Pittman, Russell (2016): The Strange Career of Independent Voting Trusts in U.S. Rail Mergers.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_72640.pdf Download (249kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Voting trust arrangements have a long history at both the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Surface Transportation Board as devices to protect the incentives of acquiring firms and maintain the independence of acquiring and target firms during the pendency of regulatory investigation of the merger proposal. However, they are not without problems. The STB argued in 2001 that as Class I railroads have become fewer and larger, it may be difficult to find alternative purchasers for the target firm if the STB turns down the proposal. The Antitrust Division argued in 2016 that joint stock ownership creates anticompetitive and/or otherwise undesirable incentives, even if the independence of the voting trustee is complete. On the other hand, the functions served by voting trusts in railroad mergers are served by merger termination fees and other contractual “lockup” mechanisms in other parts of the economy, without the same incentive problems as voting trusts. Thus voting trusts may no longer serve a useful function in railroad merger deliberations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Strange Career of Independent Voting Trusts in U.S. Rail Mergers |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | railroads, mergers, voting trusts, merger termination fees, merger lockup provisions |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G34 - Mergers ; Acquisitions ; Restructuring ; Corporate Governance K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L92 - Railroads and Other Surface Transportation N - Economic History > N7 - Transport, Trade, Energy, Technology, and Other Services > N71 - U.S. ; Canada: Pre-1913 N - Economic History > N7 - Transport, Trade, Energy, Technology, and Other Services > N72 - U.S. ; Canada: 1913- |
Item ID: | 72640 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Russell Pittman |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2016 15:42 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 02:08 |
References: | Afsharipour, Afra, Transforming the Allocation of Deal Risk Through Reverse Termination Fees, 63 VANDERBILT L. REV. 1161 (2010) Ansnes, Bliss, Federal Regulation of Railroad Holding Companies, 32 COLUMBIA L. REV. 999 (1932) Antón, Miguel, Florian Ederer, Mireia Giné, and Martin Schmalz, Common Ownership, Competition, and Top Management Incentives, working paper, July 1, 2016 Baldwin, Simeon E., Voting-Trusts, 1 YALE L.J. 1 (1891) Barnaco, Thomas A., Brandeis, Choate and the Boston & Maine Merger Battle, 1908-1914, 3 MASS. LEGAL HIST. 125 (1997) Bates, Thomas W., and Michael L. Lemmon, Breaking up is hard to do? An analysis of termination fee provisions and merger outcomes, 69 J. OF FINANCIAL ECON. 469 (2003) Berle, Adolf A., Jr., and Gardiner C. Means, THE MODERN CORPORATION AND PRIVATE PROPERTY (1932) Bessler, Wolfgang, Colin Schneck, and Jan Zimmermann, Bidder contests in international mergers and acquisitions: The impact of toeholds, preemptive bidding, and termination fees, 42 INT’L. REV. OF FINANCIAL ANAL. 4 (2015) Bogen, Jules Irwin, THE ANTHRACITE RAILROADS: A STUDY IN AMERICAN RAILROAD ENTERPRISE (1927) Burke, Brian, and John Fedele, Think Again – Allocating Antitrust Risk in a Climate of Protracted Investigations, CPI ANTITRUST CHRON., May 2016 Burr, Charles H., Jr., The Validity of Voting Trust Provisions in Recent Railroad Reorganizations, 35 AMER. L. REG. AND REV. 413 (n.s., 1896) Campbell, E.G., THE REORGANIZATION OF THE AMERICAN RAILROAD SYSTEM, 1893-1900 (1938) Campos, J., Lessons from railway reforms in Brazil and Mexico, 8 TRANSPORT POL. 85 (2001) Coates, John C., IV, and Guhan Subramanian, A Buy-Side Model of M&A Lockups: Theory and Evidence, 53 STANFORD L. REV. 307 (2000) Crum, Michael R., and Benjamin Allen, U.S. Transportation Merger Policy: Evolution, Current Status, and Antitrust Considerations, 13 INT’L J. OF TRANSPORT ECON. 41 (1986) Cushing, Harry A., VOTING TRUSTS: A CHAPTER IN RECENT CORPORATE HISTORY (1916) Daggett, Stuart, RAILROAD REORGANIZATION (Harvard Economic Studies, v. iv) (1908, repr. 1967) Dewing, Arthur S., The Purposes Achieved by Railroad Reorganization, 9 AMER. ECON. REV. 277 (1919) Dougall, Herbert E., Review of Campbell (1938), 46 J. POLITICAL ECON. 420 (1938) Eckert, James B., Review of Leavitt, THE VOTING TRUST, 32 AMER. ECON. REV. 387 (1942) Elhauge, Einer, Horizontal Shareholding, 129 HARVARD L. REV. 1267 (2016) Epstein, Steven, Mergers and Heightened Regulatory Risk, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, May 5, 2016 Farrell, Joseph, and Carl Shapiro, Asset ownership and market structure in oligopoly, 21 RAND J. OF ECON. 275 (1990) Giles, John Warren, Is the Voting Trust Agreement a “Dangerous Instrumentality”?, 3 CATHOLIC U. L. REV. 81 (1953) Gras, N.S.B., and Henrietta M. Larson, J. Pierpont Morgan, in CASEBOOK IN AMERICAN BUSINESS HISTORY (1939), excerpted in Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., THE RAILROADS: THE NATION’S FIRST BIG BUSINESS (1965) Haney, Lewis H., THE BUSINESS OF RAILWAY TRANSPORTATION (1924) Helmetag, Carl, Jr., Railroad Mergers: The Accommodation of the Interstate Commerce Act and Antitrust Policies, 54 VIRGINIA L. REV. 1493 (1968) International Transport Forum, PEER REVIEW OF RAILWAY FREIGHT DEVELOPMENT IN MEXICO (February 2014) Johnson, James C., and Terry C. Whiteside, Professor Ripley Revisited: A Current Analysis of Railroad Mergers, 42 ICC PRACTITIONER’S J. 419 (1975) Kwoka, John E., Jr., and Lawrence J. White, Manifest Destiny? The Union Pacific and Southern Pacific Railroad Merger, in Kwoka and White, eds., THE ANTITRUST REVOLUTION: ECONOMICS, COMPETITION, AND POLICY (4th ed., 2004) Lanier, J.F.D., Winslow, Lanier and Company, SKETCH LIFE OF J.F.D. LANIER (1870), excerpted in Alfred D. Chandler, Jr., THE RAILROADS: THE NATION’S FIRST BIG BUSINESS (1965) Leavitt, John Anton, THE VOTING TRUST: A DEVICE FOR CORPORATE CONTROL (1941) Leonard, William Norris, RAILROAD CONSOLIDATION UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920 (1946, repr. 1968) McAfee, R. Preston, and John McMillan, Auctions and Bidding, 25 J. ECON. LIT. 699 (1987) MacDonald, James, M., Competition and Rail Rates for the Shipment of Corn, Soybeans, and Wheat, 18 RAND J. ECON. 151 (1987) _____, Railroad Deregulation, Innovation, and Competition: Effects of the Staggers Act on Grain Transportation, 37 J. LAW & ECON.63 (1989) Meade, Edward Sherwood, The Reorganization of Railroads, 17 ANNALS AMER. ACAD. POL. AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 25 (1901) Nain, Amrita, and Yan Wang, The Product Market Impact of Minority Stake Acquisitions, 62 MANAGEMENT SCI. (2016), forthcoming Nowicki, Elizabeth, Reverse Termination Fee Provisions in Acquisition Agreements, paper presented at the 3rd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies, Cornell University (2008) Officer, Micah S., Termination fees in mergers and acquisition, 69 J. OF FINANCIAL ECON. 431 (2003) PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY: CORPORATE HISTORY OF THE PITTSBURGH, FORT WAYNE AND CHICAGO RAILWAY COMPANY (1875) Pittman, Russell, Railroads and Competition: The Santa Fe/Southern Pacific Merger Proposal, 39 J. INDUSTRIAL ECON. 25 (1990) _____, Specific Investments, Contracts, and Opportunism: The Evolution of Railroad Sidetrack Agreements, 34 J. LAW & ECON. 565 (1991) _____, The Economics of Railroad “Captive Shipper” Legislation, 62 ADMIN. LAW REV. 919, 934 (2010) _____, Railways Restructuring and Ukrainian Economic Reform, 2 MAN & THE ECONOMY 87 (2015) Quinn, Brian J.M., Optionality in Merger Agreements, 35 DELAWARE J. OF CORP. L. 789 (2010) Reynolds, Robert J., and Bruce R. Snapp, The Competitive Effects of Partial Equity Interests and Joint Ventures, 4 INT’L J. OF INDUSTRIAL ORG. 141 (1986) Rich, Edgar J., The Transportation Act of 1920, 10 AMER. ECON. REV. 507 (1920) Ripley, William Z., RAILROADS: FINANCE & ORGANIZATION (1915) Roop, Stephen, Jeffery Warner, Felipe Zambrano, Roubabah Ismailova, and Dong-Hun Kang, THE IMPACT OF MEXICAN RAIL PRIVATIZATION ON THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (Texas Transportation Institute, February 2001), http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu.edu/documents/2128-2.pdf Ruback, Richard S., Assessing Competition in the Market for Corporate Acquisitions, 11 J. FIN. ECON. 141 (1983) Tarbert, Heath Price, Merger Breakup Fees: A Critical Challenge to Anglo-American Corporate Law, 34 LAW & POLICY IN INTL. BUSINESS 627 (2003) Thaler, Richard H., Anomalies: The Winner’s Curse, 2 J. ECON. PERSPECTIVES 191 (1988) Tucker, Darren S., and Kevin L. Yingling, Keeping the Engagement Ring: Apportioning Antitrust Risk with Reverse Breakup Fees, 22 ANTITRUST 70 (2008) Weller, John L., THE NEW HAVEN RAILROAD: ITS RISE AND FALL (1969) |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/72640 |