Mierzejewski, Fernando (2006): Liquidity preference as rational behaviour under uncertainty.
Download (276kB) | Preview
An important concern of macroeconomic analysis is how interest rates affect the cash balance demanded at a certain level of nominal income. In fact, the interest-rate- elasticity of the liquidity demand determines the effectiveness of monetary policy, which is useless under absolute liquidity preference, i.e. when the money demand is perfectly elastic. An actuarial approach is developed in this paper for dealing with random income. Assuming investors face liquidity constraints, a level of surplus exists which maximises expected value. Moreover, the optimal liquidity demand is expressed as a Value at Risk and the comonotonic dependence structure determines the amount of money demanded by the economy. As a consequence, the interest-rate-elasticity depends on the kind of risks and expectations. The more unstable the economy, the greater the interest-rate-elasticity of the money demand. Moreover, part of the adjustment to reestablish the short-run monetary equilibrium may be performed through volatility shocks.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Institution:||Katholieke Universiteit Leuven|
|Original Title:||Liquidity preference as rational behaviour under uncertainty|
|Keywords:||Money demand; Monetary policy; Economic capital; Distorted risk principle; Value-at-Risk|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E40 - General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E41 - Demand for Money
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E58 - Central Banks and Their Policies
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian
|Depositing User:||Fernando Mierzejewski|
|Date Deposited:||18. Apr 2007|
|Last Modified:||14. Mar 2015 11:32|
 Atta-Mensah, J., 2004. Money Demand and Economic Uncertainty. Bank of Canada Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 2004-25.  Ball, L., 2001. Another look at long-run money demand. Journal of Monetary Economics 47, 31-44.  Ball, L., 2002. Short-run Money Demand. Working Paper. Available in http://ideas.repec.org/p/jhu/papers/481.html  Baum, C.F., Caglayan, M., Ozkan, N. and Talavera, O., 2005. The Impact of Macroeconomic Uncertainty on Non-Financial Firms Demand for Liquidity. Working Paper. Available in http://ideas.repec.org/p/boc/bocoec/552.html  Calza, A. and Sousa, J., 2003. Why has Broad Money Demand been more stable in the Euro Area than in other Economies? A literature review. European Central Bank Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 261.  Carpenter, S.B. and Lange, J., 2002. Money Demand and Equity Markets. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and Cornerstone Research. Available in http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2003/200303/200303abs.html  Choi, W.G. and Oh, S., 2003. A Money Demand Function with Output Uncertainty, Monetary Uncertainty, and Financial Innovations. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 35, 685-709.  Churchill, R.V., 1958. Operational Mathematics. McGraw-Hill INC.  Collins, S. and Edwards, C.L., 1994. An Alternative Monetary Aggregate: M2 Plus Household Holdings of Bond and Equity Mutual Funds. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.  De Finetti, B., 1975. Theory of probability: a critical introductory treatment. Willey Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. London.  Dhaene, J., Denuit, M., Goovaerts, M., Kaas, R. and Vyncke, D., 2002. The Concept of Comonotonicity in Actuarial Science and Finance: Theory. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 31, 3-33.  Dhaene, J., Goovaerts, M. and Kaas, R., 2003. Economic Capital Allocation Derived from Risk Measures. North American Actuarial Journal 7, 44-59.  Dreger, C. and Wolters, J., 2006. Investigating the M3 Money Demand in the Euro Area — New Evidence Based on Standard Models. Discussion Papers of the German Institute for Economic Research. Working Paper No. 561.  Duca, J.V., 2000. Financial Technology Shocks and the Case of Missing M2. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 32, 820-839.  Friedman, M., 1970. A Theoretical Framework for Monetary Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy 78, 193-238.  Goovaerts M.J., Van den Borre E. and Laeven R., 2005. Managing economic and virtual economic capital within financial conglomerates. North American Actuarial Journal 9, 77-89.  Greiber, C. and Lemke, W., 2005. Money Demand and Macroeconomic Uncertainty. Discussion Paper, Series 1: Economic Studies, No. 26. Available in http://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/bubdp1/4220.html  Howells, P. and Bain, K., 2005. The Economics of Money, Bankig and Finance. Prentice Hall.  Keynes, J.M., 1935. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York.  Lucas, R., 2000. Inflation and Welfare. Econometrica 68, 247-274.  Merton, R.C., 1997. A model of contract guarantees for credit-sensitive, opaque financial intermediaries. European Finance Review 1, 1-13.  Mierzejewski, F., 2006. Economic Capital Allocation under Liquidity Constraints. Proceedings of the 4th Actuarial and Financial Mathematic Day.  Modigliani, F., 1977. The Monetarist Controversy or, Should We Forsake Stabilization Policies?. The American Economic Review 67, 1-19.  Modigliani, F. and Miller, M.H., 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review 48, 261-297.  Sharpe, W. F., 1966. Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Business 39, 119-138.  Teles, P. and Zhou, R., 2005. A Stable Money Demand: Looking for the Right Monetary Aggregate. Economic Perspectives, issue Q I, 50-63.  Tobin, J., 1958. Liquidity Preference as Behavior Toward Risk. The Review of Economic Studies 25, 65-86.  Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press.  Wang, S., 1995. Insurance pricing and increased limits ratemaking by proportional hazards transforms. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 17, 43-54.  Wang, S. and Young, V., 1998. Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus Yaaris dual theory of risk. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 22, 145-161.  Wang, S., Young, V. and Panjer, H., 1997. Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 21, 173-183.