A „negyedik generációs” egyetemek szerepe a tudáshasznosításban

Lukovics, Miklós and Zuti, Bence (2015): A „negyedik generációs” egyetemek szerepe a tudáshasznosításban. Published in: Conference Proceedings. Tudásteremtés és -alkalmazás a modern társadalomban (2015): pp. 188-197.

Abstract

Nowadays in case of the operation of universities there is a clear advancement towards a common pattern. Besides the enhancement of local economy the local social commitment is a definitive part of the mid- and long-term strategies of higher education institutions. Many successful examples prove that these institutions are able to foster the level of economic development in certain regions. The realization of this can happen with the collective presence of three activities. Excellent education, effective research and embedment in the local economy are all necessary activities. The main requirement of efficient knowledge management is that the institutions should possess outstanding IT- infrastructures, databases, create professional forums that can enhance the flow of knowledge. Thus knowledge management can be considered as a tool for increasing the flow of information. The study has two goals: It attempts to identify the characteristics of „fourth generation” universities and examines the role of modern universities in activities that can enhance knowledge-transfer.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Role of „Fourth Generation” Universities in Knowledge Management
• Language: Hungarian
• Keywords: „Fourth generation” universities, local economic development, knowledge management, third mission
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

References

Arbo, P. – Benneworth, P. (2007): Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review. Education Working Paper 9. OECD, Paris.

Benneworth, P. – Dawley, S. (2005): Managing the University Third Strand Innovation Process? Developing Innovation Support Services in Regionally Engaged Universities. Knowledge, Technology, & Policy, 3, 74–94. o.

Benneworth, P. – Sanderson, A. (2009): The Regional Engagement of Universities: Building Capacity in a Sparse Innovation Environment. Higher Education Management and Policy, 1, 131–148. o.

Carayannis, E. G. – Campbell, D. F. J. (2012): Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems. Twenty-first-Century Democracy, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship for Development. SpringerBriefs in Business, 7, 1–63. o. Carayannis, E. G. – Campbell, D. F. J. (2014): Developed democracies versus emerging autocracies: arts, democracy, and innovation in Quadruple Helix innovation systems. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 23. o.

Chatterton, P. – Goddard, J. (2000): The Response of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Needs. European Journal of Education, 4, 475–496. o.

Clark, B. R. (1998): Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon, Oxford.

Clark, B. R. (2001): The Entrepreneurial University: New Foundations for Collegiality, Autonomy, and Achievement. Higher Education and Management, 2, 9–24. o.

Etzkowitz, H. (2002): The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Implications for Policy and Evaluation. Science Policy Institute, Stockholm.

Etzkowitz, H. (2008): The Triple Helix: Industry, University, and Government in Innovation. Routledge. New York.

Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (2000): The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123. o.

Florida, R. (1995): Toward the Learning Region. Futures, 5, 527–536. o.

Gibb, A. A. – Haskins, G. – Robertson, I. (2013): Leading the Entrepreneurial University: Meeting the Entrepreneurial Development Needs of Higher Education Institutions In Altmann, A. – Ebersberger, B. (szerk.): Universities in Change, Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, 9–45. o.

Holbrook, J. A. – Wolfe, D. A. (2002): Knowledge, Clusters and Regional Innovation: Economic Development in Canada. In Holbrook, J. A. – Wolfe, D. A. (eds): Knowledge, Clusters and Learning Regions. School of Policy Studies, Queen's University. Kingston.

Hoq, K. M. G. – Akter, R. (2012): Kowledge Management in Universities: Role of Knowledge Workers. Bangladesh Journal of Library and Information Science, 2, 92–102. o.

Imreh-Tóth M. – Lukovics M. (2014): Egyetemközpontú vállalkozásfejlesztés elmaradott térségben: negyedik generációs egyetemi funkciók? Marketing & Menedzsment, 2, 43–56. o.

Kitagawa, F. (2005): Entrepreneurial Universities and the Development of Regional Societies: A Spatial View of the Europe of Knowledge. Higher Education Management and Policy, 3, 65–89. o.

Lang, J. C. (2001): Managerial Concerns in Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 43–59. o.

Lengyel B. (2004): Egyetem – gazdaság – kormányzat együttműködése: a Triple Helix modell a gyakorlatban. In Lengyel I. (szerk.): A Szegedi Tudományegyetem lehetőségei a tudásalapú helyi gazdaságfejlesztésben. Kutatási háttéranyagok V. kötet. K+F és egyetemek az Európai Unióban, 1–31. o.

Lengyel I. (2000): Porter-rombusz: a regionális gazdaságfejlesztési stratégiák alapmodellje. Tér és Társadalom, 4, 39–86. o.

Lukovics, M. – Zuti, B. (2013): Successful universities towards the improvement of regional competitiveness: „Fourth Generation” universities. Paper presented at the “European Regional Science Association (ERSA) 53th Congress „Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World economy” 53th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, Palermo, Italy.

Lukovics M. – Zuti B. (2014). Egyetemek a régiók versenyképességének javításáért: „negyedik generációs” egyetemek? Tér és Társadalom, 4, 77–96. o.

McDermott, R. (1999): Why Information Technology Inspired But Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 41, 103–117. o.

Melbourne (2010): Growing Esteem 2010. University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Oprea, M. (2011): A University Knowledge Management Tool for Academic Research Activity Evaluation. Informatica Economica, 15, 58–71. o.

Oregon (2009): Strategic Plan 2009-2013. Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon, USA.

Pawlowski, K. (2009): The ‘Fourth Generation University’ as a Creator of the Local and Regional Development. Higher Education in Europe, 1, 51–64. o.

QS (2012): Methodology: A simple overview of the QS World University Rankings. London, UK. Southampton (2010): Changing the World. The University Strategy. University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

THE (2012): THE Global Rankings: Change for the better. Times Higher Education World University Rankings. London, UK.

Wissema, J. G. (2009): Towards the third generation university. Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Egyesült Királyság.