Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. and Mbaka, Ruffin M. (2014): Mathématique et Démocratie : une contribution de la Théorie du Choix Social à la pratique de la démocratie en RDC. Published in: Centre de Recherche Interdisciplinaire de l'Université Pédagogique Nationale (CRIDUPN) , Vol. 60, No. 3 (July 2014): pp. 237-249.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_64591.pdf Download (614kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to have in a simple and detailed way the significant results in theory of social choice and to study the resource sharing (goods or responsibilities) between petitioning agents in a proof of election. While analyzing social choice functions more in sight, we present for each of them, with supporting examples, the difficulties and insufficiencies related to the aggregation of the individual preferences of each member of the community. We have then some theoretical results allowing the understanding of the nature and the magnitude of these difficulties. In addition, we study the situation of African societies in general, and that of the Democratic Republic of Congo in particular, and sort out the social choice function which is the most appropriate to them. Meanwhile, we take into account the fair distribution of goods and work for the common benefit of society members, which is the guarantee of welfare of individuals, stability and social peace. These are social values seldom found in Africa. We finally study the properties of the recommended social choice function and possibly present its strength and weaknesses, its advantages and disadvantages when used as a mode of poll.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Mathématique et Démocratie : une contribution de la Théorie du Choix Social à la pratique de la démocratie en RDC |
English Title: | Mathematics and Democracy: a Social Choice Theory contribution to practicing democracy in DRC. |
Language: | French |
Keywords: | Aggregation, Elections, Shares, Social choice theory, Social choice function. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C70 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions |
Item ID: | 64591 |
Depositing User: | Ruffin-Benoît M. Ngoie |
Date Deposited: | 25 May 2015 22:19 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 04:34 |
References: | Arrow, K. J. (1951), Social choice and individual values, Yale University Press. Arrow, K. J. (1963), Social choice and individual values, 2ème ed., Yale University Press. Berlin, I. (1969), Four essays on liberty, Oxford University Press. Trad. Fr. de J. Carnaud et J. Lahana, Eloge de la liberté, Calmann-Lévy, 1988. Bouveret, S. (2007), Allocation et partage équitables des ressources indivisibles : modélisation, complexité et algorithmique, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Toulouse, France. Bouyssou, D. and Vincke, P. (2006), Relations binaires et modélisation des préférences In Concepts et méthodes pour l’aide à la décision, volume 1, Chap. 2, LAVOISIER. Hare, R. M. (1952), The Language of Morals, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Hare, R. M. (1963), Freedom and Reason, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Hare, R. M. (1976), Ethical Theory and Utilitarianism In H. D. Lewis (ed.), 1976, Contemporary British Philosophy: Personal Statements, Series 4, Londres, George Allen & Unwin, trad. de C. Bouchindhomme, Théorie éthique et utilitarisme, In C. Audard (ed.), 1999b, tome 3, p.123-144. Hare, R. M. (1981), Moral Thinking, Oxford, Clarendon Press. Hare, R. M. (1993), Objective Prescriptions, Philosophical Issues, vol. 4, p. 15-32. Hare, R. M. (1997), Sorting out Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Igersheim, H. (2004), Liberté et choix social : Contribution à l’analyse de la liberté en économie normative, Thèse de doctorat, Université Louis Pasteur-Strasbourg I, France. Kelly, J. S. (1988), Social choice theory: An introduction, Springer-Verlag. Rawls, J. (1993), Political liberalism, Columbia University Press. Trad. Fr. de C. Audard, Liberalisme politique, Presses Universitaires de France, 1993. Sen, A. K. (1970a), The impossibility of a Paretian liberal, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 78, 152-157. Sen, A. K. (1970b), Collective choice and social welfare, Londres, Holden-Day, Olivier & Boyd. Sen, A. K. (1986), Social choice theory, HandBook of Mathematical economics, Vol. II, North-Holland. Sen, A. K. (1994), Well-being, capability and public policy, Gionale degli Economisti e annali di Economia, 53 (7-9) : 333 – 347, Septembre. Sen, A. K. (1999), La possibilité du choix social, Conférence Nobel, American Economics Review, n° 89. Sugden, R. (1985), Liberty, preference and choice, Economics and Philosophy 1, 213-229. Vincke, P. (1989), L’Aide multicritère à la décision, Ellipses, Bruxelles. Young, H.-P. (1994), Equity in theory and practice, Princeton University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/64591 |