Fiorillo, Damiano (2011): Household waste recycling: national survey evidence from Italy.
Download (156kB) | Preview
The paper analyses the determinants of household recycling in Italy with particular emphasis on social behaviour. The econometric analysis is based on two waves - 1998 and 2000 - of the Multipurpose Household Survey conducted annually by the Italian Central Statistics Office. In Italy household recycling was substantially voluntary in the years from 1998 to 2000 with no monetary incentives or pecuniary sanctions. Five different materials are investigated: paper, glass, plastic, aluminium and food waste. The results of the probit regressions suggest that membership in organizations, church attendance, the habit of talking politics and reading newspapers are significantly correlated with household recycling behaviour, while gender, age and household income playing the biggest role. Our findings also show that the presence of recycling bins for waste improves household recycling behaviour for all materials whereas difficulty to reach recycling bins adversely affects household recycling outcomes. Household judgments on waste disposal charges have no effect on the recycling effort. As expected, residency in Southern Italy is associated with the lowest probability of recycling all materials.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Household waste recycling: national survey evidence from Italy|
|English Title:||Household waste recycling: national survey evidence from Italy|
|Keywords:||Household recycling, social behaviour, social capital, recycling bins, flat fee|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C35 - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models ; Discrete Regressors ; Proportions
Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification
|Depositing User:||Damiano Fiorillo|
|Date Deposited:||22. Sep 2011 14:06|
|Last Modified:||02. Jan 2016 03:42|
Ando A. W., Gosselin A.Y., (2005), Recycling in multifamily dwellings: does convenience matter?, Economic Inquiry, 43, 426-438.
Andreoni J., (1990), Impure altruism and donations in public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving, Economic Journal, 100, 464-477.
APAT-ONR, Rapporto rifiuti, years 2001-2007
Bank of Italy, Archivio storico dell’Indagine sui bilanci delle famiglie italiane, years 1998-2000, Rome.
Derksen L., Gartrell J., (1993), The social context of recycling, American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.
Durlauf S.N., Fafchamps M., (2005). Social capital, in P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1B, Amsterdam, Elsevier North-Holland, 1639-1699.
Ferrara I., Missios P., (2005), Recycling and waste diversion effectiveness: evidence from Canada, Environmental & Resources Economics, 30, 221-238.
Fiorillo D., (2011), Do monetary rewards crowd out the intrinsic motivation of volunteers? Some empirical evidence for Italian volunteers, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 82, 139-165.
Fiorillo D., (2010), Voluntary work and domain satisfactions: evidence from Italy, Department of Economic Studies Discussion Paper 6.2010, University of Napoli Parthenope.
Fiorillo D., (2009), Capitale sociale “robusto”: analisi macro, evidenza micro, (2009), Rivista di Politica Economica, 1, 149-178.
Fullerton D., Kinnaman T. C., (1996), Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag, American Economic Review, 86, 971-984.
Hage O., Soderholm P., Berglund C., (2009), Norms and economic motivation in household recycling: empirical evidence for Sweden, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53, 155-165.
Halvorsen B., (2008), Effects of norms and opportunity cost of time on household recycling, Land Economics, 84, 501-516.
Hong S., Adams R.M., Love H.A., (1993), An economic analysis of household recycling of solid wastes: The case of Portland, Oregon, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 136-146.
Hopper J.R., McCarl Nielsen J., (1991), Recycling as altruistic behavior. Normative and behavioral strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program, Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.
Hornik J., Cherian J., Madansky M., Narayana C., (1995), Determinants of recycling behavior: a synthesis of research results, Journal of Socio-Economics, 24, 105-127.
Kipperber G., (2007), A comparison of household recycling behaviors in Norway and the United States, Environmental & Resources Economics, 36, 215-235.
Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (ISTAT), Indagine MULTISCOPO sulle famiglie, aspetti della vita quotidiana, years 1998-2000, Rome.
Jenkins R.R., Martinez S.A., Palmer K., Podolsky M.J., (2003), The determinants of household recycling: a material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 294-318.
Jones N., Evangelinos K., Halvadakis C.P., Iosifides T., Sophoulis C.M., Social factors influencing perceptions and willingness to pay for a market-based policy aiming on solid waste management, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 533-540.
Linderhof V., Kooreman P., Allers M., Wiersma D., (2001), Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste; the Oostzaan case, Resource and Energy Economics, 23, 359-371.
Martin M., Williams I.D., Clark M., (2006), Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 48, 357-395.
Nixon H., Saphores J.D.M., (2009), Information and the decision to recycles: results from a survey of US households, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52, 257-277.
Pretty J., (2003), Social capital and the collective management, Science, 302, 1912-1914.
Pretty J., Ward H., (2001), Social capital and the environment, World Development, 29, 209-227.
Putnam R. (with R. Leaonardi and R. Nanetti) (1993). Making democracy work, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press.
Rechovsky J.P., Stone S.E., (1994), Household incentives to encourage waste recycling: paying for what you throw away, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13, 120-139.
Richardson R.A., Havlicek J., (1978), Economic analysis of the composition of household solid wastes, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1, 103-111.
Schultz P.W., Oskamp S., Mainieri T., (1995), Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105-121.
Tongler M., Philipps P.S., Read A.D., (2004), Using a theory of planned behavior to investigate the determinants of recycling behavior: a case study from Brixworth, UK, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 191-214.
Tsai T., (2008), The impact of social capital on regional waste recycling, Sustainable Development, 16, 44-55.
Van Ha N., Kant S., Maclaren V., (2006), Relative shadow prices of social capital for household-level paper recycling units in Vietnam, Ecological Economics, 57, 520-533.
Van den Bergh J.C.J.M., (2008), Environmental regulation of households: an empirical review of economic and psychological factors, Ecological Economics, 559-574.
Vining J., Ebreo A., (1990), What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers, Environmental and Behavior, 22, 55-73.
Wertz K.L., (1976), Economic factors influencing households’ production of refuse, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2, 263-272.