Do positional preferences for wealth and consumption cause inter-temporal distortions?

Wendner, Ronald (2015): Do positional preferences for wealth and consumption cause inter-temporal distortions?

Abstract

This paper derives necessary and sufficient conditions under which positional preferences do not induce inter-temporal distortions. When labor supply is exogenous, positional preferences for consumption have been shown to be non-distortionary for a class of models. However, it has not been explored whether the same holds when households also exhibit positional preferences for wealth. The analysis identifies a restricted homogeneity-property which, when not satisfied, induces positional preferences to be distortionary, despite inelastic labor supply. Without positional preferences for wealth, a constant marginal rate of substitution-property is necessary and sufficient for a consumption positionality to be non-distortionary. Once a household also has positional preferences for wealth in addition, the consumption positionality almost always becomes distortionary, as the implied effects of the positional concerns induce opposing effects on a household's saving behavior. Under a constant marginal rates of substitution-property, these opposing effects exactly offset each other.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Status, keeping up with the Joneses, positional preferences, distortion, endogenous growth, $Ak$ model
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Alonso-Carrera, J., J. Caball, X. Raurich (2006), Welfare Implications of the Interaction between Habits and Consumption Externalities, International Eco- nomic Review 47, 557-571.

Arrow, K.J., P.S. Dasgupta (2009), Conspicuous Consumption, Inconspicuous Leisure, Economic Journal 119, F497-F516.

Brekke, K. A., R. B. Howarth (2002), Status, Growth and the Environment. Goods as Symbols in Applied Welfare Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Clark, A.E., P. Frijters, M.A. Shields (2008), Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and other Puzzles, Journal of Economic Literature 46, 95–114.

Corneo, G., O. Jeanne (1997), On Relative-wealth Effects and the Optimality of Growth, Economics Letters 54, 87-92.

Corneo, G., O. Jeanne (2001), On Relative Wealth Effects and Long-run Growth, Research in Economics 55, 349-358.

Darwin, C. (1871), The Descent of Men and Selection in Relation to Sex, London: John Murray.

Easterlin, R. (1995), Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 47, 35-47.

Fisher, W.H., F.X. Hof (2000), Relative Consumption, Economic Growth, and Taxation, Journal of Economics 72, 241-262.

Fisher, W.H., F.X. Hof (2005), Status Seeking in the Small Open Economy, Journal of Macroeconomics 27, 209-232.

Futagami, K., A. Shibata (1998), Keeping One Step Ahead of the Joneses: Status, the Distribution of Wealth, and Long Run Growth, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 36, 93-111.

Ghosh, S., R. Wendner (2014), Positional Preferences, Endogenous Growth, and Optimal Income- and Consumption Taxation, SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2532312.

Hof, F.X., F. Wirl (2008), Wealth Induced Multiple Equilibria in Small Open Economy Versions of the Ramsey Model, Homo Oeconomicus 25, 107-128.

Johansson-Stenman, O., F. Carlsson, D. Daruvala (2002), Measuring Future Grandparents’ Preferences for Equality and Relative Standing, Economic Jour- nal 112, 362–383.

Johansson-Stenman, O., P. Martinsson (2006), Honestly, Why Are You Driving a BMW?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60, 129-146.

Liu, W.F., S.J. Turnovsky (2005), Consumption Externalities, Production Ex- ternalities, and Long-Run Macroeconomic Efficiency, Journal of Public Eco- nomics 89, 1097-1129.

Nakamoto, Y. (2009), Jealousy and Underconsumption in a One-sector Model with Wealth Preference, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33, 2015- 2029.

Pham, T.K.C. (2005), Economic Growth and Status-seeking through Personal Wealth, European Journal of Political Economy 21, 404-427.

Rauscher, M. (1997), Conspicuous Consumption, Economic Growth, and Taxation, Journal of Economics 66, 35-42.

Rebelo, S. (1991), Long Run Policy Analysis and Long Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy 99, 500-521.

Solnik, S.J., D. Hemenway (1998), Is More Always Better? A Survey on Posi- tional Concerns, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 37, 373-383.

Solnik, S.J., D. Hemenway (2005), Are Positional Concerns Stronger in Some Domains than in Others?, American Economic Review 95, 147-151.

Truyts, T. (2010), Social Status in Economic Theory, Journal of Economic Surveys 24, 137 - 169.

Tournemaine, F., C. Tsoukis (2008), Relative Consumption, Relative Wealth and Growth, Economics Letters 100, 314-316.

Wendner, R. (2014), Ramsey, Pigou, Heterogeneous Agents, and Non- atmospheric Consumption Externalities, Journal of Public Economic Theory 16, 491-521.