Slednev, Viktor and Bertsch, Valentin and Ruppert, Manuel and Fichtner, Wolf (2017): Highly resolved optimal renewable allocation planning in power systems under consideration of dynamic grid topology.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79706.pdf Download (776kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The system integration of an increasing amount of electricity generation from decentralised renewable energy sources (RES-E) is a major challenge for the transition of the European power system. The feed-in profiles and the potential of RES-E vary along the geographical and temporal dimension and are also subject to technological choices and changes. To support power system planning in the context of RES-E expansion and allocation planning required for meeting RES-E targets, analyses are needed assessing where and which RES-E capacities are likely to be expanded. This requires models that are able to consider the power grid capacity and topology including their changes over time. We therefore developed a model that meets these requirements and considers the assignment of RES-E potentials to grid nodes as variable. This is a major advancement in comparison to existing approaches based on a fixed and pre-defined assignment of RES-E potentials to a node. While our model is generic and includes data for all of Europe, we demonstrate the model in the context of a case study in the Republic of Ireland. We find wind onshore to be the dominating RES-E technology from a cost-efficient perspective. Since spatial wind onshore potentials are highest in the West and North of the country, this leads to a high capacity concentration in these areas. Should policy makers wish to diversify the RES-E portfolio, we find that a diversification mainly based on bioenergy and wind offshore is achievable at a moderate cost increase. Including solar photovoltaics into the portfolio, particularly rooftop installations, however, leads to a significant cost increase but also to a more scattered capacity installation over the country.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Highly resolved optimal renewable allocation planning in power systems under consideration of dynamic grid topology |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | optimal renewable allocation planning, dynamic grid topology, large-scale optimisation |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 79706 |
Depositing User: | Valentin Bertsch |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jun 2017 13:27 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 08:32 |
References: | [1] Cohen JJ, Reichl J, Schmidthaler M. Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review. Energy 2014; 76:4-9. [2] Bertsch V, Hall M, Weinhardt C, Fichtner W. Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany. Energy 2016; 114:465-477. [3] COM(2011) 885. Energy roadmap 2050, COM(2011) 885 final of 15 December 2011, European Union; 2011. [4] Slednev V, Bertsch V, Fichtner W. A multi-objective time segmentation approach for power generation and transmission models. In: Doerner K, Ljubic I, Pflug G, Tragler G, editors. Operations Research Proceedings 2015, Springer; 2017. [5] Slednev V, Ruppert M, Bertsch V, Fichtner W, Meyer-Huebner N, Suriyah M, Leibfried T, Gerstner P, Schick M, Heuveline V. Regionalizing Input Data for Generation and Transmission Expansion Planning Models. In: Bertsch V, Fichtner W, Heuveline V, Leibfried T, editors. Advances in Energy System Optimization, Springer; 2017. [6] Tan W-S, Tan W-S, Majid MS, Rahman HA. Optimal distributed renewable generation planning: A review of different approaches. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2013; 18:626-645. [7] Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND. Optimal distributed generation placement in power distribution networks: models, methods, and future research. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2013; 28(3):3420-3428. [8] Resch B, Sagl G, Törnros T, Bachmaier A, Eggers J-B, Herkel S, Narmsara S, Gündra H. GIS-based planning and modeling for renewable energy: Challenges and future research avenues. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2014; 3(2):662-692. [9] Mainzer K, Fath K, McKenna R, McKenna R, Fichtner W, Fichtner W. A high-resolution determination of the technical potential for residential-roof-mounted photovoltaic systems in Germany. Solar Energy 2014; 105:715-731. [10] Grassi S, Chokani N, Abhari RS. Large scale technical and economical assessment of wind energy potential with a GIS tool: Case study Iowa. Energy Policy 2012; 45:73-85. [11] Zografidou E, Petridis K, Arabatzis G, Dey PK. Optimal design of the renewable energy map of Greece using weighted goal-programming and data envelopment analysis. Computers & Operations Research 2016; 66:313-326. [12] Knopf B, Nahmmacher P, Schmid E. The European renewable energy target for 2030--An impact assessment of the electricity sector. Energy Policy 2015; 85:50-60. [13] Suri M, Huld TA, Dunlop ED, Ossenbrink HA. Potential of solar electricity generation in the European Union member states and candidate countries. Solar Energy 2007; 81(10):1295-1305. [14] Thomaidis NS, Santos-Alamillos FJ, Pozo-Vázquez D, Usaola-García J. Optimal management of wind and solar energy resources. Computers & Operations Research 2016; 66:284-291. [15] Ghosh S, Ghoshal SP, Ghosh S. Optimal sizing and placement of distributed generation in a network system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 2010; 32(8):849-856. [16] Nick M, Riahy G, Hosseinian S, Fallahi F. Wind power optimal capacity allocation to remote areas taking into account transmission connection requirements. IET Renewable Power Generation 2011; 5(5):347-355. [17] COM. Launching the public consultation process on a new energy market design, European Commission: COM(2015) 340 final; 2015. [18] CEER. Key support elements of RES in Europe: moving towards market integration, Report C15-SDE-49-03 of the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER); 2016. [19] Held A, Ragwitz M, Gephart M, de Visser E, Klessmann C. Design features of support schemes for renewable electricity, Report compiled within the European project "Cooperation between EU MS under the Renewable Energy Directive and interaction with support schemes" (Project number: DESNL13116); 2014. [20] McKenna R, Hollnaicher S, vd Leye PO, Fichtner W. Cost-potentials for large onshore wind turbines in Europe. Energy 2015; 83:217-229. [21] Ruppert M, Slednev V, Bertsch V, Fichtner W. The impact of microeconomic decisions in electricity market modelling on load flows in transmission grids. IEEE; 2016, p. 1-5. [22] Di Cosmo V, Lynch M. Competition and the single electricity market: Which lessons for Ireland? Utilities Policy 2016. [23] Standen J, Wilson C, Vosper S. Remodelling the Irish national onshore and offshore wind atlas, Met Office; 2013. [24] Swinand GP, O'Mahoney A. Estimating the impact of wind generation and wind forecast errors on energy prices and costs in Ireland. Renewable Energy 2015; 75:468-473. [25] Gallagher S, Tiron R, Whelan E, Gleeson E, Dias F, McGrath R. The nearshore wind and wave energy potential of Ireland: a high resolution assessment of availability and accessibility. Renewable Energy 2016; 88:494-516. [26] SEAI. Energy in Ireland 1990 – 2015, Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland (SEAI), 2016 Report; 2016. [27] DCENR. Ireland's transition to a low carbon energy future: 2015-2030, White paper by the Department for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Ireland; 2015. [28] EC. EU Reference Scenario 2016: Energy, transport and GHG emissions - Trends to 2050, European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, Directorate-General for Climate Action and Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport; 2016. [29] EirGrid. All-Island Generation Capacity Statement 2016-2025, EirGrid Group, Dublin, Ireland; 2016. [30] Taylor M, Ralon P, Ilas A. The power to change: solar and wind cost reduction potential to 2025, International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA); 2016. [31] IRENA. Biomass for Power Generation, IRENA Working Paper, 1(1/5), International Renewable Energy Agency, Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series; 2012. [32] EirGrid. All-Island Ten Year Transmission Forecast Statement 2015, EirGrid Group, Dublin, Ireland; 2015. [33] Curtis J, Lynch M, Zubiate L. Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from electricity: The influence of the North Atlantic Oscillation. Applied Energy 2016; 161:487-496. [34] Bertsch V, Hyland M, Mahony M. What Drives People's Opinions of Electricity Infrastructure? Empirical Evidence from Ireland. Energy Policy 2017; 106:472-497. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79706 |