Ronald Coase y los costos de transacción

Estrada, Fernando (2012): Ronald Coase y los costos de transacción.

Abstract

This paper relates to the implications of transaction costs in Ronald Coase. The economics of transaction costs (TCE) is a first-order theoretical framework for understanding both the constraints to the development of the company to warn gaps in current public policy developments with important implications. Finally it provides observations of public policy aimed at correcting deviations of government experience.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Ronald Coase and the transaction costs
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Ronald Coase, Transactions Costs Theory, Coase Theorem
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B15 - Historical ; Institutional ; Evolutionary; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B13 - Neoclassical through 1925 (Austrian, Marshallian, Walrasian, Stockholm School); L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity

References

Agencia de Noticias Universidad Nacional de Colombia, “Colombia, estancada en crecimiento de patentes”, Bogotá D.C, Enero, 30 de 2012.

Alfranca, O., Huffman, W.E., 2001, “Impact of institutions and public research on private agriculture research”. Agricultural Economics 25, 191–198.

Argyres, N., and Silverman, B., R&D, Organization Structure, and the Development of Corporate technological knowledge, Strategie Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. 7., 25: 929-958 (2004) Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com).

Arias et al. (2003), “Instituciones, Costos de Transacción y Políticas Públicas: Un panorama”, Revista de Economía Institucional, Vol. 5, No. 8.

Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Eads, G. C., Hahn, R. W., Lave, L. B., Noll, R. G., Portney, P. R., Russell, M., Schmalensee, R., Smith, V. K., and Stavins, R. N. (1996), ‘Is There a Role for Benefit–Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation?’, Science, 272(5259), 221.

BiotecVisions 2011, February A1–A8; 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Byerlee, D., Alex, G., Echeverría, R.G., 2002, “The evolution of public research systems in developing countries: facing new challenges”. In: Byerlee, D., Echeverría, R.G. (Eds.),Agricultural Research Policy in an Era of Privatization (Chapter 1). CABI, Oxon, UK, pp. 19–34.

Byerlee, D., Fischer, K., 2002, “Accessing modern science: policy and institutional options for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries”. World Development 30 (6), 931–948.

Calabresi, Guido (1968), ‘Transaction Costs, Resource Allocation and Liability Rules: A Comment’, Journal of Law and Economics, 67-73.

Calestous et al., “Biotechnology and the Precautionary Principle”, Inderscience Publishers, International Journal of Biotechnology, Volume 4, Number 1, 13 July 2003.

Campbell, Alison F. 2005, “The evolving of the concept of value add in university commercialization”, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 11, 4, pg. 337 – 345.

Cano (2003), “Los diez cimientos de las negociaciones internacionales de comercio en la agricultura”, Intervención del señor ministro de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural en el foro de Portafolio “Oportunidades y amenazas del ALCA y el TLC” Bogotá, septiembre 04.

Cantley, Mark, (2004), “How should public policy respond to the challenges of modern biotechnology?” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 15:258–263.

CGIAR Science Council, 2005a, “CGIAR Research Priorities 2005–2015”. ScienceCouncil Secretariat, Rome.

Coase, R. H. 1935. The problem of duopoly reconsidered, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 2, 137.

Coase, R. H. 1937A. “The nature of the firm”, p. 33 in Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds) 1991, The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Coase, R. H. 1937B. “Some notes on monopoly price”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 5, 17.

Coase, R. H. 1939. “Rowland Hill and the penny post”, Economica, vol. 6, 423

Coase, R. H. 1945. “Price and output policy of state enterprise: a comment”, Economic Journal, vol. 55, 112

Coase, R. H. 1946A. “BBC Enquiry?”, The Spectator, no. 176.

Coase, R. H. 1946B, “The marginal cost controversy”, p. 75 in Coase, R. H. 1988, The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Coase, R. H. 1947A, “The marginal cost controversy: some further comments”, Economics, vol. 14, 150.

Coase, R. H. 1947B,“The origin of the monopoly of broadcasting in Great Britain”, Economica, vol. 14, 189.

Coase, R. H. 1950A, “The BBC Monopoly, Time and Tide”, 7 October.

Coase, R. H. 1950B, British Broadcasting: A Study in Monopoly, London, London School of Economics and Political Science/Longmans, Green.

Coase, R. H. 1950C, “British television policy: questions of control and finance”, The Times, 9 September.

Coase, R. H. 1951, “Report on the BBC”, Time and Tide (20 January).

Coase, R. H. 1954, “The development of the British television service”, Land Economics, vol. 30, 207.

Coase, R. H. 1959, “The Federal Communications Commission”, The Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 2, 1.

Coase, R. H. 1960, “The problem of social cost”, p. 95 in Coase, R. H. 1988, The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.

Coase, R. H. 1961, “Why not use the price system in the broadcasting industry?” The Freeman, vol. 11, no. 7 (July).

Coase, R. H. 1962, “The Interdepartment Radio Advisory Committee”, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 5, 17.

Coase, R. H. 1964. Discussion of RE Caves, ‘Direct Regulation and Market Performance in the American Economy’ and RC Cramton, ‘The Effectiveness of Economic Regulation: A Legal View’, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 54, 194.

Coase, R. H. 1965. “Evaluation of public policy relating to radio and television broadcasting: social and economic issues”, Land Economics, vol. 41, 161

Coase, R. H. 1966, “The economics of broadcasting and government policy”, American Economic Review, (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 56, 440.

Coase, R. H. 1972, “Industrial organization: a proposal for research”, p. 57 in Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1974A, “Economists and public policy”, p. 47 in Coase, R. H. 1994 Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1974B, “The lighthouse in economics”, p. 187 in Coase, R. H. 1988 The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1977. “Advertising and Free Speech”, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 6, 1

Coase, R. H. 1981A, “How Should Economists Choose?” p.15 in Coase, R. H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1981B, “Economics at the LSE in the 1930s: A Personal View”, p. 208 in Coase, R. H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1983. “Comments”, in Kitch (ed.) 1983

Coase, R. H. 1986, “Arnold Plant, p.176 in Coase, R. H. 1994”, Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1988A. The Firm, the Market and the Law, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1988B. “The nature of the firm: influence”, p. 61 in Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds) 1991. The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press

Coase, R. H. 1988C. “The nature of the firm: meaning”, p. 48 in Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds) 1991. The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press

Coase, R. H. 1988D, “The nature of the firm: origin”, p. 34 in Williamson, O. E. and Winter, S. G. (eds) 1991. The Nature of the Firm, Oxford, Oxford University Press

Coase, R. H. 1990. “Accounting and the theory of the firm”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 12, 3

Coase, R. H. 1991A, “The institutional structure of production”, p. 3 in Coase, R. H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1991B. “George J. Stigler”, p. 199 in Coase, R. H. 1994. Essays on Economics and Economists, Chicago, University of Chicago Press

Coase, R. H. 1992, “Coase on Posner on Coase”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 149, 96

Coase (1994), La empresa, el mercado y la ley, El problema del coste social, Tha Nobel Foundation (1991), Alianza Editorial S.A., Madrid, (España).

Coase, R. H. 1995. “Ronald H. Coase”, p. 227 in Breit, W. and Spencer, R. W. (eds), Lives of the Laureates, 3rd edn, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press

Coase, R. H. 1996A. “Foreword”, p. xiii in Buckley, P. and Michie, J. (eds), Firms, Organisations and Contracts, Oxford, Oxford University Press

Coase, 1998A, “The new institutional economics”, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, vol. 88, 72

Coase, R. H, 1998B. “Comment on TW Hazlett”, ‘Assigning Property Rights to Radio Spectrum Users: Why Did FFC License Auctions Take 67 Years?’ Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 41, 577

Coase, R. H. and Barrett, E. W. 1968, “Educational TV: Who Should Pay?” Washington, DC, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

Coase, R. H. and Fowler, R. F. 1935B, “The pig-cycle: a rejoinder”, Economica, vol. 2, 423

Coase (1994), La empresa, el mercado y la ley, El problema del coste social, Tha Nobel Foundation (1991), Alianza Editorial S.A., Madrid, (España).