Dziewulski, Pawel (2014): Revealed time-preference.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_56596.pdf Download (450kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Consider an experiment in which subjects are asked to choose between pairs consisting of a monetary payment and a time-delay at which the payment is delivered. Given a finite set of observations, under what conditions the choices of an individual agent can be rationalised by a discounted utility function? We develop an axiomatic characterisation of time-preference with various forms of discounting, including weakly present-biased, quasi-hyperbolic, and exponential, and determine the testable restrictions for each specification. Moreover, we discuss identification issues which may arise in this class of experiments.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Revealed time-preference |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | revealed preference, testable restrictions, rationalisation, time{-}preference, discounted utility |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14 - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C60 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis |
Item ID: | 56596 |
Depositing User: | Mr Pawel Dziewulski |
Date Deposited: | 14 Jun 2014 06:17 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 16:32 |
References: | Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76 (3), 583–618. Benhabib, J., A. Bisin, and A. Schotter (2010). Present-bias, quasi-hyperbolic discounting, and fixed costs. Games and Economic Behavior 69 (2), 205–223. Border, K. C. (1992). Revealed preference, stochastic dominance, and the expected utility hypothesis. Journal of Economic Theory 56, 20–42. Chabris, C. F., D. Laibson, C. L. Morris, J. P. Schuldt, and D. Taubinsky (2008). Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 37 (2), 237–269. Chabris, C. F., D. Laibson, C. L. Morris, J. P. Schuldt, and D. Taubinsky (2009). The Allocation of Time in Decision-Making. Journal of the European Economic Association 7 (2-3), 628–637. Coller, M. and M. Williams (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics 2 (2), 107–127. Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, and U. Sunde (2012). Interpreting time horizon effects in inter-temporal choice. Discussion Paper No. 6385, IZA. Echenique, F., T. Imai, and K. Saito (2014). Testable implications of quasi-hyperbolic and exponential discounting. Caltech SS Working Paper 1388. Fishburn, P. C. and A. Rubinstein (1982). Time Preference. International Economic Review 23 (3), 677–94. Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. O’Donoghue (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2), 351–401. Harrison, G. W., M. I. Lau, and M. B. Williams (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment. American Economic Review 92 (5), 1606–1617. Kirby, K. N. and N. N. Marakovic (1964). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease and amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 100–104. Kirby, K. N., N. M. Petry, and W. K. Bickel (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 128, 78–87. Kraft, C. H., J. W. Pratt, and A. Seidenberg (1959). Intuitive probability on finite sets. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30, 408–419. Nishimura, H., E. A. Ok, and J. K.-H. Quah (2013). A Unified Approach to Revealed Preference Theory: The Case of Rational Choice. Economics Series Working Papers 686, University of Oxford, Department of Economics. Noor, J. (2011). Intertemporal choice and the magnitude effect. Games and Economic Behavior 72 (1), 255–270. Ok, E. A. and Y. Masatlioglu (2007). A theory of (relative) discounting. Journal of Economic Theory 137 (1), 214–245. Scott, D. (1964). Measurement structures and linear inequalities. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1, 233–247. Stoer, J. and C. Witzgall (1970). Convexity and optimization in finite dimensions I. Springer Verlag, Berlin. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/56596 |