Xekalaki, Evdokia and Degiannakis, Stavros (2005): Evaluating Volatility Forecasts in Option Pricing in the Context of a Simulated Options Market. Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis , Vol. 2, No. 49 (2005): pp. 611-629.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80468.pdf Download (510kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The performance of an ARCH model selection algorithm based on the standardized prediction error criterion (SPEC) is evaluated. The evaluation of the algorithm is performed by comparing different volatility forecasts in option pricing through the simulation of an options market. Traders employing the SPEC model selection algorithm use the model with the lowest sum of squared standardized one-step-ahead prediction errors for obtaining their volatility forecast. The cumulative profits of the participants in pricing one-day index straddle options always using variance forecasts obtained by GARCH, EGARCH and TARCH models are compared to those made by the participants using variance forecasts obtained by models suggested by the SPEC algorithm. The straddles are priced on the Standard and Poor 500 (S & P 500) index. It is concluded that traders, who base their selection of an ARCH model on the SPEC algorithm, achieve higher profits than those, who use only a single ARCH model. Moreover, the SPEC algorithm is compared with other criteria of model selection that measure the ability of the ARCH models to forecast the realized intra-day volatility. In this case too, the SPEC algorithm users achieve the highest returns. Thus, the SPEC model selection method appears to be a useful tool in selecting the appropriate model for estimating future volatility in pricing derivatives.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Evaluating Volatility Forecasts in Option Pricing in the Context of a Simulated Options Market |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ARCH models, Forecast Volatility, Model selection, Predictability, Standardized Prediction Error Criterion, Option Pricing |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C32 - Time-Series Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes ; State Space Models C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G17 - Financial Forecasting and Simulation |
Item ID: | 80468 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Stavros Degiannakis |
Date Deposited: | 01 Aug 2017 05:40 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 10:47 |
References: | Akaike, H., 1973. Information Theory and the Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. Proceeding of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest, 267-281. Andersen, T.G. and Bollerslev, T., 1998. Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts. International Economic Review, 39, 885-905. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. and Lange, S. 1999. Forecasting Financial Market Volatility: Sample Frequency vis-à-vis Forecast Horizon. Journal of Empirical Finance, 6, 457-477. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Ebens H., 2001. The Distribution of Stock Return Volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 43-76. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T., Diebold, F.X. and Labys, P., 2003. Modeling and Forecasting Realized Volatility. Econometrica, 71, 529-626. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. and Diebold, F.X., 2004. Parametric and Nonparametric Volatility Measurement. Handbook of Financial Econometrics, (eds.) Yacine Aït-Sahalia and Lars Peter Hansen, Amsterdam, North Holland, forthcoming. Bera, A.K. and Higgins, M.L., 1993. ARCH Models: Properties, Estimation and Testing. Journal of Economic Surveys, 7, 305-366. Black, F., 1976. Studies of Stock Market Volatility Changes. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Section, 177-181. Black, F. and Scholes, M., 1973. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654. Bollerslev, T., 1986. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327. Bollerslev, T., 1987. A Conditional Heteroskedastic Time Series Model for Speculative Prices and Rates of Return. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 542-547. Bollerslev, T. and Ghysels, E., 1996. Periodic Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 14, 139-157. Bollerslev, T. and Wooldridge, J., 1992. Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time Varying Covariances. Econometric Reviews, 11, 143-172. Bollerslev, T., Chou, R.C. and Kroner, K., 1992. ARCH Modelling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 52, 5-59. Bollerslev, T., Engle, R.F. and Nelson, D., 1994. ARCH Models. In R.F. Engle and D.L. McFadden (Ed.), Handbook of Econometrics, Ch.49, IV Elsevier. Box, G.E.P. and Tiao, G.C., 1973. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Reading, Mass. Cai, J., 1994. A Markov Model of Switching-Regime ARCH. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 309-316. Campbell, J., Lo, A. and MacKinlay, A.C., 1997. The Econometrics of Financial Markets. New Jersey, Princeton University Press. Degiannakis, S. and Xekalaki, E., 1999. Predictability and Model Selection in the Context of ARCH Models. Technical Report no 69, Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business. Degiannakis, S. and Xekalaki, E., 2001a. Using a Prediction Error Criterion for Model Selection in Forecasting Option Prices. Technical Report no 131, Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business. Degiannakis, S. and Xekalaki, E., 2001b. Assessing the Performance of a Prediction Error Criterion Model Selection Algorithm. Technical Report no 133, Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business. Degiannakis, S. and Xekalaki, E., 2002. Using the Prediction Error Criterion as a Selection Method in Forecasting Option Prices: A Simulation Approach. Technical Report no 191, Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business Degiannakis, S. and Xekalaki, E., 2004. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Models: A Review. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management, 1(2). (In press) Ding, Z., Granger, C.W.J. and Engle, R.F., 1993. A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, 83-106. Engle, R.F., 1982. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of the United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica, 50(4), 987-1007. Engle, R.F. and Ng, V.K., 1993. Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility. Journal of Finance, 48, 1749-1778. Engle, R.F., Hong, C.H., Kane, A. and Noh, J., 1993. Arbitrage Valuation of Variance Forecasts with Simulated Options. Advances in Futures and Options Research, 6, 393-415. Engle, R.F., Kane, A. and Noh, J., 1997. Index-Option Pricing with Stochastic Volatility and the Value of the Accurate Variance Forecasts. Review of Derivatives Research, 1, 120-144. Giot, P. and Laurent, S., 2003. Value-at-Risk for Long and Short Trading Positions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 641-664. Glosten, L.R., Jagannathan, R. and Runkle, D.E., 1993. On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. Journal of Finance, 48, 1779-1801. Gourieroux, C., 1997. ARCH models and Financial Applications. Springer Series. Hamilton, J.D. and Susmel, R., (1994). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity and Changes in Regime. Journal of Econometrics, 64, 307-333. Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A., 2001. A Forecast Comparison of Volatility Models: Does Anything Beat a GARCH(1,1)? Brown University, Department of Economics, Working Paper. Harvey, A.C., 1981. The Econometric Analysis of Time Series. Oxford. Hsieh, D.A., 1989. Modeling Heteroscedasticity in Daily Foreign-Exchange Rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 7, 307-317. Jorion, P., 1988. On Jump Processes in the Foreign Exchange and Stock Markets. Review of Financial Studies, 1, 427-445. Kane, A. and Marks, S.G., 1987. The Rocking Horse Analyst. Journal of Portfolio Management, 13, 32-37. Kayahan B., Saltoglu, T. and Stengos, T., 2002. Intra-Day Features of Realized Volatility: Evidence from an Emerging Market. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(1), 17-24. Lambert, P. and Laurent, S., 2000. Modeling Skewness Dynamics in Series of Financial Data. Discussion Paper. (Institut de Statistique, Louvain-la-Neuve). Lambert, P. and Laurent, S., 2001. Modeling Financial Time Series Using GARCH-Type Models and a Skewed Student Density. Mimeo. (Universite de Liege). Lo, A. and MacKinlay, C., 1988. Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test. Review of financial studies, 1, 41-66. Mandelbrot, B., 1963. The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, 36, 394-419. Marquardt, D.W., 1963. An Algorithm for Least Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11, 431-441. Nelson, D.B., 1991. Conditional Heteroscedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach. Econometrica, 59, 347-370. Pagan, A.R. and Schwert, G.W., 1990. Alternative Models for Conditional Stock Volatility. Journal of Econometrics, 45, 267-290. Poon, S.H. and Granger, C.W.J., 2003. Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review, Journal of Economic Literature, XLI, 478-539. Scholes, M. and Williams, J., 1977. Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 309-327. Schwarz, G., 1978. Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. Sentana, E., 1995. Quadratic ARCH models. Review of Economic Studies, 62, 639-661. Vilasuso, J., 2002. Forecasting Exchange Rate Volatility. Economics Letters, 76, 59-64. Xekalaki, E. and Degiannakis, S, 2004. A Comparison of the Standardized Prediction Error Criterion with Other ARCH Model Selection Criteria. Technical Report no 205, Department of Statistics, Athens University of Economics and Business. Xekalaki E., Panaretos, J. and Psarakis, S., 2003. A Predictive Model Evaluation and Selection Approach - The Correlated Gamma Ratio Distribution. In: J. Panaretos (Ed.), Stochastic Musings: Perspectives from the Pioneers of the Late 20th Century, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 188-202. Zakoian, J.M., 1990. Threshold Heteroskedasticity Models. Manuscript, CREST, INSEE |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80468 |