) [Currently Displayed]