Leverage versus volatility: Evidence from the Capital Structure of European Firms

el Alaoui, AbdelKader and Masih, Mansur and Bacha, Obiyathulla and Asutay, Mehmet (2014): Leverage versus volatility: Evidence from the Capital Structure of European Firms.

Abstract

The capital structure theory advocates a mix between debt and equity to optimize a firm‘s value (Modigliani & Miller, 1958). However, Islamic finance recognizes more conservative levels of debt for firms, based not on capital structure, but on debt to total assets or debt to market capitalization. This study is the first attempt to investigate the role of leverage in affecting the returns and the firm‘s share price volatility in relation to an Islamic finance perspective (IFP). The paper is based on a sample of 320 European companies distributed into different portfolios with high and low debt, high and low assets and focused on ten different countries. Comparative portfolio analysis was used to obtain a number of testable hypotheses, which specify the factors at the level of the firm and at the level of the market, in order to determine optimal financial risk. Specifically, we use the mean variance efficient frontier (MVEF) to confirm, in accordance with the theory, that a portfolio with a higher capital structure has higher volatility and lower returns compared to a portfolio with a lower capital structure. Then, the Shari‘ah screening method of improving the firm‘s stability in the market has been analyzed based on econometric analysis. Dynamic GMM is used in order to correlate the firm‘s leverage to total assets with its return and volatility in portfolios with high and low capital structure. To ensure the robustness of results, the business cycle effects have been considered after adding the firm and the country characteristics with a view to taking into account the heterogeneity across different firms and different markets. The preliminary results tend to indicate that there are significant correlations between capital structure and both returns and volatility, but not necessarily with high debt to assets given different sizes and growth of firms. The paper suggests that are three main factors which need to be considered by the firms in order to improve their stability in the market: firstly, the level of capital structure but not the debt to total assets as suggested by some scholars using the IFP; secondly, the capitalization or the firm size and finally, the level of the sovereign debt and country dynamics. Although the latter may be beyond the firm‘s control, it is up to the firm to consider its own market with implications on its leverage policy in relation to the frequency-dependent strategy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Volatility, leverage, dynamic GMM, Wavelet Time–frequency analysis
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G15 - International Financial Markets

References

Ait-Sahalia, J., Cacho-Diaz, J., Laeven, R.J.A., 2010. Modeling financial contagion using mutually exciting jump processes. NBER Working Paper No. 15850, p. 150.

Bae K. H., Karolyi G. A. and Stulz R. M., A new approach to measuring financial contagion. Rev. Financial Stud. v16. 716-763.

Baig, T., Goldfajn, I., 1998. Financial market contagion in the Asian crises. IMF Working Paper No. 98/155.

Billio M. & Caporin M. 2010. ―Market linkages, variance spillovers, and correlation stability: Empirical evidence of financial contagion‖, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, v.54 n.11, p.2443-2458, November, 2010 [doi>10.1016/j.csda.2009.03.018]

Bodart, V. and Candelon, B. 2009. Evidences of interdependence and contagion using a frequency domain framework. Emerg. Mark. Rev. v10. 140-150.

Calvo, S. and Reinhart, C. 1996. Capital flows to Latin America: is there evidence of contagion effects?. In: Calvo, G., Goldstein, M., And Hochreiter, E.(eds), Private Capital Flows to Emerging Markets, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, 1996.

Cashin, P., Kumar, M.S., McDermott, C.J., 1995. International integration of equity markets and contagion effects. IMF Working Papers No. 95/110.

Chou, R.Y.-T., Ng, V., Pi, L.K., 1994. Cointegration of international stock market indices. IMF Working Papers No. 94/94.

Corsetti, G., Pericoli, M., Sbracia, M., 2001. Correlation analysis of financial contagion: what one should know before running a test. Banca d I talia Temi di Discussione No. 408.

Corsetti G., Pericoli M. and Sbracia M.,2005. Some contagion, some interdependence: more pitfalls in tests of financial contagion. J. Int. Money Fin. v24. 1177-1199.

Costinot, A., Roncalli, T., Teletche, J., 2000. Revisiting the dependence between financial markets with copulas. Working Paper Credit Lyonnais.

Daubechies, 1992. In: CBSM-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM, Philadelphia.

Dornbusch R., Park Y. C., Claessens S., 2000. Contagion: understanding how it spreads. World Bank Res. Obs. v15. 177-197.

Dungey M. and Tambakis D. N., (2003). "International Financial Contagion: What Do We Know?", - WORKING PAPER NO 9 - July 2003

Eichengreen B., Rose A. and Wyplosz C., 1996. Contagious currency crises: first tests. Scand. J. Statist. v98. 463-484.

Engsted, T. and Tanggaard, C., 2004. The comovement of US and UK stock markets. European Financ. Manage. v10. 593-607.

Forbes, K. and Rigobon, R., 2002. No contagion, only interdependence: measuring stock markets comovements. J. Financ. v57. 2223-2261.

Gallo, G. and Otranto, E., 2008. Volatility spillovers, interdependence and comovements: A Markov Switching approach, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, v.52 n.6, p.3011-3026, February, 2008 [doi > 10.1016 / j.csda.2007.09.016]

Gencay R, Selcuk F and Whitcher B., 2001. Scaling properties of exchange rate volatilities. Physica A. v289. 89-106.

Gencay R., and Selcuk F., 2002. An Introduction to Wavelets and Other Filtering Methods in Finance and Economics. San Diego Academic Press, San Diego.

Gencay R, Selcuk F and Whitcher B., 2005. Multiscaling systematic risk. J. Int. Money Financ. v24. 55-70.

Hamada, R.S., 1972. Effect of firms capital structure on systematic risk of common stocks. Journal of Finance 27, 435–452.

Hamao Y., 1990. Correlations in price changes and volatility across international stock markets. Rev. Financial Stud. v3. 281-307.

Hochreiter M., E. (Eds.). ―Private Capital Flows to Emerging Markets After the Mexican Crisis‖, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.

Kaminsky, G. and Reinhart, C., 2000. On crises, contagion, and confusion. J. Int. Econom. v51. 145-168.

King, M. and Wadhwani, S., 1990. Transmission of volatility between stock markets. Rev. Financial Stud. v3. 5-33.

Lee and Kim, 1993. Does the October 1987 crash strengthen the comovements among national stock markets?. Rev. Financial Econom. v3. 89-102.

Longin, F. and Solnik, B., 1995. Is the correlation in international equity returns constant: 1960-1990?. J. Int. Money Finance. v14. 3-26.

Orlov, A., 2009. Co-spectral analysis of exchange rate comovements during Asian financial crisis. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money. v19. 742-758.

Percival and Walden, 2000. Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Pericoli, M. and Sbracia, M. 2003. A primer on financial contagion. J. Econom. Sur. v17. 571-608.

Rodriguez, J., 2007. Measuring financial contagion: a copula approach. J. Empir. Finance. v14. 401-423.

Whitcher B., 2000. Wavelet analysis of covariance with application to atmospheric time series. J. Geophys. Res. Atmosph. v105. 14941-14962.