Semenov, Aggey (2012): Delegation to potentially uninformed agent.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_42080.pdf Download (175kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We consider a delegation problem with a potentially uninformed agent when the principal cannot use monetary payments. If the bias between the principal and the agent is large, then the optimal delegation set is an interval. When the bias is small or medium however, the optimal delegation set is no longer connected. It can be one of two types: with an interval and low option, the other with two intervals. In all cases the agent has less discretion. However, in the case of medium biases the principal delegates in a wider range than in the case of informed agent. In all cases the agent will be given more freedom if he is more informed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Delegation to potentially uninformed agent |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Delegation, non-informed agent, delegation set |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design |
Item ID: | 42080 |
Depositing User: | Aggey Semenov |
Date Deposited: | 28 Feb 2014 14:31 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 10:26 |
References: | 1. Amador, M., Bagwell, K. 2011. The theory of optimal delegation with an application to tariff caps. Working paper. Stanford University. 2. Alonso, R., Matouschek, N. 2008. Optimal delegation. Review of Economic Studies, 75:259-293. 3. Armstrong, M. 1995. Delegation and discretion. Mimeo. University College London. 4. Austen-Smith, D., 1994, Strategic Transmission of Costly Information, Econometrica, 62, 955-964. 5. Frankel, A., 2012. Delegating multiple decisions. Working paper, Chicago Booth. 6. Holmström, B. 1977. On incentives and control in organizations. PhD thesis. Stanford. 7. Holmström, B. 1984. On the theory of delegation. In: Bayesian models in economic theory. Elsevier Science Ltd. 8. Kovac, E., Mylovanov, T. 2009. Stochastic mechanisms in settings without monetary transfers: the regular case. Journal of Economic Theory, 114:1373-1395. 9. Lewis, T. Sappington, D. 1993. Ignorance in Agency Problem. Journal of Economic Theory, 61, 169-183. 10. Melumad, N., Shibano, T. 1991. Communication in Settings with no Transfers. Rand Journal of Economics, 22: 173-198. 11. Martimort, D., Semenov, A. 2006. Continuity in mechanism design without transfers. Economics Letters, 2006. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/42080 |