Wang, Chengsi (2011): Informative Advertising, Consumer Search and Transparency Policy.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_34977.pdf Download (425kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Information about a new or non-frequently purchased product is often produced by both sides of the market. We construct a monopoly pricing model consisting of both seller's information disclosure and consumer's information acquisition. The presence of consumer search, which lowers the probability of making sales, creates incentive for the monopolist to deter search. In contrast with most previous literature, we show that, partial information disclosure arises in equilibrium when the search cost is low. As the search cost increases to medium level, the monopolist hides information but lowers the price to prevent consumers from searching. When the search cost is very high, the monopolist charges high price and hides all information. The equilibrium price is thus non-monotonic in search cost. Information disclosure and consumer search co-exist only when the search cost is low, and thus complement each other. We show that transparency policies on advertising cannot improve social welfare. Nevertheless, they benefit consumers in a wide range of values of the search costs by improving matching quality and reducing the expense of searching. But for some medium levels of search costs, transparency policies hurt consumers due to the induced high price in equilibrium.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Informative Advertising, Consumer Search and Transparency Policy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Monopoly Pricing, Information Disclosure, Information Acquisition, Search Cost, Transparency Policy |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M3 - Marketing and Advertising > M37 - Advertising D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly |
Item ID: | 51646 |
Depositing User: | Chengsi Wang |
Date Deposited: | 22 Nov 2013 08:21 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 02:05 |
References: | [1] Abernethy, A., G. Franke (1996): "The information content of advertising: a metaanalysis", Journal of Advertising, Vol. 25, No.2, pp. 1-17. [2] Anderson, S., R. Renault (2000): "Consumer Information and Firm Pricing: Negative Externalities from Improved Information", International Economic Review, Vol. 41, Issue 3, August, pp. 721-742. [3] Anderson, S., R. Renault (2006): "Advertising content", The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No.1, March, pp. 93-113. [4] Bar-Isaac, H., G. Caruana and V. Cunat (2010): "Information gathering and marketing", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 19, No. 2, Summer, pp. 375-401. [5] Bar-Isaac, H., G. Caruana and V. Cunat (2011): "Search, Design and Market Structure", American Economic Review, Forthcoming. [6] Bergemann, D. and J. Valimaki (2002): "Information acquisition and efficient mechanism design", Econometrica, Vol. 70, pp. 1007-1033. [7] Butters, G. (1977): "Equilibrium distributions of sales and advertising prices", The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3, May, pp. 465-491. [8] Ganuza, J., J. Penalva (2010): "Signal orderings based on dispersion and the supply of private information in auctions ", Econometrica, Vol. 78, Issue 3, May, pp. 1007-1030. [9] Ivanov, M. (2009): "Niche market or mass market?", Economics letters, Vol. 105, Issue 3, pp. 217-220. [10] Ivanov, M. (2009): "Information revelation in competitive markets", McMaster University working paper. 28 [11] Janssen, M., M. Non (2008): "Advertising and Consumer Search in a Duopoly Model", International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 354-71. [12] Janssen, M., M. Non (2009): "Going Where the Ad Leads You: On High Advertised Prices and Searching Where to Buy", Marketing Science, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 87-98. [13] Johnson, J., D. Myatt (2006): "On the simple economics of advertising, marketing, and product design", The American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No. 3, June, pp. 756-784. [14] Lewis, T., D. Sappington (1994): "Supplying information to facilitate price discrimination", International Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 2, May, pp. 309-327. [15] Milgrom, P. (1981): "Good news or bad news: representation theorems and applications", Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, No. 2, May, pp. 380-391. [16] Robert, J., D. Stahl (1993): "Informative price advertising in a sequential search model", Econometrica, Vol. 61, No. 3, pp. 657-686. [17] Shi, X. (2009): "Optimal auction and information acquisition", University of Toronto working paper. [18] Stegeman, M. (1986): "Essays in search and speculation", MIT PhD thesis. [19] Wolinsky, A. (1986): "True monopolistic competition as a result of imperfect information", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 101, No. 3, August, pp. 493-511. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/51646 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Informative Advertising, Consumer Search and Transparency Policy. (deposited 24 Nov 2011 14:44)
- Informative Advertising, Consumer Search and Transparency Policy. (deposited 22 Nov 2013 08:21) [Currently Displayed]