Park, Kwang Suk and Masih, Mansur (2015): Does the shariah index move together with the conventional equity indexes?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_63925.pdf Download (304kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Generally, Shariah (Islamic) indices are considered to have lower portfolio betas relative to conventional ones. The lower portfolio beta of Islamic indexes is a logical result of Shariah screening. As Shariah screening eliminates stocks with high financial leverage, the resulting portfolio beta ought to be lower because a stock’s beta is reflective of the underlying business risk and financial risk (leverage). With this motivation and background, we have tried to find out whether we can have diversification opportunities with combining Shariah index and conventional indexes. The results of analysis revealed the absence of cointegration between the DJIM index and three conventional indexes such as DAX, HangSeng, KL. This means that diversification opportunities exist for the mentioned indices. But for the S&P and DJIM, we found that they are cointegrated, which implies there exists long run theoretical relationship among the indices. Presence of cointegration indicates the absence of diversification opportunities in the concerned indices. So if we want to get diversification effect, we have to avoid setting up the portfolio with S&P and DJIM with the balanced weight. Because these two variables move together, the investors are not likely to get the positive portfolio effect particularly in the long term.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does the shariah index move together with the conventional equity indexes? |
English Title: | Does the shariah index move together with the conventional equity indexes? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Shariah (Islamic) Index, diversification, cointegration |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C58 - Financial Econometrics E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G15 - International Financial Markets |
Item ID: | 63925 |
Depositing User: | Professor Mansur Masih |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2015 06:19 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 14:13 |
References: | Abul H. (2000). After the credit crunch: the future of Shari’ah compliant sustainable investing. Humanomics, Vol 25, No.4, pp. 285-296. Abul H., Antonios. A and D Krishna P (2005). Impact of Ethical Screening on Investment Performance: The case of the Dow Jones Islamic Index. Islamic Economics Studies, Vol. 12, No.1. Arshad, S. and Rizvi, S.A.R., (2013), “The Impact of Global Financial Shocks to Islamic Indices: Speculative Influence or Fundamental Changes?” Journal of Islamic Finance, Vol. 2, No.1, pp. 13-22 Azhar A.R, Mohd A.Y and Mohd H.M.N (2010). Islamic norms for stocks screening: A comparison between the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange Islamic Index and the Dow Jones Islamic Market Index. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. Vol. 3, No.3, pp. 228 – 240. Engle, R.F. (2002), “Dynamic conditional correlation — a simple class of multivariate GARCH models” Journal of Business Economics & Statistics, Vol.20, pp. 339–350 Hakim, S., & Rashidian, M. (2004, December). How Costly is Investors' Compliance with Sharia. Economic Research Forum. Khaled A.H (2004). Ethical Investment: Empirical evidence from FTSE Islamic Indices. Islamic Economics Studies, Vol. 12, No.1, pp. 21-40. Khaled A.H (2007). Islamic Investment: Evidence from Dow Jones and FTSE Indices. Advances in Islamic Economics and Finance, Vol. 1, pp. 387-398. Mohamed A. and Rubi A. (2011). Return performance and leverage effect in Islamic and socially responsible stock indices: evidence from Dow Jones (DJ) and Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE). African Journal of Business Management, Vol.5, No.16, pp. 6927-6939. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/63925 |