Mainstreaming Innovation in Europe. Findings on Employee Innovation and Workplace Learning from Belgium

De Spiegelaere, Stan and Van Gyes, Guy and Van Hootegem, Geert (2012): Mainstreaming Innovation in Europe. Findings on Employee Innovation and Workplace Learning from Belgium. Published in: Lifelong Learning in Europe , Vol. 4, No. 17 (December 2012)

Abstract

The EU is striving for an ‘Innovative Union’. Various case studies already hinted that the involvement of various types of employees is crucial for the organisational innovativeness. Using data from a large scale Belgian employee level survey in five industries, this article focuses on the question how ‘mainstream’ innovation is in Belgian firms and how this coincides with forms of workplace learning. Innovation mainstreaming here refers to the inclusion of various occupational groups in the innovation process. Findings suggest that innovation in most sectors, is an ‘elite driven’ process with only a limited involvement of lower level employees. Moreover, genuine employee-driven innovations are a rarity. Nevertheless, the research also finds that workplace learning (job training and in-work learning opportunities) are potentially strong levers for employee innovation for all types of employees. Specifically providing in-work learning opportunities to technical workers could make innovation more mainstream in Europe.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Employee Driven Innovation, Innovation Mainstreaming, Innovative Work Behaviour, Workplace Learning
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L., Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitatin the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265–285.

Castellacci, F. (2008). Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 37(6-7), 978–994. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.011

de Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2012). Job Design and Innovative Work Behavior: One size fits all? Differences between white- and blue-collar employees. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 8(In Press).

De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., Vandekerckhove, S., & Van Hootegem, G. (2012). Job Design and Innovative Work Behavior. Enabling Innovation through Active or Low-strain Jobs? HIVA Working Paper.

Ellinger, A. D. (2004). The Concept of Self-Directed Learning and Its Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(2), 158–177. doi:10.1177/1523422304263327

Ellström, P.-E. (2010). Practice-based innovation: a learning perspective. Journal of Workplace Learning, 22(1/2), 27–40. doi:10.1108/13665621011012834

European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (p. 35). European Commission.

Eurostat. (2008). Community Innovation Survey. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/

Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H., & Unwin, L. (2006). Improving Workplace Learning. Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (2012). International Stratification and Mobility File: Conversion Tools. Amsterdam: Department of Social Research Methodology. Retrieved from http://www.harryganzeboom.nl/ismf/index.htm

Harrington, H. J. (1995). Continuous versus breakthrough improvement: Finding the right answer. Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal, 1(3), 31–49. doi:10.1108/14637159510103211

Harrison, E., & Rose, D. (2006). The European Socio-economic Classification (ESeC) User Guide. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

Hippel, E. V. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press.

Høyrup, S. (2010). Employee-driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16(2), 143 –154. doi:10.1177/1024258910364102

Høyrup, S., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Hasse, C., Lotz, M., & Møller, K. (Eds.). (2012). Employee-Driven Innovation: A New Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347–364.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Day Books.

Robinson, A. G., & Schroeder, D. M. (2004). Ideas are Free. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers.

Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The Effects of Personal and contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go From Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

Terziovski, M. (2002). Achieving performance excellence through an integrated strategy of radical innovation and continuous improvement. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(2), 5–14. doi:10.1108/13683040210431419

Van Hootegem, G. (2000). De draaglijke traagheid van het management: tendensen in het productie- en personeelsbeleid. Acco.