A Statistical Test of City Growth: Location, Increasing Returns and Random Growth

González-Val, Rafael and Olmo, Jose (2010): A Statistical Test of City Growth: Location, Increasing Returns and Random Growth.

Abstract

This article analyzes the main existing theories on income and population city growth: the existence of increasing returns to scale, the importance of locational fundamentals, and random growth. To do this we develop a nonlinearity test that is implemented to a dataset on urban, climatological and macroeconomic variables on 1,175 U.S. cities. The conclusions of our analysis are that there are increasing returns to scale on city income growth; nevertheless, the most important variables to explain income growth are locational fundamentals. Both sets of variables need to be jointly considered to avoid inconsistent model parameter estimates. We also observe increasing returns to scale on population growth; larger cities grow at a faster pace than smaller cities. These cities are not, however, within the group of wealthiest cities implying the existence of a threshold on population beyond which per-capita income growth stagnates or even deteriorates.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: threshold nonlinearity test; locational fundamentals; multiple equilibria; random growth
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General > R00 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

References

Andrews, D. W. K., and W. Ploberger (1994). Optimal Tests When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present Only under the Alternative. Econometrica, 62, 1383-1414.

Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: What the Long-Run Data Show. American Economic Review, 76, 1072-1085.

Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i-Martin (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2): 223-251.

Beeson, P.E., D. N. DeJong, and W. Troesken (2001). Population Growth in US Counties, 1840-1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31: 669-699.

Black, D., and V. Henderson (1998). Urban evolution in the USA. Brown University Working Paper No. 98-21.

Bloom, D., D. Canning, and J. Sevilla (2003). Geography and Poverty traps. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 355-378.

Bosker, E. M., S. Brakman, H. Garretsen, and M. Schramm (2007). Looking for multiple equilibria when geography matters: German city growth and the WWII shock. Journal of Urban Economics, 61: 152-169.

Champernowne, D., (1953). A model of income distribution. Economic Journal, LXIII: 318-351.

Chan, K. S. (1993). Consistency and Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of a Threshold Autoregressive Model. Annals of Statistics, 21, 520-533.

Combes, P.-P., G. Duranton, and L. Gobillon (2008). Spatial Wage Disparities: Sorting Matters. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2): 723-742.

Combes, P.-P., G. Duranton, L. Gobillon, D. Puga, and S. Roux (2009). The Productivity Advantages of Large Cities: Distinguishing Agglomeration from Firm Selection. Discussion Paper 7191, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Córdoba, J. C. (2008). A generalized Gibrat's law. International Economic Review, Vol. 49(4): 1463-1468.

Davies, R. (1977). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika, 64, 247-254.

Davies, R. (1987). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika, 74, 33-43.

Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (2002). Bones, Bombs, and Break Points: The Geography of Economic Activity. The American Economic Review, Vol. 92(5): 1269-1289.

Davis, D. R., and D. E. Weinstein (2008). A search for multiple equilibria in urban industrial structure. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 48(1): 29-65.

De Long, J. B. (1988). Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare: Comment. American Economic Review, 78, 1138-1154.

Duranton, G., and D. Puga (2004). Micro-Foundations of Urban Agglomeration Economies. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Vol. 4, J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland, Chapter 48, pp. 2064-2117.

Durlauf, S., and P. Johnson (1995). Multiple Regimes and Cross-country Growth Behavior. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 365-384.

Ellison, G., and E. L. Glaeser (1999). The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic, Review Papers and Proceedings, 89(2), 311-316.

Evans, P. (1997). How Fast Do Economies Converge? Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2): 219-225.

Evans, P., and G. Karras (1996a). Do Economies Converge? Evidence from a Panel of U.S. States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3): 384-388.

Evans, P., and G. Karras (1996b). Convergence Revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37: 249-265.

Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf's law for cities: An explanation. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739-767.

Glaeser, E. L. (2000). The New Economics of Urban and Regional Growth, in: G. L. Clark, M. P. Feldman, and M. Gertler, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83-98.

Glaeser, E. L., and A. Saiz (2003). The Rise of the Skilled City. Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper number 2025.

Glaeser, E. L., J. A. Scheinkman, and A. Shleifer (1995). Economic growth in a cross-section of cities. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36: 117-143.

Glaeser, E. L. and J. Shapiro (2003). Urban Growth in the 1990s: Is city living back? Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 43(1): 139-165.

Hansen, B. E. (1996). Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica, 64, 413-430.

Hansen, B. E. (1997). Inference in TAR models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2, 1-14.

Higgins, M. J., D. Levy, and A. T. Young (2006). Growth and Convergence Across the U.S.: Evidence from County-Level Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4): 671-681.

Marshall, A., (1920). Principles of Economics, London: MacMillan.

Melo, P. C., D. J. Graham, and R. B. Noland (2009). A Meta-analysis of Estimates of Urban Agglomeration Economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39: 332-342.

Mitchener, K. J., and I. W. McLean (2003). The Productivity of US States since 1880. Journal of Economic Growth, 8: 73-114.

Quah, D. (1993). Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37, 426-434.

Quah, D. (1996). Convergence empirics across economies with (some) capital mobility. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 95-124.

Quah, D. (1997). Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27-59.

Roback, J. (1982). Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life. Journal of Political Economy, 90(6): 1257-1278.

Rosenthal, S. S., and W. C. Strange (2004). Evidence on the Nature and Sources of Agglomeration Economies. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, Vol. 4, J. V. Henderson and J. F. Thisse, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, North-Holland, Chapter 49, pp. 2119-2171.

Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence. European Economic Review, 40: 1325-1352.

Simon, H. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42, 425-440.

Simon, C. J., and C. Nardinelli (2002). Human capital and the Rise of American Cities, 1900--1990. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32: 59-96.

Zheng, S., Y. Fu, and H. Liu (2009). Demand for urban quality of living in China: Evolution in compensating land-rent and wage-rate differentials. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38 (3): 194-213.

Zheng, S., M. E. Kahn, and H. Liu (2010). Towards a system of open cities in China: Home prices, FDI flows and air quality in 35 major cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40: 1-10.