Wang, Vey and Lai, Chung-Hui (2010): Franchise Fee, Tax/Subsidy Policies and Economic Growth.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_27745.pdf Download (177kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we take a new look at the effects of the subsidy policy and the government’s R&D activities in an R&D-based growth model. The government not only subsidizes the R&D cost of the firms but also engages in R&D activities and, in addition, levies a specific tax on the firms producing the final and the intermediate goods, respectively, in order to finance the expenditure. We find that in the economy there exist two balanced equilibrium growth paths. In an economy with a high growth path, the government’s subsidy policy and its R&D activities will crowd out the private R&D activities, and hence the fiscal policies are of no help to the economic growth. In other words, the intermediate goods firms play an important role in driving the economic growth. By contrast, in an economy with a low growth path, the government that directly engages in R&D activities plays an important role in economic growth. The fiscal policies of the government have a positive effect on the economic growth.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Franchise Fee, Tax/Subsidy Policies and Economic Growth |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Government’s R&D activities, Specific tax, Subsidy policy, Endogenous growth, R&D |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General L - Industrial Organization > L0 - General > L00 - General |
Item ID: | 27745 |
Depositing User: | Dr. |
Date Deposited: | 30 Dec 2010 20:52 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 11:08 |
References: | Aghion, P., and P., Howitt (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica 60, 323-351. Anderson, S. P., A. de Palma, and B. Kreider (2001) Tax incidence in differentiated product oligopoly, Journal of Public Economics 81, 173-192. Anderson, S. P., A. de Palma, and B. Kreider (2001) The efficiency of indirect taxed under imperfect competition, Journal of Public Economics, 81, 231-251. Atkinson, A. B., and J. E. Stiglitz (1987) Lectures on Public Economics, New York: McGraw-Hill. Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i-Martin (2004) Economic Growth, second ed, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Besley, T. J. (1989) Commodity taxation and imperfect competition: a note on the effects of entry, Journal of Public Economics 40, 359-367. Cohen, W. M., and R. C. Levin (1989) ‘Empirical studies of innovation and market structure’ in Handbook of Industrial Organization, North-Holland: Oxford, 1059-1107. Davidson, C., and P. Segerstrom (1998) R&D subsidies and economic growth, RAND Journal of Economics 29, 548-577. Delipalla, S., and M. Keen (1992) The comparison between ad valorem and specific taxation under imperfect competition, Journal of Public Economics 49, 351-367. Dixit, A. K., and J. E. Stiglitz (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review 67, 297-308. Doi, J., and K. Futagami (2004) Commodity taxation and the effects of entry: a case of variety preferences, Journal of Economics 83, 267-279. Futagami, K., and J. Doi (2004) Commodity taxation and economic growth, Japanese Economic Review 55, 46-55. Griliches, Z. (1992) The search for R&D spillovers, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94, S29-S47. Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press: Cambridge. Hamilton, S. F. (1999) Tax incidence under oligopoly: a comparison of policy approaches, Journal of Public Economics 71, 233-245. Haruyama, T., and J. I. Itaya (2006) Do distortionary taxes always harm growth, Journal of Economics 87, 99-126. Jones, C. I. (1995) R&D-based model of economic growth, Journal of Political Economy 103, 759-784. Jones, C. I., and J. C. Williams (1998) Measuring the social return to R&D, Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 1119-1135. Jones, C. I., and J. C. Williams (2000) Too much of a good thing? The economics of investment in R&D, Journal of Economic Growth 5, 65-85. Keen, M. (1998) The balance between specific and ad valorem taxation, Fiscal Studies 19, 1-37. Kitahara, M., and T. Matsumura (2006) Tax effects in a model of product differentiation: a note, Journal of Economics 89, 75-82. Lin, H. C., and B. Russo (1999) A taxation policy toward capital, technology and long-run gowth, Journal of Macroeconomics 21, 463-491. Myles, G. D. (1996) Imperfect competition and the optimal combination of ad valorem and specific taxation, International Tax and Public Finance 3, 29-44. Nadiri, M. I. (1993) Innovations and Technological Spillovers, NBER Working Paper 4423. Peretto, P. F. (2007) Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy, Journal of Economic Theory 137, 353-382. Pirttilä, J. (2002) Specific versus ad valorem taxation and externalities, Journal of Economics 76, 177-187. Romer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102. Schröder, P. J. H. (2004) The comparison between ad valorem and unit taxes under monopolistic competition, Journal of Economics 83, 281-292. Segerstrom, P. (2000) The long-run growth effects of R&D subsidies, Journal of Economic Growth 5, 277-305. Segerstrom, P., T. Anant, and E. Dinopoulos (1990) A Schumpeterian model of the product lift cycle, American Economic Review 80, 1077-1092. Şener, F. (2008) R&D policies, endogenous growth and scale effects, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 32, 3895-3916. Spence, M. (1976) Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition, Review of Economic Studies 43, 217-235. Stern, N. H. (1987) The effects of taxation, price control and government contracts in oligopoly and monopolistic competition, Journal of Public Economics 32, 133-158. Suits, D. B., and R. A. Musgrave (1953) Ad valorem and unit taxes compared, Quarterly Journal of Economics 67, 598-604. Wang, P., and Y. Wen (2008) Imperfect competition and indeterminacy of aggregate output, Journal of Economic Theory 143, 519-540. Wang, V., C. H. Lai, L. S. Lee, and S. W. Hu (2010) Franchise fee, contract bargaining and economic growth, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, forthcoming. Zeng, J., and J. Zhang (2007) Subsidies in an R&D growth model with elastic labor, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 31, 861-886. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/27745 |