Cozzi, Guido and Galli, Silvia (2011): Privatization of Knowledge: Did the U.S. Get It Right? (New Version).
Download (327kB) | Preview
To foster innovation and growth should basic research be publicly or privately funded? This paper studies the impact of the gradual shift in the U.S. patent system towards the patentability and commercialization of the basic R&D undertaken by universities. We see this movement as making universities becoming responsive to "market" forces. Prior to 1980, universities undertook research using an exogenous stock of researchers that were motivated by "curiosity." After 1980, universities patent their research and behave as private firms. This move, in a context of two-stage inventions (basic and applied research) has an a priori ambiguous effect on innovation and welfare. We build a Schumpeterian model and match it to the data to assess this important turning point.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Privatization of Knowledge: Did the U.S. Get It Right? (New Version).|
|Keywords:||R&D and Growth; Sequential Innovation; Basic Research; Patent Laws.|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
|Depositing User:||Guido Cozzi|
|Date Deposited:||23. Mar 2011 19:35|
|Last Modified:||19. May 2015 01:29|
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992), "A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction", Econometrica 60 (2), p. 323-351.
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1996), "Research and Development in the Growth Process", Journal of Economic Growth, vol.1, p. 13-25.
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998), "Endogenous Growth Theory", MIT Press.
Aoki, R. and Nagaoka, S. (2007), "Economic Analysis of Patent Law Exemption for Research on a Patented Innovation", Institute of Innovation Research, Hitotsubashi University, working paper.
Berman, E., J. Bound, and Z. Griliches, (1994), "Changes in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from theAnnual Survey of Manufacturers", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 2, pp. 367-397.
Bramoulle', Y. and G. and Saint-Paul's (2010), "Research Cycles", Journal of Economic Theory, 145, pp.1890--1920.
Denicolò, V. (2000), "Two-Stage Patent Races and Patent Policy ", RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 31, 3, pp. 488-501.
Denicolò, V. (2007), "Do patents over-compensate innovators? ", Economic Policy, Vol. 22 Issue 52 Page 679-729.
Dinopoulos, E. and Thompson, P.S., (1998), "Schumpeterian Growth Without Scale Effects", with Peter Thompson, Journal of Economic Growth, 3, pp. 313-335.
Dinopoulos, E. and Thompson, P. S., (1999), "Scale Effects in Neo-Schumpeterian Models of Economic Growth", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 9(2), pp. 157-186.
Gersbach, H., G. Sorger, and C. Amon (2009), "Hierarchical Growth: Basic and Applied Research ", Center of Economic Research at ETH Zurich, Working paper No. 09/118.
Green, J. and Scotchmer, S. (1995)."On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovations", The Rand Journal of Economics 26, pp. 20-33.
Griliches, Z. (1990), "Patent Statistics and as Economic Indicators: A Survey", Journal of Economic Literature, 18(4), pp. 1661-1707.
Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1991a), "Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth", Review of Economic Studies 58, pp. 43-61.
Grossman, G.M. and Helpman, E. (1991b), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Grossman, G.M. and Shapiro, C. (1986), "Optimal Dynamic R&D Programs", RAND Journal of Economics 17, 4, pp. 581-593.
Grossman, G.M. and Shapiro, C. (1987), "Dynamic R&D Competition", The Economic Journal 97, pp. 372-387.
Hansen, L. (1982), "Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators", Econometrica, 50(3), pp. 1029-1054.
Howitt, P. (1999), "Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing", Journal of Political Economy, vol.107, n. 4, pp.715-30.
Jensen, R. and Thursby, M. (2001), "Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions", American Economic Review, 91(1), pp. 240-59.
Jones, C., (1995) "R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth", Journal of Political Economy, 103: 759-784.
Jones, C. and J. Williams (1998), "Measuring the Social Return to R&D", Quarterly Journal of Economics, November 1998, Vol. 113, pp. 1119-1135.
Jones, C. and J. Williams (2000), "Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D", Journal of Economic Growth, March 2000, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 65-85.
Jones, C., (2005)"Growth in a World of Ideas", in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth (Elsevier, 2005) Volume 1B, pp. 1063-1111.
Krusell, P., L. Ohanian, J.V. Rios-Rull and G. Violante (2000): "Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality", Econometrica, 68:5, 1029-1054.
Leiva-Beltran, Fernando (2007), "Research vs. Development", University of Iowa working paper.
Madsen, J. B., (2008), "Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: testing the knowledge production function using international data", Journal of Economic Growth, 3.1, pp. 1-26.
Martins, J. Scarpetta, S. and D. Pilat, (1996),. "Markup Pricing, Market Structure and the Business Cycle", OECD Economic Studies 27, 71-105.
Maurer, S. M. and Scotchmer, S. (2004a), "A Primer for Nonlawyers on Intellectual Property", in Scotchmer, S. (2004), "Economics and Incentives", MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma., p.65-95.
Maurer, S. M. and Scotchmer, S. (2004b), "Innovation Today: A Private-Public Partnership", in Scotchmer, S. (2004), "Economics and Incentives", MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma., p.227-258.
Mehra, R. and E.C. Prescott, (1985) "The Equity Premium: A Puzzle", Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145--161.
Mueller, J. M. (2004), "The Evanescent Experimental Use Exemption from United States Patent Infringement Liability: Implications for University and Nonprofit Research and Development", Baylor Law Review, 56, p.917.
National Science Board (2005) "Science and Engineering Indicators 2006". Two volumes. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Peretto, P., (1998), "Technological Change and Population Growth", Journal of Economic Growth, 3, pp. 283-311.
Reinganum, J. (1985), "A Two-Stage Model of Research and Development with Endogenous Second Mover Advantages", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3, p. 275-292.
Roeger, W. (1995). "Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for US Manufacturing", Journal of Political Economy 103, 2, 316-330.
Scotchmer, S. (1996), "Protecting Early Innovators: Should Second-Generation Products Be Patentable?, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 27, pp. 29-41.
Scotchmer, S. (2004), "Economics and Incentives", MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Segerstrom, P.S. (1998), "Endogenous Growth Without Scale Effects," American Economic Review, vol. 88,n. 5, pp.1290-1310.
US Census (2010a), Current Population Survey, Historical Tables.
US Census (2010b), Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic supplements.
USPTO (2010), US Patent Statistics Chart - Calendar Years 1963-2010, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Young, A. (1998), "Growth without Scale Effects", Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41--63.