The effect of relative thinking on firm strategy and market outcomes: A location differentiation model with endogenous transportation costs

Azar, Ofer H. (2007): The effect of relative thinking on firm strategy and market outcomes: A location differentiation model with endogenous transportation costs. Forthcoming in: Journal of Economic Psychology

Abstract

Consumers often have to decide whether to go to a remote store for a lower price. Only the absolute price difference between the stores should be relevant in this case, but several experiments showed that people exhibit "relative thinking": they are affected also by the relative savings (relative to the good's price). This article analyzes the effects of this bias on firm strategy and market outcomes using a two-period game-theoretic model of location differentiation. Relative thinking causes consumers to make less effort to save a constant amount when they buy more expensive goods. In the location differentiation context this behavior can be modeled by consumers who behave as if their transportation costs are an increasing function of the good's price. This gives firms an additional incentive to raise prices, in order to increase the perceived transportation costs of consumers, which consequently softens competition and allows higher profits. Therefore, the response of firms to relative thinking raises prices and profits and reduces consumer surplus, in both periods. Total welfare is unchanged in the first period, and in the second period it is either unchanged or reduced, depending on whether the objective or subjective transportation costs are used to compute welfare. The main results of the model (firms' response to relative thinking increases prices and reduces consumer surplus) are likely to hold also in the context of search. The article also explains why "relative thinking" is a more appropriate term than "mental accounting" (which was often used before) to describe this behavior, and discusses why people might exhibit relative thinking.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
• Language: English
• Keywords: Competitive Strategy; Relative Thinking; Pricing; Mental Accounting; Consumer Psychology; Consumer Attitudes & Behavior; Cognitive Processes; Behavioral Decision Making; Industrial Organization; Product Differentiation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D10 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M31 - Marketing; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L10 - General; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection

References

Azar, O. H. (2004a). Psychological Motivations and Biases in Economic Behavior and their Effects on Markets and Firm Strategy. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University. Azar, O. H. (2004b). Do people think about absolute or relative price differences? Experimental evidence and implications. Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Azar, O. H. (2005a). Are transportation and search costs independent of the good's price? Some experimental evidence. Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Azar, O. H. (2005b). Does relative thinking exist in real-world situations? A field experiment. Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Azar, O. H. (2005c). Firm strategy and biased decision making: The price dispersion puzzle. Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Azar, O. H. (2006a). Relative thinking in consumer choice between differentiated goods and services. Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Azar, O. H. (2006b). Relative thinking and task performance: Does a larger fixed payment reduce the perceived magnitude of the pay-for-performance component? Working paper, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. Azar, O. H. (2007). Relative thinking theory. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 1-14. Dana, J. D., Jr. (1994). Learning in an equilibrium search model. International Economic Review, 35, 745-771. Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1993). Deciding whether to seek a bargain: Effects of both amount and percentage off. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 960-965. d'Aspremont, C., Gabszewicz, J., & Thisse, J.-F. (1979). On Hotelling's stability in competition. Econometrica, 17, 1145-1151. Duxbury, D., Keasey, K., Zhang, H., & Chow, S. L. (2005). Mental accounting and decision making: Evidence under reverse conditions where money is spent for time saved. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, 567-580. Frisch, D. (1993). Reasons for framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 399-429. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. The Economic Journal, 39, 41-57. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449-1475. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350. Miller, R. L. (1962). Dr. Weber and the consumer. Journal of Marketing, 26, 57-61. Moon, P., Keasey, K., & Duxbury, D. (1999). Mental accounting and decision making: The relationship between relative and absolute savings. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 145-153. Mowen, M. M., & Mowen, J. C. (1986). An empirical examination of the biasing effects of framing on business decisions. Decision Sciences, 17, 596-602. Ranyard, R., & Abdel-Nabi, D. (1993). Mental accounting and the process of multiattribute choice. Acta Psychologica, 84, 161-177. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 39-60. Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4, 199-214. Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183-206. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.