Puah, Chin-Hong and Habibullah, Muzafar Shah and Abu Mansor, Shazali (2008): Some Empirical Evidence on the Quantity Theoretic Proposition of Money in ASEAN-5. Published in: Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics , Vol. 18, No. 1 & 2 (2008): pp. 31-47.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_31768.pdf Download (126kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study examines the international evidence on long-run neutrality (LRN) of money based on low frequency data from five emerging ASEAN economies, namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand, using a nonstructural reduced-form bivariate ARIMA model proposed by Fisher and Seater (1993). Empirical evidence shows that the classical proposition cannot be rejected with respect to real export except for Thailand. However, the LRN test results are not robust to changes in money supply in countries under study with respect to real output. The narrow monetary aggregate seems to have greater impact on Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand economic activities as compared to the other two countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Some Empirical Evidence on the Quantity Theoretic Proposition of Money in ASEAN-5 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Long-run neutrality of money; ARIMA model; ASEAN |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General |
Item ID: | 31768 |
Depositing User: | Dr Chin-Hong Puah |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jun 2011 09:20 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 21:10 |
References: | Backus, D.K., & Kehoe, P.J. (1992). International evidence on the historical properties of business cycles. American Economic Review, 82, 864-888. Boschen, J.F., & Otrok, C.M. (1994). Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework: Comment. American Economic Review, 84, 1470-1473. Fisher, M.E., & Seater, J.J. (1993). Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA framework. American Economic Review, 83, 402-415. Haug, A.A., & Lucas, R.F. (1997). Long-run neutrality and superneutrality in an ARIMA Framework: Comment. American Economic Review, 87, 456-459. International Monetary Fund. (1980). International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: IMF. International Monetary Fund. (1990). International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: IMF. International Monetary Fund. (2005). International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: IMF. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimated and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210. Koustas, Z., & Serletis, A. (1999). On the Fisher effect. Journal of Monetary Economics, 44, 105-130. Leong, K., & McAleer, M. (2000). Testing long-run neutrality using intra-year data. Applied Economics, 32, 25-37. MacKinnon, J.G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601-618. Malliaropulos, D. (1995). Testing long-run neutrality of money: Evidence from the UK. Applied Economics Letters, 2, 347-350. Moosa, I.A. (1997). Testing the long-run neutrality of money in a developing economy: The case of India. Journal of Development Economics, 53, 139-155. Newey, W.K., & West, K.D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55, 703-708. Noriega, A.E. (2000). Neutrality and superneutrality of money in the Mexican economy: Further evidence under sequential unit root testing. Department of Econometrics Discussion Paper EM00-1, University of Guanajuato. Noriega, A.E. (2004). Long-run monetary neutrality and the unit-root hypothesis: Further international evidence. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 15(2), 179-197. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A note with quantiles of the asymptotic distribution of the maximum likelihood cointegration rank test statistics. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 461-472. Pantula, S.G. (1989). Testing for unit roots in time series data. Econometric Theory, 5, 256-271. Said, S.E., & Dickey, D.A. (1984). Testing for unit root in autoregressive-moving average of unknown order. Biometrika, 71, 599-607. Schwert, G.W. (1987). Effects of model specification tests for unit root in macroeconomic data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 20, 73-103. Serletis, A., & Koustas, Z. (1998). International evidence on the neutrality of money. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 30, 1-25. Serletis, A., & Krause, D. (1996). Empirical evidence on the long-run neutrality hypothesis using low-frequency international data. Economics Letters, 50, 323-327. Wallace, F.H. (1999). Long-run neutrality of money in the Mexican economy. Applied Economics Letters, 6, 637-639. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/31768 |