Understanding the Sims-Cogley-Nason Approach in A Finite Sample

Liu, Lin and Hussain, Syed (2013): Understanding the Sims-Cogley-Nason Approach in A Finite Sample.

Abstract

Kehoe2006 advocates that in evaluating an economic model, the Sims-Cogley-Nason (SCN) approach should be adopted in which empirical impulse responses are compared to those obtained from the identical structural VAR run on model generated data of the same length as actual observations. This paper examines, using Monte Carlo simulation, finite sample properties of the SCN approach. Throughout the paper, we use the simple textbook New-Keynesian model as data generating process, and focus on effects of the identified monetary shocks, derived by structural VAR with short-run identification assumption. We find that when the model violates the identifying restriction and monetary shocks are misidentified, the SCN approach has poor small sample performance. We show that: 1) The estimated impulse responses are biased and uninformative; 2) The parameter estimates derived by matching impulse responses are biased and with large mean square error. Ironically, the very reason calling for the SCN approach - mis-identification, is also the cause for its poor finite sample performance.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Sims-Cogley-Nason Approach, Finite Sample Property, Structural VAR, New-Keynesian Model, Monetary Policy Shocks.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit

References

Carlstrom, Charles T. and Fuerst, Timothy S. and Paustian, Matthias, "Monetary policy shocks, Choleski identification, and DNK models", Journal of Monetary Economics 2009

Chari, Varadarajan and Kehoe, Patrick and McGrattan, Ellen R., "Are structural VARs with long-run restrictions useful in developing business cycle theory?", Journal of Monetary Economics 2008

Lawrence J. Christiano and Martin Eichenbaum and Charles L. Evans, "Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy", Journal of Political Economy 2005

Lawrence J. Christiano and Martin Eichenbaum and Robert Vigfusson, "Assessing Structural VARs", NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2006, Volume 21

Chari, Varadarajan and Kehoe, Patrick and McGrattan, Ellen R., "A critique of structural VARs using real business cycle theory", Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Working Paper 2005

Kehoe, Patrick J., "Assessing Structural VARs: Comment", NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2006, Volume 21

Rudebusch, Glenn D, "Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense?", International Economic Review 1998

Christiano, Lawrence J, "Solving Dynamic Equilibrium Models by a Method of Undetermined Coefficients", Computational Economics 2002

Cogley, Timothy and James M. Nason, "Output Dynamics in Real-Business-Cycle Models", American Economic Review 1995

Sims, Christopher A., "Models and Their Uses", American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1989

Lawrence J. Christiano and Martin Eichenbaum and Charles L. Evans, "Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end?", Handbook of Macroeconomics 1999

Frank Smets and Rafael Wouters, "Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Aayesian DSGE Approach",American Economic Review 2007