Gurgul, Henryk and Lach, Łukasz (2010): International trade and economic growth in the Polish economy. Published in: Operations Research and Decisions , Vol. 20, (2010): pp. 529.

PDF
MPRA_paper_52286.pdf Download (325kB)  Preview 
Abstract
In this paper the results of linear and nonlinear causality examination performed for openness of Polish economy and its economic growth are presented. In order to extract the impact of world crisis on Polish economy we decided to apply two samples (containing quarterly data) – the full sample (Q1 1996 – Q3 2009) and precrisis sample (Q1 1996 – Q3 2008). The applied linear causality tests support the existence of feedback between growth rate of exports and GDP growth irrespectively of chosen time period. For both examined samples no direct causal links between growth rates of GDP and imports were detected, one can only suppose the existence of indirect links before the crisis. Bidirectional causality was found for growth rates of exports and imports only for precrisis sample. Some weak evidence of causal link running from growth rate of imports to exports growth rate was also found for data that covers crisis, which may somehow be interpreted as a confirmation of the fact that import growth precedes exports growth also in hectic periods. It results from our computations that in time of financial crisis of 2008 the main factor that caused Polish GDP to remain positive was the domestic demand. The results of nonlinear causality analysis provided only some weak evidence of causality running from GDP to exports, from GDP to imports and from imports to exports.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  International trade and economic growth in the Polish economy 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  exports, imports, openness, economic growth, Granger causality 
Subjects:  C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3  Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32  TimeSeries Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models F  International Economics > F1  Trade > F10  General O  Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4  Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40  General 
Item ID:  52286 
Depositing User:  Dr Łukasz Lach 
Date Deposited:  18. Dec 2013 17:54 
Last Modified:  18. Dec 2013 18:00 
References:  [1] AHMAD J., KWAN A.C., Causality between exports and economic growth: empirical evidence from Africa, Economics Letters, 1991, Vol. 37, pp. 243–248. [2] ANDREWS D.W.K., BUCHINSKY M., A ThreeStep Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions, Econometrica, 2000, Vol. 68(1), pp. 2352. [3] AWOKUSE T.O., Causality between exports, imports, and economic growth: Evidence from transition economies, Economics Letters, 2007, Vol. 94(3), pp. 389395. [4] BAEK E., BROCK W., A general test for Granger causality: Bivariate model, Technical Report, 1992, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison. [5] BAHMANIOSKOOEE M., ALSE J., Export growth and economic growth: an application of cointegration and error correction modeling, Journal of Developing Areas, 1993, Vol. 27(4), pp. 535–542. [6] BALASSA B., Exports and economic growth: further evidence, Journal of Development Economics, 1978, Vol. 5(2), pp. 181–189. [7] BALASSA B., Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shock, Journal of Development Economics, 1985, Vol. 18, pp. 23–35. [8] BEWLEY R., YANG M., On the size and power of system tests for cointegration, In McAleer M. et al. (eds), Proceedings of Econometric Society of Australasian Meeting, 1996, Perth, Australia. [9] BROCK W., Causality, chaos, explanation and prediction in economics and finance, In Casti J., Karlqvist A. (eds), Beyond Belief: Randomness, Prediction and Explanation in Science, 1991, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. [10] ÇETINTAŞ H., BARIŞIK S., Export, Import and Economic Growth: The Case of Transition Economies, Transition Studies Review, 2009, Vol. 15(4), pp. 636649. [11] CHELLIAH R.R., Significance of Alternative Concepts of Budget Deficit, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 1973, Vol. 20, pp. 741784. [12] CHEN A.S., LIN J.W., Cointegration and detectable linear and nonlinear causality: analysis using the London Metal Exchange lead contract, Applied Economics, 2004, Vol. 36, pp. 11571167. [13] CHOU P.H., ZHOU G., Using Bootstrap to Test Portfolio Efficiency, Annals of economics and finance, 2006, Vol. 2, pp. 217–249. [14] CHOW P.C.Y., Causality between export growth and industrial performance: evidence from NICs, Journal of Development Economics, 1987, Vol. 26(1), pp. 55–63. [15] DARRAT A.F., Trade and development: the Asian experience, Cato Journal, 1986, Vol. 6, pp. 695–699. [16] DAVISON A.C., HINKLEY D.V., Bootstrap Methods and Their Application, 1999, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [17] DIKS C.G.H., DEGOEDE J., A general nonparametric bootstrap test for Granger causality, In Broer H.W., Krauskopf W., Vegter G. (eds), Global analysis of dynamical systems, 2001, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, United Kingdom. [18] DIKS C.G.H., PANCHENKO V., A note on the HiemstraJones test for Granger noncausality, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2005, Vol. 9, No. 2, Article 4. [19] DIKS C.G.H., PANCHENKO V., A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric Granger causality testing, Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 2006, Vol. 30, pp. 16471669. [20] DODARO S., Exports and growth: a reconsideration of causality, Journal of Developing Areas 1993, Vol. 27, pp. 227–244. [21] DOLADO J.J., LÜTKEPOHL H., Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR systems, Econometrics Reviews, 1996, Vol. 15, pp. 369–386. [22] DOYLE E., Exportoutput causality: the Irish case 1953–93, Atlantic Economic Journal, 1998, Vol. 26(2), pp. 147–161. [23] FEDER G., On exports and economic growth, Journal of Development Economics, 1982, Vol. 12, pp. 59–73. [24] GILES D.E.A., GILES J.A., MCCANN E., Causality, unit roots, and exportled growth: the New Zealand experience, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 1992, Vol. 1, pp. 195–218. [25] GILES J.A., MIRZA S., Some pretesting issues on testing for Granger noncausality, 1998, Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Victoria. [26] GILES J.A., WILLIAMS C.L., Exportled growth: a survey of the empirical literature and some noncausality results, Econometric Working Paper EWP9901, 1999, Department of Economics, University of Victoria. [27] GRANGER C.W.J., NEWBOLD P., Spurious regression in econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 1974, Vol. 2, pp. 111–120. [28] GRANGER C.W.J., Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods, Econometrica, 1969, Vol. 37, pp. 424–438. [29] GURGUL H., LACH Ł., Linear versus nonlinear causality of DAX companies, Operations Research and Decisions, 2009, Vol. 3, pp. 2746. [30] HACKER R.S., HATEMIJ.A., Tests for causality between integrated variables using asymptotic and bootstrap distributions: theory and application, Applied Economics, 2006, Vol. 38, pp. 1489–1500. [31] HAMILTON J.D., Time Series Analysis, 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton. [32] HELPMAN E., KRUGMAN P., Market Structure and Foreign Trade, 1985, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [33] HIEMSTRA C., JONES J.D., Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock pricevolume relation, Journal of Finance, 1994, Vol. 49, pp. 1639–1664. [34] HOROWITZ J.L., Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Chapter 7: Bootstrap methods in econometrics: Theory and numerical performance, 1995, Cambridge University Press. [35] HSIAO M.C.W., Tests of causality and exogenity between exports and economic growth: the case of the Asian NIC’s, Journal of Economic Development 1987, Vol. 12(2), pp. 143–159. [36] JUNG W.S., MARSHALL P.J., Exports, growth and causality in developing countries, Journal of Development Economics, 1985, Vol. 18(1), pp. 1–12. [37] KWIATKOWSKI D., PHILLIPS P.C.B., SCHMIDT P., SHIN Y., Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?, Journal of Econometrics, 1992, Vol. 54, pp. 159–178. [38] LACH Ł., Application of bootstrap methods in investigation of size of the Granger causality test for integrated VAR systems, to appear in Managing Global Transition in 2010. [39] LOTZ R.R., MORSS E.R., Measuring Tax Effort in Developing Countries, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 1967, Vol.14. [40] LÜTKEPOHL H., Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, 2nd ed., 1993, SpringerVerlag, New York. [41] MANTALOS P., A Graphical Investigation of the Size and Power of the GrangerCausality Tests in IntegratedCointegrated VAR Systems, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 2000, Vol. 4, Issue 1, Article no. 2 [42] MICHAELY M., Exports and growth: an empirical investigation, Journal of Development Economic, 1977, Vol. 4(1), pp. 149–153. [43] PHILLIPS P.C.B., Understanding the spurious regression in econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 1986, Vol. 33, pp. 311–340. [44] RAM R., Exports and economic growth in developing countries: evidence from time series and crosssection data, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1987, Vol. 36, pp. 51–72. [45] RAMOS F.F.R., Exports, Imports and Economic Growth in Portugal: Evidence from Causality and Cointegration Analysis, Economic Modelling, 2001, Vol. 18, pp. 613623. [46] SHAN J., SUN F., On the exportled growth hypothesis for the little dragons: an empirical reinvestigation, Atlantic Economic Journal, 1998, Vol. 26, pp. 353–371. [47] SIMS C.A., Money, income, and causality, The American Economic Review, 1972, Vol. 62, pp. 540–552. [48] SKAUG H.J., TJØSTHEIM D., Nonparametric tests of serial independence, In Subba Rao T. (ed), Developments in time series analysis, 1993, Chapman and Hall, London. [49] THORNTON J., Cointegration, causality and exportled growth in Mexico, 1895–1992, Economics Letters, 1996, Vol. 50, pp. 413–416. [50] TODA H.Y., Finite sample properties of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration ranks when linear trends are present, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1994, Vol. 76, pp. 66–79. [51] TODA H.Y., YAMAMOTO T., Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes, Journal of Econometrics, 1995, Vol. 66, pp. 225–250. [52] TYLER W.G., Growth and export expansion in developing countries: some empirical evidence, Journal of Development Economics, 1981, Vol. 9, pp. 121–130. [53] VENABLES A., Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review, 1996, Vol. 37, pp. 341–359. [54] XU Z., On the causality between export growth and GDP growth: an empirical evidence, Review of International Economics, 1996, Vol. 4(6), pp. 172–184. [55] ZAPATA H.O., RAMBALDI A.N., Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1997, Vol. 59, pp. 285–298. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/52286 