The role of mid-range universities in knowledge transfer: the case of non-metropolitan regions in Central and Eastern Europe (examples from Hungary and the Czech Republic)

Gál, Zoltán and Ptáček, Pavel (2010): The role of mid-range universities in knowledge transfer: the case of non-metropolitan regions in Central and Eastern Europe (examples from Hungary and the Czech Republic). Forthcoming in: European Planning Studies

Abstract

The paper focuses on the specific role of mid-range universities in knowledge transfer and explores the knowledge flows from these mid-range universities facing a number of extra constraints in transitional Central Eastern European (CEE) regions. Mid-range universities, very often located outside of the metropolitan regions, represent the keystones of regional innovation systems for the less developed regions where the “density of contacts” is much lower and possible spillovers emerge more sparsely. The first part of the paper focuses on the types of possible linkages between mid-range universities and industry, and limitations of these relations bringing examples from Western Europe where the position of universities in the collaboration with business sector and their role in the innovation system is quite different form their CEE counterparts. It is mainly due to the different development path of innovation systems and development trajectories in post-communist countries described in the paper. Based on case studies bringing examples mainly from the non-metropolitan regions of Hungary and the Czech Republic, where the number of constraints, such as the lack of critical mass in their techno-economic systems, the traditionally weaker role of university based experimental researches, the mismatch between the economic and knowledge sectors, the weak regional innovation systems and less intense university–industry links are the major impediments of knowledge transfer. The paper argues that ambitious university-based developmental models have to be revised in CEE regions and the future role of universities has to be reconsidered as potential engines of local economic development from a more realistic perspective. The paper also argues, that the regional techno-economic system needs to achieve a certain degree of maturity in order to be able to determine the foci of a research and innovation-oriented regional development within the reindustrializing CEE regions and makes policy recommendation for the mid-range universities to take on new role, which means a stronger regional engagement in also medium-tech innovations and in social and organizational innovation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: mid-range universities; knowledge transfer; non-metropolitan regions; Central & Eastern Europe; regional engagement
• Subjects: P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P36 - Consumer Economics ; Health ; Education and Training ; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

References

Acworth, E. B. (2008) University-industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute, Research Policy, 37, pp. 1241-1254.

Asheim, B. & Boschma, R., Cooke, P. (2009): Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies (in print).

Atkinson, R.C. & Blanpied, W.A. (2008) Research universities: core of the US science and technology system, Technology in Society, 30, 1, pp. 30–48.

Bajmócy, Z. & Lukovics, M. (2009) Subregional Economic and Innovation Contribution of Hungarian Universities, in Z. Bajmócy, I. Lengyel (Eds) Regional Competitiveness, Innovation and Environment, pp. 142-161, JATE Press: Szeged.

BARNEY, J., (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99–120.

Bonaccorsi, A. & Daraio, C. (2009) Characterizing the European university system: a preliminary classification using census microdata, Science and Public Policy, 36, 10, pp. 763-775.

Boucher G., Conway C. & Van Der Meer E. (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development, Regional Studies, 37, pp. 887–897.

Digregorio, D. & Shane, S. (2003) Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?, Research Policy, 32, 2, pp. 209–227.

Dory, T. (2008) RTD policy approaches in different types of European regions, JRC and ERAWATCH Report. http://cordis.europa.eu/erawatch/index.cfm?fuseaction=intService.display&topicID=588&countryCode=AT

Erdős, K. & Varga, A. (2009) The Academic Entrepreneur: Myth or Reality for Increased Regional Growth in Europe? Paper presented at the DRUID-DIME Academy Winter 2010 PhD Conference on Academic Entrepreneurship: The Role Of Institutions, Comwell Rebild Bakker, Aalborg, Denmark, January 21 - 23, 2010

Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1999) The Future Location of Research and Technology Transfer, Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, pp. 111-123.

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C. & Terra, B. (2000) The Future of the University, the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm, Research Policy, 2, pp. 313-330.

Etzkowitz, H. (2003) Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial university, Research Policy, 32, pp. 109–121.

Franzoni, C. & Lissoni, F. (2009) Academic entrepreneurs: critical issues and lessons for Europe. in Varga, A. (Ed) Universities, Knowledge Transfer and Regional Development: Geography, Entrepreneurship and Policy, pp. 163–190. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA.

Fumi, K. (2004): Universities and Regional Advantage: Higher Education and Innovation Policies in English Regions. European Planning Studies. Vol. 12.No.6. pp. 835-852.

Gál, Z. (2002) Preconditions for Regional Innovation Network Building in the Hungarian Region of South Transdanubia, in A. Varga, L. Szerb (Eds) Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Regions and Economic Development: International Experiences and Hungarian Challenges, pp.265-295, University of Pécs, Pécs.

Gál, Z. (2005) The New Tool for Economic Growth: Role of Innovation in the Transformation and Regional Development of Hungary, Geographia Polonica, 78, 2, pp. 31-52

Gál, Z. (2008) Knowledge base of the region – role of the universities in regional innovation (the case of South Transdanubia), Revija za Geografijo, 5, 1–3, pp. 67–79.

Gál, Z. & Csonka, L. (2007) Specific analysis on the regional dimension of investment in research – case study report and database on the South Transdanubian region (Hungary). Brussels: ERAWATCH.

Goddard, J. (1999) Universities and regional development: An overview, in Klich, Z. (ed) Universities and regional engagement, pp. 33-46. Lismore: Southern Cross University Press.

Goddard, J. & Chatterton, P. (1999) Regional development agencies and the knowledge economy: Harnessing the potential of universities, Environment and Planning C: Govemment and Policy, 17, pp. 685-699.

Goldstein, H.A., Renault, C.S. (2004) Contributions of universities to regional economic development: a quasi-experimental approach, Regional Studies, 38, 7, pp.733-46.

Gunasekara, C. (2004) Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, pp. 101–113.

Gunasekara, C. (2004) The Third Role of Australian Universities in Human Capital Formation, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26, 3.

Hagen, R. (2002) Globalization, University Transformation and Economic Regeneration: A UK Case Study of Public/Private Sector Partnership, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15, 3, pp. 205–219.

Havas, A. (2009) Erawatch Country Reports 2009: Hungary. Analysis of Policy Mixes to Foster R&D Investment and to Contribute to the ERA. ERAWATCH Network.

Havrylyshyn, O. (2006) Divergent paths in post-communist transformation: capitalism for all or capitalism for the few? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Henderson, D. & THOMAS, M. (1999), “Learning through strategy making: the RTP in Wales” in Morgan, K. & Nauwelaers, C. (Eds.), Regional Innovation Strategies: The Challenge for Less Favoured Regions, Jessica Kingsley: London.

Holland, B. A. (1999) Erom murky to meaningful: The role of mission in institutional change, in R. G. BRINGLE, R. GAMES AND E. A. MALLOY (Eds) Colleges and universities as citizens, pp. 48-73. Boston: AUyn and Bacon.

Jabłecka, J. & Lepori, B. (2009) Between historical heritage and policy learning: the reform of public research funding systems in Poland, 1989–2007, Science and Public Policy, 36, 9, pp. 697–708

Jaffe, A., Tratjenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidence by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, pp. 577–598.

Koschatzky, K. (2002). Networking between industry and public research - Which role does the region play? Empirical evidence from Slovenia, in A. Varga, L. Szerb (Eds) Innovation, Entrepreneurship, Regions and Economic Development: International Experiences and Hungarian Challenges, University of Pécs, Pécs.

Lambooy, J. G. (2004) The Transmission of Knowledge, Emerging Networks, and the Role of Universities: An Evolutionary Approach, European Planning Studies, 12, 5 pp. 643-657

Lepori, B., Masso, J., Jabłecka, J., Sima, K. & Ukrainski, K. (2009) Comparing the organization of public research funding in central and eastern European countries, Science and Public Policy, 36, 9, pp. 667–681

Leydesdorff, L. & Etzkowitz, H . (2001) The transformation of university-industry-govemment relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology

Lux, G. (2010) From Industrial Periphery to Cultural Capital? Restructuring and Institutionbuilding in Pécs. In.: Suchacek, J. and Petersen, J. eds.) Developments in Minor Cities: Institutions Matter. Ostrava. Technical University Press. Pp. 103-119.

Mickiewicz, T. (2005) Economic Transition in Central Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mosoni-Fried, J. (2004) Hungary: from transformation to European integration, in W. MESKE (ed) From System Transformation to European Integration. S&T in CEE at the Beginning of the 21st century, pp. 235–258. Lit Verlag: Munster.

Nelson, R. & Winter, S. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA. Nonaka, I. (2007): The knowledge creating company, Harvard Business Review, 31, 7-8, pp. 162–171.

Polanyi, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension. Anchor Books, New York.

Polt, W., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., Rammer, C., Valentinelli, N. & Schartinger, D. (2001) Benchmarking industry-science relations - the role of framework conditions. European Commission/Federal Ministry of Labour, Austria, Vienna/Mannheim.

Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J. & Siegel, D. (2002) Universities and fundamental research: reflections on the growth of university–industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18, 1, pp. 10–21.

Ptáček, P. (2009) The Role of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Establishing of Knowledge Economy in the Czech Republic: The Case of Knowledge Intensive Business Services, in Ziolo, Z. & Rachwal, T. (Eds) Problems in the Formation of Industrial Spatial Structures and their Surrounding. Prace Komisji Geografii Przemyslu Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego, 14, pp. 22-30, Warszawa-Krakow.

Radosevic, S. & Lepori, B. (2009) Public research funding systems in central and eastern Europe: between excellence and relevance: introduction to special section, Science and Public Policy, 36, 9, pp. 659–666.

Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. & Link, A. (2003a) Improving the effectiveness of commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, pp. 111–133.

Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D. & Link, A. (2003b) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study, Research Policy, 32, 1, pp. 27–48.

Simeonova, K. (2006) Research and innovation in Bulgaria. Science and Public Policy, 33, 5, pp. 353–366.

Srinivas, S. & Viljamaa, K. (2008) Emergence of Economic Institutions: Analysing the Third Role of Universities in Turku, Finland, Regional Studies, 42, 3, pp. 323–341.

Varga, A. (2000) Local academic knowledge spillovers and the concentration of economic activity, Journal of Regional Science, 40, pp. 289-309.

Varga, A. (2003) Agglomeration and the Role of Universities in Regional Economic Development, in Lengyel, I. (ed) Innovation and Entrepreneurship. University of Szeged.

Yegorov, I. (2009) Post-Soviet science: Difficulties in the transformation of the R&D systems in Russia and Ukraine, Research Policy, 38, pp. 600–609.

Yusuf, S. (2008) Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses, Research Policy, 37, pp. 1167-1174.

Zucker, L., Darby, M. & Armstrong, J.S. (2002) Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology, Management Science, 48, 1, pp. 138–153.