The Impact of Public and Private Job Training in Colombia

Medina, Carlos and Nuñez, Jairo (2005): The Impact of Public and Private Job Training in Colombia.

Abstract

The authors present various matching estimators of the impact on earnings for individuals who attended public and private job training programs in Colombia. The authors estimate propensity scores by controlling for the wide variety of personal and socioeconomic background variables of those individuals. The effect of training, measured by the mean impact of the treatment on the treated, shows that: (i) for youths, no institution has a significant impact in the short or long run except private institutions for males; the scope of the data, however, limits the reliability of the result; (ii) for adult males, neither SENA nor the other public institutions have a significant impact in the short or long run; (iii) for SENAtrained adult females there are positive but not significant impacts in the short run and greater and close to significant effects in the long run. All other public institutions have a higher impact that is significant in the long-run; (iv) for adults trained at private institutions there are large and significant effects in both the short and long run, but for adult males in the short run the effects are smaller and only barely significant. In addition, neither short nor long courses provided by SENA seem to have a significant impact on earnings. In general, females benefit more from both short and long courses than males. Finally, a cost-benefit analysis shows that under the assumption of direct unitary costs equal to SENA, private institutions are more profitable than public institutions, which are in turn more profitable than SENA.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Program evaluation, selection bias, job training programs
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity

References

Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). 1997a “Encuesta de Calidad de Vida 1997: Diseño e Implementación de la Muestra Probabilística.” Bogotá, Colombia: DANE.

----. 1997b “Encuesta Nacional de Calidad de Vida 1997: Manual de Recolección y Conceptos Básicos.” Bogotá, Colombia: DANE.

Fan, J. 1992. “Design-adaptive Nonparametric Regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association87(420): 998-1004.

Garen, J. 1984. “The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable.” Econometrica 52(5): 1199-1218.

Gómez, H., and E. Libreros 1984. “Formación Profesional y Mercados de Trabajo.” Bogotá, Colombia: SENA, Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social.

Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, J. Smith, and P. Todd. 1998. “Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data.” Econometrica 66(5): 1017-1098.

Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd. 1997. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Program.” Review of Economic Studies 64(4): 605-654.

Heckman, J., R. LaLonde, and J. Smith. 1999. “The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs.” In: O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, editors. Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume III. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.

Heckman, J., L. Lochner, and C. Taber. 1998 “General-Equilibrium Treatment Effects: A Study of Tuition Policy.” American Economic Review 88(2): 381-386.

Jimenez, E. and B. Kugler. 1987. “The Earnings Impact of Training Duration in a Developing Country: An Ordered Probit Selection Model of Colombia’s Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (SENA).” The Journal of Human Resources 22(2): 228-247.

Jimenez, E., B. Kugler, and R. Horn. 1989. “National In-Service Training Systems in Latin America: An Economic Evaluation of Colombia’s SENA.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 37(3): 595-610.

Lee, L. F. 1983. “Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity.” Econometrica 51(2): 507-512. 36

López, H. 1994a. “Mercado Laboral Urbano y Desempleo Friccional y Estructural en Colombia: El Papel del SENA.” Planeación y Desarrollo, Edición Especial, Mayo 1994: 257-290.

----. “Contexto Macroeconómico Colombiano, Mercado Laboral y Retos para una Política de Empleo.” Bogotá: Fundación Friedrich Ebert de Colombia (FESCOL).

Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Puryear, J. 1977. “Estudio Comparativo de la Formación Profesional en Colombia: El Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje.” Montevideo, Uruguay: Oficina Internacional de Trabajo(Cinterfor).

Psacharopoulos, G., and W. Loxley. 1985. Diversified Secondary Education and Development: Evidence from Colombia and Tanzania. Baltimore, United States: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Ramírez, M. and A. Reyes. 1989. “Estudio Sectorial de la Educación Técnica y la Formación Profesional en Colombia.” Bogotá, Colombia: Ministerio de Educación Nacional.

Rosenbaum, P. and D. B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70(1): 41-55.

Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje. 1999. Evaluación de Impacto de Cursos Largos Consolidado Nacional. Santafé de Bogotá, Colombia: SENA.

Silverman, B.W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall.

Velez, C. 1994. “La Capacitación para el Trabajo en Colombia.” Planeación y Desarrollo. May 1994 (Special Edition): 291-296.

Vella, F. 1993. “A Simple Estimator for Models with Censored Endogenous Regressors.”International Economic Review 34(2): 441-457.

----. 1998. “Estimating Models with Sample Selection Bias: A Survey.” Journal of Human Resources 33(1): 127-169.