Valente, Simone (2011): Optimal policy and non-scale growth with R&D externalities.
Download (215kB) | Preview
An established result of the endogenous growth literature is that laissez-faire equilibria in expanding-varieties models are suboptimal due to the rent-effect: monopolistic pricing drives the equilibrium quantity of each intermediate input below the efficient level, implying that it is optimal to subsidize �final producers. This paper shows that, if scale effects are eliminated by introducing R&D spillovers, normative prescriptions change. Since the laissez-faire economy under-invests into R&D activity, the share of resources devoted to intermediates' production increases and this reallocation effect contrasts the rent-effect. In many scenarios, including the polar case of logarithmic preferences, the reallocation effect surely dominates. The equilibrium quantity of each intermediate exceeds the optimal level and the optimal policy consists of taxing, instead of subsidizing fi�nal producers because fi�scal authorities must redirect the extra-output generated by under-investment towards R&D activity.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Optimal policy and non-scale growth with R&D externalities|
|Keywords:||Endogenous Growth; Scale Effects; R&D Externalities; Optimal Policy;|
|Subjects:||O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
|Depositing User:||Simone Valente|
|Date Deposited:||29. Jul 2011 16:26|
|Last Modified:||16. Feb 2013 04:12|
Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Backus, D., Kehoe, P., Kehoe, T. (1992). In Search of Scale Effects in Trade and Growth. Journal of Economic Theory 57: 377-409.
Barro, R.J., Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Doi, J., Mino, K. (2005). Technological spillovers and patterns of growth with sector-speci�c R&D. Journal of Macroeconomics 27: 557-578.
Dinopoulos, E., Thompson, P. (1998). Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects. Journal of Economic Growth 3 (4): 313-335.
Jones, C. (1995). R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 103: 759-784.
Jones, C. (1999). Growth: With or Without Scale Effects?. American Economic Review - Papers and Proceedings 89 (2): 139-144.
Kortum, S. (1997). Research, Patenting, and Technological Change. Econometrica 65 (6): 1389-1419.
Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22: 3-42.
Peretto, P. (1998). Technological Change and Population Growth. Journal of Economic Growth 3 (4): 283-311.
Peretto, P., Smulders, S. (2002). Technological Distance, Growth and Scale Effects. Economic Journal 112: 603-624.
Rivera-Batiz, L.A., Romer, P.M. (1991). Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 531-555.
Romer, P. (1987). Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization. American Economic Review 77 (2): 56-62.
Romer, P.M. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): S71-S102.
Segerstrom, P. (1998). Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects. American Economic Review 88 (5): 1290-1310.
Young, A. (1998). Growth without Scale E¤ects. Journal of Political Economy 106 (1): 41-63.