Magazzino, Cosimo (2010): Wagner's law and Italian disaggregated public spending: some empirical evidences.
Download (501kB) | Preview
Wagner’s Law is the first model of public spending in the history of public finance. The aim of this article is to assess its empirical evidence in Italy for the period 1960-2008 at a disaggregated level, using a time-series approach. After a brief introduction, a survey of the economic literature on this issue is shown, before estimating the specifications of Wagner’s Law for some specific items of public spending (for interests, for final consumption, for labour dependent income, for grants on production, and for public investments). We found a cointegration relationship for three out of five items. Moreover, Granger causality tests results show evidence in favour of Wagner’s law only for spending for passive interests in the long-run, and for spending for dependent labour income in the short-run. Some notes on the policy implications of our empirical results conclude the paper.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Wagner's law and Italian disaggregated public spending: some empirical evidences|
|English Title:||Wagner's law and Italian disaggregated public spending: some empirical evidences|
|Keywords:||public spending; economic growth; Wagner’s Law; time-series; unit root; cointegration; causality; fiscal policy|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models
H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General
H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H60 - General
N - Economic History > N4 - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation > N44 - Europe: 1913-
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General
|Depositing User:||Cosimo Magazzino|
|Date Deposited:||13. Nov 2010 14:54|
|Last Modified:||30. Dec 2015 20:58|
ABU-BADER S. – ABU-QARN A.S. (2003), Government Expenditures, Military Spending and Economic Growth: Causality Evidence from Egypt, Israel and Syria, Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(6-7), 567-583.
AFXENTIOU P.C. – SERLETIS A. (1991), A Time-Series Analysis of the Relationship Between Government Expenditure and Gdp in Canada, Public Finance Review, 19(3), July, 316-333.
AKITOBY B. – CLEMENT B. – GUPTA S. – INCHAUSTE G. (2006), Public spending, voracity, and Wagner’s law in developing countries, European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 4, December, 908-924.
ANSARI M.I. – GORDON D.V. – AKUAMOAH C. (1997), Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and national income in three African countries, Applied Economics, 29, 543-550.
ASSEERY A.A. – LAW D. – PERDIKIS N. (1999), Wagner’s Law and public expenditure in Iraq: a test using disaggregated data, Applied Economics, 6, 39-44.
ARPAIA A. – TURRINI A. (2008), Government expenditure and economic growth in the EU: long-run tendencies and short-term adjustment, Economic Papers, 300, February.
BELLA M. – QUINTIERI B. (1989), Crescita in disequilibrio ed espansione del settore pubblico, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, 2, 179-200.
BENOIT E. (1978), Growth and Defense in Developing Countries, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26(2), 271-280.
BIRD R.M. (1971), Wagner’s Law: a Pooled Time Series and Cross Section Comparison, National Tax Journal, 38, 209-218.
BISWAS B. – RAM R. (1986), Military Expenditures and Economic Growth in Less Developed Countries: An Augmented Model and Further Evidence, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34(2), 361-372.
BRIOTTI M.G. (2005), Economic Reactions to Public Finance Consolidation: A Survey of the Literature, in European Central Bank Occasional Papers, 38, October.
BURNEY N.A. (2002), Wagner’s hypothesis: evidence from Kuwait using cointegration tests, Applied Economics, 34, 49-57.
CLEMENTS B. – FAIRCLOTH C. – VERHOEVEN M. (2007), Public Expenditure in Latin America: trends and key policy issues, CEPAL Review, 93, December, 37-60.
CHLETSOS M. – KOLLIAS C. (1997), Testing Wagner’s law using disaggregated data in the case of Greece: 1958-93, Applied Economics, 29, 371-377.
CHOW Y.-F. – COTSOMITIS J.A. – KWAN A.C.C. (2002), Multivariate cointegration and causality tests of Wagner’s hypothesis: evidence from the UK, Applied Economics, 34, 1671-1677.
CHRYSTAL A. – ALT J. (1979), Endogenous Government Behaviour: Wagner’s Law or Götterdämmerung?, in COOK S.T. – JACKSON P.M. (eds.), Current Issues in Fiscal Policy, Oxford: Martin Robertson, 127-137.
COTSOMITIS J.A. – HARNHIRUN S. – KWAN A.C.C. (1996), Co-integration Analysis and the Long-Run Validity of Wagner’s Hypothesis: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China, Journal of Economic Development, 21, 2, December.
DAKURAH H. – DAVIES S. – SAMPATH R. (2001), Defense Spending and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Causality Analysis, Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(6), 651-658.
DEGER S. – SEN S. (1985), Military Expenditure, Spin-off and Economic Development, Journal of Development Economics, 13(1-2), 67-83.
DEGER S. – SMITH R. (1985), Military Expenditure and Development: The Economic Linkages, IDS Bulletin, 16, 49-54.
DEMIRBAS S. (1999), Cointegration Analysis-Causality Testing and Wagner’s Law: The Case of Turkey, 1950-1990, typescript, May.
DIBA B. (1982), A Note on Public Sector Growth: a Real Perspective, Public Finance, 37, 114-119.
DICKEY D.A. – FULLER W.A. (1979), Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical association, 74, 427-431.
DOGAN E. – TANG T.C. (2006), Government Expenditure and National Income: causality Test For Five South East Asian Countries, International Business & Economics Research Journal, 5, 10, October, 49-58.
EASTERLY W. – REBELO S. (1993), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: an Empirical Investigation, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 417-458.
FAINI R. – ANNEZ P. – TAYLOR L. (1986), Defense Spending, Economic Structure and Growth: Evidence Among Countries and Over Time, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 487-498.
FERRIS J.S. – WEST E.G. (1996), Testing Theories of Real Government Size: U.S. Experience, Southern Economic Journal, 62, 3, January, 537-553.
FLORIO M. – COLAUTTI S. (2001), A logistic growth law for government expenditures: an explanatory analysis, Dipartimento di Economia Politica e Aziendale – Working Paper, Università degli Studi di Milano, 13, June.
FOSSATI A. (1981), La spesa pubblica in Italia dal 1951 al 1980, Rivista di Diritto Finanziario e Scienza delle Finanze, 3, XL, 322-375.
FOSSATI A. (1999), Economia pubblica. Elementi per un’analisi economica dell’intervento pubblico, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
GANDHI V.P. (1971), Wagner’s Law of Public Expenditure: Do Recent Cross-Section Studies Confirm It?, Public Finance, 26, 44-56.
GIARDA P.D. (1988), Una interpretazione della crescita della spesa pubblica in Italia: 1952-1987, Rivista Bancaria, XLIV, 11-12, November-December.
GRANGER C.W.J. (1969), Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods, Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
HADJIMATHEOU G. (1976), On the Empirical Evidence on Government Expenditure Development, Public Finance, 31, 144-148.
HALICIOGLU F. (2005), Testing Wagner’s Law for Turkey, 1960-2003, Public Economics.
HAMILTON J.D. (1994), Time Series Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HENREKSON M. (1993), Wagner’s Law - A Spurious Relationship?, Public Finance, 48, 2, 406-415.
HINRICHS H.H. (1965), Determinants of Government Revenue Shares among Less-Developed Countries, Economic Journal, 75, September, 546-556.
JACKSON P. (1980), The Growth of the Relative Size of the Public Sector, in CURRIE D. – PETERS W., Contemporary Economics Analysis, vol. II, London: Croom Helm, 329-354.
JOHANSEN S. (1988), Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economics Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
JOHANSEN S. – JUSELIUS K. (1990), Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.
KALAM A.M. – AZIZ N. (2009), Growth of Government Expenditure in Bangladesh: An Empirical Inquiry into the Validity of Wagner’s Law, Global Economy Journal, 9, 2, 5.
KARAGIANNI S. – PEMPETZOGLOU M. – STRIKOU S. (2002), Testing Wagner’s LawFor The European Union Economies, The Journal of Applied Business Research, 18, 4, 107-114.
KELLEY A.C. (1976), Demographic Change and the Size of the Government Sector, Southern Economic Journal, 3, 2, October, 1056-1066.
KOLLURI B.R. – PANIK M.J. – WAHAB M.S. (2000), Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries, Applied Economics, 32, 1059-1068.
KOOP G. – POIRIER D.J. (1995), An Empirical Investigation of Wagner’s Hypothesis by Using a Model Occurrence Framework, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, A, 158, 1, 123-141.
KUMAR S. – WEBBER D.J. – FARGHER S. (2009), Wagner’s Law Revisited: Cointegration and Causality tests for New Zealand, University of the West of England Discussion Papers, 0917.
KWIATKOWSKI D. – PHILLIPS P.C.B. – SCHMIDT P. – SHIN Y. (1992), Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
LAMARTINA S. – ZAGHINI A. (2008), Increasing Public Expenditures: Wagner’s Law in OECD Countries, Center for Financial Studies Working Papers, 13.
LIM D. (1983), Instability of Government Revenue and Expenditure in Less Developed Countries, World Development, 11(5), 447-450.
MAGAZZINO C. (2008), Modelli interpretativi della dinamica della spesa pubblica e “curva di Armey”: il caso italiano, 1862-2001, Notizie di Politeia, XXIV, 92, 45-60.
MAGAZZINO C. (2009a), Stima della spesa pubblica italiana secondo i modelli di Musgrave e Rostow e di O’Connor, Il Risparmio Review, LVII, 3, July-September, 59-84.
MAGAZZINO C. (2009b), Spesa pubblica disaggregata e “Legge di Wagner”, Economia, Impresa e Mercati finanziari, 3, September-Decemeber, 7-31.
MAGAZZINO C. (2010a), “Wagner’s Law” in Italy: Empirical Evidence from 1960 to 2008, Global & Local Economic Review, 2, January-June, 91-116.
MAGAZZINO C. (2010c), Wagner’s Law and Augmented Wagner’s Law in EU-27, C.R.E.I. Working Papers, 05/2010.
MOHAMMADI M. – CAK M. – CAK D., (2008), Wagner’s hypothesis: New evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach, Journal of Economic Studies, 35, 1, 94-106.
MUHLIS B. – HAKAN Ç. (2003), Causality Between Public Expenditure and Economic Growth: The Turkish Case, MPRA Paper, 8576.
MURTHY V. (1994), Wagner’s Law, Spurious in Mexico or Misspecification: a reply, Public Finance, 49, 2, 295-303.
MUSGRAVE R.A. (1969), Fiscal Systems, New Haven: Yale University Press.
MUSGRAVE R. A. – PEACOCK A.T. (1967), Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London: Macmillan.
NARAYAN P.K. – NIELSEN I. – SMYTH R. (2008), Panel Data, cointegration, causality and Wagner’s law: Empirical evidence from Chinese provinces, China Economic Review, 19, 2, June, 297-307.
NITTI F.S. (1972), La scienza delle finanze, in FORTE F. (a cura di), Edizione Nazionale delle Opere di Nitti, Bari: Laterza.
OXLEY L. (1994), Cointegration, causality and Wagner’s Law: A Test for Britain 1870-1913, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 41, 286-298.
PHILLIPS P.C.B. – PERRON P. (1988), Testing for a unit root in a time series regression, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
RAM R. (1986a), Comparing Evidence on Wagner’s Hypothesis from Conventional and ‘Real’ Data, Economic Letters, 20, 259-262.
RAM R. (1986b), Causality between Income and Government Expenditure: A Broad International Perspective, Public Finance, 41, 393-413.
RAM R. (1987), Wagner’s Hypothesis in Time-Series and Cross-Section Perspectives: Evidence from “Real” Data for 115 Countries, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 2, May, 194-204.
ROSTOW W.W. (1971), Politics and the Stages of Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ROTSCHILD K. (1977), Military Expenditure, Export and Growth, Kyklos, 26, 804-813.
SHELTON C.A. (2007), The Size and Composition of Government Expenditure, Wesleyan Economic Working Papers, 2, January.
SIDERIS D. (2007), Wagner’s Law in 19th Century Greece: A Cointegration and Causality Analysis, Bank of Greece Working Papers, 64, December.
SINGH B. – SAHNI B.S. (1984), Causality Between Public Expenditure and National Income, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, 4, November, 630-644.
STEIN E. – TALVI E. – GRISANTI A. (1998), Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: the Latin American experience, Inter-American Development Bank, Office of the Chief Economist Working Paper, 367, February.
THORNTON J. (1999), Cointegration, Causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th Century Europe, Applied Economic Letters, 6, 7, July, 413-416.
WAGNER A.H. (1912), Les fondements de l’economie politique, Paris: Girard & Brière, vol. III, 376-401.
WAGNER A.H. (1883), Finanzwissenschaft, Leipzig, in MUSGRAVE R.A. – PEACOCK A.T., Classics in the Theory of…, cit.
YUK W. (2005), Government Size and Economic Growth: Time-Series Evidence for the United Kingdom, 1830-1993, Econometrics Working Paper, January.
ZIRAMBA E. (2009), Wagner’s Law: An Econometric Test for south Africa, 1960-2006, South Africa Journal of Economics, 76, 4, 596-606.