Housing finance and financial stability: evidence from Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore

Hanifa, Mohamed Hisham and Masih, Mansur (2013): Housing finance and financial stability: evidence from Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore.

Abstract

This paper discusses current housing finance practices in three emerging economies such as, Malaysia, Thailand and Singapore, as well as the impact of those practices on financial stability. National authorities and policymakers may find this analysis helpful as they reassess the structure and health of their housing finance systems, with particular attention given to those factors that have contributed to a stable housing finance system. The methodology used to determine the factors was panel cointegration and dynamic OLS. The country-specific housing finance systems vary significantly and have sometimes been shaped by pivotal historic events. Today’s housing finance systems are determined by a range of factors, including the products offered to investors (floating or fixed interest rates over various maturities); the use of prepayment penalties; funding (deposits versus capital markets); the degree of lender recourse to defaulted borrowers’ other assets and income; and government participation, including tax breaks. While different systems can work well to provide stable housing finance, a number of best practices emanate from the discussion and empirical analyses. They are enhanced underwriting and supervision; better calibrated government participation; and betteraligned incentives in capital-market mortgage funding. The paper concludes with a number of policy recommendations to encourage more stable housing finance system.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: housing finance, financial stability, panel cointegration, dynamic OLS
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services

References

Agarwal, Sumit, Gene Amromin, Itzhak Ben-David, Souphala Chomsisengphet, and Douglas D. Evanoff, 2011, “The Role of Securitization in Mortgage Renegotiation,” Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics Working Paper 2011–2 (January).

Aizenman, Joshua, and Yothin Jinjarak, 2009, “Current Account Patterns and National Real Estate Markets,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 66, No. 2, pp. 75–89.

Ambrose, Brent W., and Thomas G. Thibodeau, 2004, “Have the GSE Affordable Housing Goals Increased the Supply of Mortgage Credit?” Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 263–73.

Bostic, Raphael W., and Stuart A. Gabriel. 2006, “Do the GSEs Matter to Low-Income Housing Markets? An Assessment of the Effects of the GSE Loan Purchase Goals on California Housing Outcomes,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 458–75.

Central Bank of Ireland, 2010, “Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears” (December, revised). Available via the Internet: www.financialregulator.ie/press-area/pressreleases/

Claessens, Stijn, M. AyhanKose, and Marco E. Terrones, 2008, “What Happens During Recessions, Crunches and Busts?” IMF Working Paper 08/274 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

Committee on the Budget, 2008, “Tax Expenditures; Compendium of Background Material on Individual Provisions” (Washington: Congressional Research Service, December).

Ghent, Andra C., and Marianna Kudlyak, 2010, “Recourse and Residential Mortgage Default: Theory and Evidence from U.S. States,” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Paper No. 09–10R (June, revised).