Jin, Xin (2014): Flattening Firms and Wage Distribution.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_58485.pdf Download (156kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article studies the consequences of firm delayering on wages and the wage distribution inside firms. I consider a job-assignment model with asymmetric information and a slot constraint. The model predicts that more efficient firms are not necessarily larger than less efficient firms if firms are allowed to adjust their internal organizational structure through delayering. After delayering, wages at all levels increase and the wage distribution becomes more unequal. These predictions match a set of empirical findings in recent studies that are not well explained by existing theories.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Flattening Firms and Wage Distribution |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | delayer, asymmetric information, promotion, slot constraint |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M51 - Firm Employment Decisions ; Promotions |
Item ID: | 58485 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Xin Jin |
Date Deposited: | 10 Sep 2014 23:25 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 12:49 |
References: | Bauer, T. K., & Bender, S. (2001). Flexible Work Systems and the Structure of Wages: Evidence from Matched Employer-Employee Data, IZA working paper. Bernhardt, D. (1995). Strategic promotion and compensation. The Review of Economic Studies, 62(2), 315-339. Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Does product market competition lead firms to decentralize? The American Economic Review, , 434-438. Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339-376. Caliendo, L., Monte, F., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2012). The Anatomy of French Production Hierarchies, Working Paper. Caliendo, L., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2012). The impact of trade on organization and productivity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1393-1467. Calvo, G. A., & Wellisz, S. (1979). Hierarchy, ability, and income distribution. The Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 991. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2008). The economics of organizational design: Theoretical insights and empirical evidence. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (1999). Some stylized facts on organization and its evolution. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 40(3), 255-274. DeVaro, J., & Waldman, M. (2012). The signaling role of promotions: Further theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 30(1), 91-147. Garicano, L. (2000). Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. The Journal of Political Economy, 108(5), 874-904. Garicano, L., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2006). Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1383-1435. Gibbons, R., & Waldman, M. (1999). A theory of wage and promotion dynamics inside firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1321-1358. Gibbons, R., & Waldman, M. (1999). Careers in organizations: Theory and evidence. In O. C. Ashenfelter, & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, vol.3 (Orley C. Ashenfelter and David Card ed., pp. 2373-2437). Amsterdam: North-Holland: Greenwald, B. C. (1986). Adverse selection in the labour market. The Review of Economic Studies, 53(3), 325-347. Guadalupe, M., & Wulf, J. (2010). The flattening firm and product market competition: The effect of trade liberalization on corporate hierarchies. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(4), 105-127. Harris, M., & Holmstrom, B. (1982). A theory of wage dynamics. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(3), 315-333. Kahn, L. B. (2013). Asymmetric information between employers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4), 165-205. Lazear, E. P., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864. Milgrom, P., & Oster, S. (1987). Job discrimination, market forces, and the invisibility hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 453-476. Murphy, K. J., & Zabojnik, J. (2004). CEO pay and appointments: A market-based explanation for recent trends. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 192-196. Murphy, K., & Zabojnik, J. (2007). Managerial capital and the market for CEOs. Available at SSRN 984376 Pinkston, J. C. (2009). A model of asymmetric employer learning with testable implications. Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 367-394. Qian, Y. (1994). Incentives and loss of control in an optimal hierarchy. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(3), 527-544. Rajan, R. G., & Wulf, J. (2006). The flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 759-773. Rosen, S. (1982). Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 311-323. Rosen, S. (1986). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 701-715. Smeets, V., Waldman, M., & Warzynski, F. (2013). Performance, career dynamics, and span of control. Working Paper. Waldman, M. (1984). Job assignments, signaling, and efficiency. The Rand Journal of Economics, 15(2), 255-267. Waldman, M. (1984). Worker allocation, hierarchies and the wage distribution. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(1), 95-109. Waldman, M. (2003). Ex ante versus ex post optimal promotion rules: The case of internal promotion. Economic Inquiry, 41(1), 27-41. Waldman, M. (2012). Classic promotion tournaments versus market-based tournaments. International Journal of Industrial Organization, (0), Available online 21 March 2012. Williamson, O. E. (1967). Hierarchical control and optimum firm size. The Journal of Political Economy, 75(2), 123-138. Zabojnik, J., & Bernhardt, D. (2001). Corporate tournaments,human capital acquisition, and the firm Size-Wage relation. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(3), 693-716. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/58485 |