Escaping a Liquidity Trap: Keynes’ Prescription Is Right But His Reasoning Is Wrong

Harashima, Taiji (2013): Escaping a Liquidity Trap: Keynes’ Prescription Is Right But His Reasoning Is Wrong.

Abstract

Keynes’ original intention in introducing the concept of a liquidity trap was to explain the reason why persistent large amounts of unutilized resources were generated during the Great Depression. This paper shows that this type of phenomenon cannot be explained in the framework of a traditional competitive market equilibrium. Instead, it can be understood in terms of a Nash equilibrium consisting of strategies of choosing a Pareto inefficient transition path because a Nash equilibrium can conceptually coexist with Pareto inefficiency. Such a Nash equilibrium will be selected when an upwards time preference shock occurs. At this Nash equilibrium, monetary policies are useless but fiscal policies are very effective as Keynes argued, but for different reasons.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Liquidity trap; Monetary policy; Fiscal policy; Pareto inefficiency; Time preference
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

Alesina, Alberto and Alex Cukierman. (1990) “The Politics of Ambiguity,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 829–850.

Becker, Gary S. and Casey Mulligan (1997) “The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No. 3, pp. 729–758.

Benhabib, Jess, and Roger Farmer (2000) “Indeterminacy and Sunspots in Macroeconomics” , in John Taylor and Michael Woodford (eds.): Handbook of Macroeconomics, North Holland.

Benhabib, Jess, Stephanie Schmitt-Groh´e and Mart`ın Uribe (2001a) “The Perils of Taylor Rules”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 96, pp. 40–96.

Benhabib, Jess, Stephanie Schmitt-Groh´e and Mart`ın Uribe (2001b) “Monetary Policy and Multiple Equilibria”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp. 167–186.

Benhabib, Jess, Stephanie Schmitt-Groh´e and Mart`ın Uribe (2002) “Avoiding Liquidity Traps”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 110, No. 3, pp. 535–563.

Böhm-Bawerk, Eugen von (1889) Capital and Interest, Reprinted by Libertarian Press, South Holland, IL, 1970.

Brennan, Geoffrey and James M. Buchanan. (1980) The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge MA.

Christiano, Lawrence and Terry J. Fitzgerald. (2000) “Understanding the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level,” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Review, Q II, pp. 2-38.

Downs, Anthony. (1957) An economic theory of democracy, Harper, New York.

Edwards, Jeremy and Michael Keen. (1996) “Tax Competition and Leviathan,” European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 113–134.

Eggertsson, Gauti B. and Paul R. Krugman. (2012) “Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo Approach,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 127, No. 3, pp. 1469-1513.

Eggertsson, Gauti B. and Michael Woodford. (2003) “The Zero Bound on Interest Rates and Optimal Monetary Policy,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 34, pp. 139-233.

Fisher, Irving (1930) The Theory of Interest, Macmillan, New York

Friedman, Milton. (1969) The Optimal Quantity of Money and Other Essays, Aldine, Chicago.

Fuhrer, Jeff and George Moore. (1995) “Inflation Persistence,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, No. 1, pp. 127–159.

Galí, Jordi and Mark L. Gertler (1999) “Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Econometric Analysis,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 195–222.

Harashima, Taiji (2004a) “A More Realistic Endogenous Time Preference Model and the Slump in Japan,” EconWPA Working Papers, ewp-mac0402015.

Harashima, Taiji (2004b) “The Ultimate Source of Inflation: A Microfoundation of the Fiscal Theory of the Price Level,” EconWPA Working Papers, ewp-mac/ 0409018.

Harashima, Taiji (2008) “The Cause of the Great Inflation: Interactions between the Government and the Monetary Policymakers,” The Journal of World Economic Review, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 69-89.

Harashima, Taiji (2012) “A Mechanism of Cyclical Volatility in the Vacancy-Unemployment Ratio: What Is the Source of Rigidity?” The Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 36895.　

Harashima, Taiji (2013a) “The Optimal Quantity of Money Consistent with Positive Nominal Interest Rates,” Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 27-36 (in Japanese).

Harashima, Taiji (2013b) The Economics of Fiscal Deficits (Zaisei Akaji No Keizaigaku), Buitsu-Soryushon, Nagoya, Japan (in Japanese).

Jeanne, Olivier, and Lars E. O. Svensson (2007) “Credible Commitment to Optimal Escape from a Liquidity Trap: The Role of the Balance Sheet of an Independent Central Bank,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 97, pp. 474-490.

Keynes, John Maynard (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Macmillan Cambridge University Press, London.

Krugman, Paul R. (1998) “Its Baaack: Japans Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 29, pp. 137-187.

Lawrance, Emily C. (1991) “Poverty and the Rate of Time Preference: Evidence from Panel Data,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 1, pp. 54–77.

Mankiw, N. Gregory (2001) “The Inexorable and Mysterious Tradeoff between Inflation and Unemployment,” Economic Journal, Vol. 111, Issue 471, pp. C45–61

Morris, Stephen and Hyun Song Shin (2001) “Rethinking Multiple Equilibria in Macroeconomic Modeling,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Vol. 15, pp. 139–182.

Parkin, Michael (1988) “A Method for Determining Whether Parameters in Aggregative Models Are Structural,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 215–252.

Samuelson, Paul (1937) “A Note on Measurement of Utility,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 155–161.