Trade, productivity, income, and profit: the comparative advantage of structural axiomatic analysis

Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2011): Trade, productivity, income, and profit: the comparative advantage of structural axiomatic analysis.

Abstract

The classical case of comparative advantage is put into a new formal framework, that is, the behavioral axioms of standard economics are replaced by a set of structural axioms. This enables a comprehensive analysis that takes the effects on income and profit explicitly into account. The axioms in combination with the conditions of market clearing, budget balancing and initial zero profit determine all measurable variables objectively. It is the purpose of the present paper to formally restate the notion of comparative advantage and to ascertain whether this leads to a well-grounded new perspective on this time-honored doctrine.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: new framework of concepts; structure-centric; axiom set; consistency; comparative advantage; terms of trade; exchange rate; division of labor; factor immobility
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F16 - Trade and Labor Market Interactions; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F31 - Foreign Exchange

References

Arrow, K. J., and Hahn, F. H. (1991). General Competive Analysis. Amsterdam, New York, NY, etc.: North-Holland.

Boylan, T. A., and O’Gorman, P. F. (2007). Axiomatization and Formalism in Economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(2): 426–446.

Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.

Desai, M. (2008). Profit and Profit Theory. In S. N. Durlauf, and L. E. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, pages 1–11. Palgrave Macmillan, 2nd edition. URL http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_P000213.

Eaton, J., and Kortum, S. (2012). Putting Ricardo to Work. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2): 65–90.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011a). The Emergence of Profit and Interest in the Monetary Circuit. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1973952: 1–15. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1973952.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011b). The Pure Logic of Value, Profit, Interest. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1838203: 1–25. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1838203.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011c). Reconstructing the Quantity Theory (II). SSRN Working Paper Series, 1903663: 1–19. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903663.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2011d). Why Post Keynesianism is Not Yet a Science. SSRN Working Paper Series, 1966438: 1–15. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=1966438.

Kakarot-Handtke, E. (2012). The Rhetoric of Failure: A Hyper-Dialog About Method in Economics and How to Get Things Going. SSRN Working Paper Series, 2047177: 1–50. URL http://ssrn.com/abstract=2047177.

Keynes, J. M. (1973). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes Vol. VII. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Klant, J. J. (1984). The Rules of the Game. Cambridge, London, etc.: Cambridge University Press.

Mill, J. S. (2004). Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, chapter Of the Laws of Interchange Between Nations; and the Distribution of the Gains of Commerce among the Countries of the Commercial World, pages 5–39. Electronic Classic Series PA 18202: Pennsylvania State University. URL http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/jsmill/Unsettled-Questions.pdf.

Mirowski, P. (2004). The Effortless Economy of Science? Durnham, London: Duke University Press.

Nadal, A. (2004). Choice of Technique Revisted. A Critical Review of the Theoretical Underpinnings. In F. Ackerman, and A. Nadal (Eds.), The Flawed Foundations of General Equilibrium, pages 99–115. London, New York, NY: Routledge.

Niehans, J. (1994). A History of Economic Theory. Baltimore, MD, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ricardo, D. (1981). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge, New York, NY, etc.: Cambridge University Press.

Samuelson, P. A., and Nordhaus, W. D. (1998). Economics. Boston, MA, Burr Ridge, IL, etc.: Irwin, McGraw-Hill, 16th edition.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1994). History of Economic Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Stigum, B. P. (1991). Toward a Formal Science of Economics: The Axiomatic Method in Economics and Econometrics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Tómasson, G., and Bezemer, D. J. (2010). What is the Source of Profit and Interest? A Classical Conundrum Reconsidered. MPRA Paper, 20557: 1–34. URL http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20557/.